-->
@DebateArt.com
How do we see that a member is banned?
Dramart.com is rearing its head
Posts
Total:
55
Someone just felt a cold draft go through them.
-->
@vagabond
How do we see that a member is banned?
Ah good point. I'll add some indicator.
Owner of the board saying he was banned was good enough for me.
-->
@ethang5
And RM admitted as such a while ago.
-->
@Earth
Where did he admit it? On DDO, DI or email?
-->
@ethang5
He admitted he was banned on DDO
LOL, leave it to RM to be retarded enough to get himself banned from a site he self-proclaimed he was going to be the king of.
5 years now and he still hasn't learned his lesson. Pity.
-->
@Imabench
He is incapable of learning anything.
-->
@Zeichen
He's currently on DDO as Juggletheking or Juggletheboss ranting the exact same things.
You can sign in now with a new profile. It won't let you sign in with your old name or let you connect a new name with your old email.
The place will shortly be awash with old members with new names. Talk about a troll incentive.
-->
@ethang5
Yeah but some stone age nobody saying gods exist is good enough for you. Your standards are way short of mine.
Your standards are way short of mine.
They sure are. Which is why I don't have to pretend to be what I am not like you are struggling to do now.
You have never been able to see the stupidity of going to a religion board and shutting down every thread with a "there is no God".
The board is for people who want to discuss and debate theism anyway. They do not even have to be theists. You have been on DDO with the same croak for years. If you don't believe in god, fine. Let others who want to discuss Him have their say.
The fact that you never debate, say exactly the same thing every time, and contribute nothing to the discussion, shows you are a troll. And both theists and atheists think so.
As does your stalking behavior shows. What normal person posts more than 300 times unanswered to another who has told them they will ignore them? That certainly indicates an emotional problem.
You can stop being a troll. If you don't stop, you will be stopped. This new board offers you another chance. Your destiny here is in your hands.
-->
@ethang5
Once again, I do not think that is RM.
As for signing into DDO, my Zeichen account was active until this morning. My Draka and wonderful_dreams accounts are still open.
-->
@Zeichen
Yeah. It might be hari. Who knows?
-->
@ethang5
I disagree. I can think of at least one person who it could be, but I would rather not divulge his username.
-->
@Zeichen
I disagree. I can think of at least one person who it could be, but I would rather not divulge his username.
that's really spicy. What would I need to offer you to mention it in passing?
-->
@Smithereens
What would I need to offer you to mention it in passing?
A million dollars.
-->
@ethang5
Your hate and vitriol will see the end of you no matter how much you suck up to the new leader. You are transparent.
Hate, anger and vitriol are all you have.
-->
@DebateArt.com
@vagabond
Your hate and vitriol will see the end of you no matter how much you suck up to the new leader. You are transparent.Hate, anger and vitriol are all you have.
Stalking. Reported.
Not sure I really agree on banning rational on the grounds of being "unwanted" or "disliked". Subjective terminology such as "toxic" also being rather whimsical in relation to substantiation. Site owners have ultimate decision on the matter.
Other metrics such as:
-responsiveness
-trolling
Are subjective and therefore necessarily arbitrary criteria for such removal. The interactions between Rational and Zeichen both in this thread specifically would constitute as toxic and harmful for a variety of reasons, yet oddly, both are not banned. Obviously this criteria is not just rationally arbitrary , but in practice is showing to be as such, and given that, can only be deemed as unjust, both in theory and practical application.
"i care"
"I want to see site flourish"
Also subjective criteria and arbitrary distinctions. Also, it being rather irrelevant to adjudication. Both parties claim to care, both are operating against something they see as harmful to the site, such claims should be of no concern to jurisprudence.
Health of the site itself otherwise being a concern, banning individuals for arbitrary distinctions can neither be held to foster diversity of thought, or growth of userbase. Administrators that adjudicate removal on arbitrary grounds, particularly on a website with the purpose of intellectual and rational debate, would soon find themselves with jurisprudence over a rapidly shrinking, not growing, userbase 🙊
-->
@Buddamoose
Your last two comments are completely accurate.
Justice enacted by popularity and whims is no justice.
437 days later
hehe
-->
@Smithereens
well you wanna come back and see it now u aussie man
Dramart.com is rearing its head
Just noticed last night that this exists now:
Totally unrelated to everything that has been going on over the last week I am sure...