-->
@XLAV
ethang is from the religious forum and was regularly triggered by the atheists who would reply to his posts "trolling" him. He complained to Airmax expecting him to ban them and ofc Airmax didn't. Cue present circumstance.
ethang is from the religious forum and was regularly triggered by the atheists who would reply to his posts "trolling" him. He complained to Airmax expecting him to ban them and ofc Airmax didn't. Cue present circumstance.
Trust me
This site has an owner who seems ready to be the head mod. We do not need Airmax.Airmax was as biased as they came. It wasn't the spam that killed DDO, it was the trolls. Airmax was alerted to their horrendous abuse and he decided to do absolutely nothing about it.
Not only that, but was generally snippy with people who were concerned about it.
For years he stood by as the site died from neglect and trolls, and spent his time with his crew making movies about how terrible the religion board was.
Most of your post is just your opinion, which is fine, but I have the tangible record of DDO to support my point.
Take my challenge. DDO is still open. Go there and tell me if you think hari or bully were not ban-able behavior. If you would allow such behavior here, then we are lucky you aren't mod.
Airmax would not have banned rational madman. Even at 10 times as offensive.
We don't need to agree on Airmax. You like him, fine. I don't think he was a good mod. I do not need to justify that to you. And I would not divulge private conversations jus because you ask for them.
I'm glad Mike isn't him. I like this site. If you think Max is so great, go there. The site is still functioning.
Just curious, how are you going to select mods? Will you host an election of sorts for the community to vote, or choose someone you know and trust?
This site has an owner who seems ready to be the head mod. We do not need Airmax.Airmax was as biased as they came. It wasn't the spam that killed DDO, it was the trolls. Airmax was alerted to their horrendous abuse and he decided to do absolutely nothing about it.Not only that, but was generally snippy with people who were concerned about it. For years he stood by as the site died from neglect and trolls, and spent his time with his crew making movies about how terrible the religion board was.If Mike wasn't the same future as DDO, he can bring Max here. As soon as he is here as mod, trolls like dee, willows, bully, and hari, will know they will not be limited at all and they will infect the site.Already bully is here paving the place with his stupidity. You can have that. This site has done fine without Airmax. Let him stay at the site he made. We're fine.
Most of your post is just your opinion, which is fine, but I have the tangible record of DDO to support my point.Of course it's just my opinion, responding to your opinion. That's what debate is. xD
Take my challenge. DDO is still open. Go there and tell me if you think hari or bully were not ban-able behavior. If you would allow such behavior here, then we are lucky you aren't mod here
Max isn't an active mod anymore,
he has no real obligation to the website, especially after the influx of spam.
Max was a volunteer mod and was never paid for his job,
though he's put more collective work into the site than the developers by a long shot.
Point is, he is no longer invested as much in what happens anymore because the site is broken and the developers refuse to fix it.
Whatever's happened over the last couple months on the site behavior wise, max has taken much less notice or care of.
I personally don't know either of those members or the behavior you are referring to, because you haven't posted any links, but it's a lot less likely for something to be done about their behavior now then it was before the influx of spam increased to the point of making the site virtually unuseable.
If their behaviors are as toxic as you say, and this was brought up to him when the site was working more functionally, there is a good chance he would have looked into the situation and done something about it.
I have known Max presumably a lot longer than you have, and I think other members who know well him would vouch that he would always look objectively into any situation back when the site was working.
You are mis-directing a lot of your frustrations to Max when it should be at the failings of the developers of DDO.
Airmax would not have banned rational madman. Even at 10 times as offensive.
This is blatantly untrue. Rationalmadman, if memory serves, was perma-banned back in 2013. He was banned and un-banned multiple times before that as well
Max is no longer invested in the site now, so yeah trolls run rampant, but he did an amazing thankless job for years sheerly out of his own personal interest.
We don't need to agree on Airmax. You like him, fine. I don't think he was a good mod. I do not need to justify that to you. And I would not divulge private conversations jus because you ask for them.I am just saying, if you are going to make a broad statement like Max not being a good mod, and aren't willing to justify it, it's hardly a convincing case.
You are here to debate you said, right? In debate is someone generally supposed to substantiate a claim they make for anyone to reasonable buy into their arguments?
I'm glad Mike isn't him. I like this site. If you think Max is so great, go there. The site is still functioning.
This is a non-sequitur, I never argued that Max should be a mod here. Also I don't need him as a mod to enjoy a debating website. I am very good friends with him and talk to him almost daily outside of the website.
My point with all of this is that I think you are kind of an "anti-Airmax" ideologue, but again you are mis-directing your anger at him.