Does anyone have extra biblical evidence of this?

Read the OP and try again.

Ok - Please  Let me explain the circularity of the question in a causal nexus.

 

After Solomon left the earth, the surrounding nations became more influential in enticing the Hebrews to serve other Gods and they began to mary foreign pagan woman.   The Hebrews became complacent and began to let down their guard.

 

Other mighty nations began to attack the Hebrews and steal their treasures, gold and wealth and eventually soon thereafter took them into captivity.  The pagan nations around Israel simply did not record history to entail and describe their success, trade, business and financial involvement with Israel. / Solomon  -  Their history and recorded accounts of the details were rewritten by the dominant Syrians, Assyrians, Babylonians and Persians, and later the Romans.     They even changed the name of Israel to be called Palestine. 

 

Why would these series of reigning kingdoms and dominating governments write the History of the Hebrews in any

accurate  accountability    .  ?    They even changed the names of the Hebrew prisoners and gave them new names.  

Have You ever noticed that Daniel was given a New Name while a prisoner in     

       -    - Daniels new name was Belteshazzar.

 

- Hebrew 1095 בּלטשׁאצּר  bêlṭesha'tstsar   /    bale-tesh-ats-tsar'.

 

Notice the ending on the name is - Tsar or Cesar.  -    They wanted Daniel to serve with the Monks or Enochs in Baal Worship. So they NAMED Daniel The Name - BAAL Tesh CESAR.    

They  kidnapped     the     Hebrews and forced them to change their very names into pagan names that represented their Pagan ideas and Pagan gods. and they were expected to rewrite their own identity and history and their very names  - as Daniel was forced to serve as - a technical -  

technician / assistant

  - in Baal Worship. - = Tech / Tesh to BAAL     

 

 = BAAL / Tesh / Tech CESAR / Tsar...         Belteshazzar.   -      

The Bible - says here in Dan 4:8 - that Daniels name was

re-recorded  and erased and changed to represent the name of the god of Babylon

 

 Dan 4:7 Then came in the magicians, the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers: and I told the dream before them; but they did not make known unto me the interpretation thereof.  :8  But at the last Daniel came in before me, whose name was Belteshazzar, according to the name of my god,........

 

If they are changing peoples names, stealing their identity, their goods, treasures, gold and religious articles and forcing them to convert and worship their gods and unite with their government -  what leads You to believe that the Syrians, Assyrians, Babylonians and Persians, and later the Romans who all tried repeatedly   to erase continually erase and destroy  the Hebrew identity and  history  - why would they accurately / honestly  leave a historical record about any history of these things.   The Roman Catholic Church did not produce a Bible Translation into Latin /  Italian until nearly 500 years after Christ -  and then -  The Catholic Church did not produce a bible into any other language on the entire planet into any other language other than that Latin / Italian  -  until nearly 2000 years after Yahoshua.   Do You see a gaping

pattern  ?

   -    A  chemical reaction of the mind of pagan kings to produce an alternative history or to completely void all history to serve their sustained entity.  ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So you either don't understand the OP or you just refuse too, you obviously don't have anything relevant to say.

I am truly sorry for being rude.  I did not intend to disrespect You and Your great forum, please accept my sincere apology.

 I realise I was wrong by not addressing the question that You asked. I should have been more considerate and honorable, instead of just posting a long list of unrelated information.  Please relax, and feel at ease and try to forgive me, and I promise I will take the time at this moment to reflect on my actions now and I will go to the Bible and take a closer look to see if I can see any extra biblical evidence surrounding your forum question.
Thank You for being patient.

You were right - I found no other Biblical information about this particular event     Other than all of the other listed details related to other the situation that Solomon was in and who He was and His riches and overly abundant wealthy exploits.   It seems very possible that it did happen in light of the many surrounding details concerning Solomon.   He lived this life in the bible and there are many other details about these riches and wealth and gold, silver and fame that surrounded Him.   But nothing additionally repeated about the event that You asked about.

Now all you need to do is understand what the term "extra biblical" means and you can stop using biblical references and making an absolute fool of yourself.

There is no evidence that they didnt.

DURRRH

It's the truth. Lack of evidence is not proof it didn't happen. Besides, the Old Testament is a historical record. It has never been proven wrong in anything it says. There have been 17,000 archaeological discoveries concerning Scripture. Do you know how many of them contradicted Scripture? Not a single one.

The OT is a propagandist fictional history created during the Babylonian captivity. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence of 4 million people living for forty years in a very small desert, the exodus is a lie. That is all that's needed to disregard the rest of the book.

Actually, it was only 2.4 milion. And it wasn't a desert. It was called a wilderness.

???

And there is absolutely no evidence it ever happened. Your extrapolated numbers are no more correct than mine and completely meaningless.

No evidence? Sure there is. Or we wouldn't be discussing this. It's in the Old Testament...which has never been proven wrong in anything it says. It doesn't really matter what you believe. God is real, and you are going to hell unless you repent and ask God to forgive you. 

I see the term extra biblical is bamboozling you. Never mind, a child afraid of hell needs to learn a lot.

From the OT.

Just proved it wrong, that was easy.

Once again, you display your ignorance for all to see. Here is why you are wrong. You could have taken a minute to look this up and save yourself some embarrassment.

You said "I do accept there are contradictions between Matthew and Luke concerning the genealogies."

If you're referring to the genealogy of Christ, there is no conflict. I can't believe that one is still floating around, like a bad fart.

How pathetic.

Most certainly.

God incited David

deleted for lack of relevance.

Once again god incited David.

Provide chapter and verse that supports this fiction.

They can't both be true.

"MOST PROBABLY" Provide chapter and verse that supports this fiction.

I have to wonder why you are debating this. You don't believe in God. It's like someone debating what Santa had for breakfast.

Scares the shit outa ya, your OT is proved wrong and I can provide 1000 more proofs of it being wrong and you can't support your  claim of inerrancy at all. I'm not talking about your pretend friend I'm discussing your book of lies.

I'm not scared. I know that when I die I'll be with my Lord and Savior...Jesus Christ. You can argue until you're blue in the face. It will change nothing. Your words will not prevent one single person from accepting Christ. It is an exercise in futility. You will die alone, and you will spend eternity alone in solitary torment.

And I bet Jesus is really looking forward to spending eternity with you, too.

Yes. He is.

So you can find no extra biblical mention of this Solomon and his great empire, it is propaganda, pure and simple.

Book of WISDOM ?.....what price for Wisdom....none.....

Only Parasite Vampires seek the tangible....?????????? Where...does wisdom reside....= solution

The Bible seems to become significantly less interesting when viewed in the light of interpreting it as literal and historical truth rather than literary metaphor such as was clearly the intent of the various authors of the Old Testament.

I found this very interesting page on Wikipedia.