U.S. gas prices plunge toward $3 a gallon - Thanks Joe Biden!

Author: IwantRooseveltagain

Posts

Total: 116
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,307
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Russia wouldn’t have invaded under Trump. 
True, because Trump was doing more damage to NATO than Putin could do himself.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,307
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Who did that? Seems like you are tilting at windmills again. Haven't seen anyone who claimed this.
You are stupid. 20 times a day on any conservative media you can hear some Republican blaming Biden for high gas prices, especially in the run up to Election Day.

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Double_R
So is it just coincidence that global food and gas costs skyrocketed during the same time period? Please enlighten me.
Gladly.

Here are 25 decisions the president has made over the last year that have affected gas prices, home heating costs, and other energy-related burdens U.S. families and businesses face.
#1 and 2: Adopting new EPA oil and gas rules
In November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency 
announced new regulations governing methane emissions from oil and gas production, transmission, storage, and distribution that would cost more than $1 billion a year.
Last spring, Biden signed a resolution that overturned Trump administration reforms to EPA oil and gas rules. This resolution will 
worsen energy poverty, reestablish burdensome regulations, and have a disproportionate impact on small businesses.
#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8: Restricting or impeding energy projects
One of Biden’s first actions after taking office was to 
halt new oil and gas leases on federal lands and waters, the Biden administration has delayed decisions on these leases  — a move that results in higher energy costs for the most vulnerable consumers.
The administration 
canceled the Keystone XL pipeline and suspended oil and gas leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and New Mexico (despite opposition from the Navajo Nation). It also resurrected the “Waters of the United States” rule, which would increase barriers to energy projects.
The White House is 
pursuing new standards for particulate matter and ozone, likely tightening them to unachievable levels for much of the country and creating new barriers for energy project permits.
The president also has 
rescinded Endangered Species Act reforms, a move that will increase red tape and allow litigation to slow down energy projects.
#9: Rejoining the Paris agreement
In April 2021, without the consent of Congress, Biden rejoined the Paris agreement, which 
will result in onerous new regulations that could raise energy costs.
#10: Appointing unaccountable energy regulators
The president has created several bodies within the White House charged with creating new policies to regulate energy. The people who run these councils are unelected and do not need Senate confirmation, but they have been given 
broad powers to come up with new executive actions — which do not need consent from Congress — to regulate U.S. energy production.
#11: Forcing states to restrict driving
One section of the recently enacted Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, supported by the White House, would 
require every U.S. state to develop state carbon-reduction plans that must be approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation as well as be updated every four years.
These plans are aimed at reducing driving all over the country — even for people in rural areas where public transportation is limited, and driving is the only option.
#12, #13, and #14: Raising the prices of cars and trucks
The Biden 
administration has failed to take adequate action on annual requirements and small refinery waivers for the Renewable Fuel Standard and in providing regulatory relief from this biofuel mandate due to economic hardship. His EPA  has finalized a new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. That single regulation could raise the average vehicle price by $1,000.
#15: Instituting a new policy on carbon taxes in organized wholesale electricity markets
This 
carbon pricing policy statement, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in April 2021, is a blanket endorsement of top-down policies that have been demonstrated to be costly, ineffective, regressive, and consistently rejected by the American people.
#16: Raising the prices of common household necessities
The EPA has issued a final rule to phase out a common, inexpensive refrigerant. This policy is a 
de facto tax on air conditioning and refrigeration.
#17: Stifling energy innovation
In May 2021, Biden issued a sweeping executive order that mobilized federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, to enforce mandates on businesses, insurers, retirement funds, and suppliers. These policies 
will stifle innovation critical to improving the environment and will increase costs for a wide variety of businesses.
#18: Altering regulatory cost analyses
The Biden administration has 
changed key inputs for economic and regulatory analysis, including raising the “social cost” of greenhouse gases. These policies will mask the true consumer cost of regulatory actions.
#19 and #20: Imposing new costs on power generation
The administration attempted to resurrect an aggressive version of the Clean Power Plan for power sector mandates called the 
Clean Electricity Standard.
In the 
Fall 2021 Unified Agenda, the EPA stated their intention to propose what can be considered the Clean Power Plan 2.0. This policy would impose burdensome regulations but would have little or no environmental benefit.
The EPA also has mandated that even facilities with reduced emissions must remain on the list of “major” sources, 
subjecting these facilities to permitting burdens and higher costs.
#21: Impeding Americans exports
The administration is 
considering potential restrictions on the export of crude oil that would increase, not decrease, energy prices.
#22 and #23: Raising taxes
More than one-quarter of the administration-backed Build Back Better agenda is pulled directly from the “Green New Deal.” The Build Back Better agenda 
includes new taxes on natural gas and home heating. It also includes new taxes on petroleum and manufacturing.
#24: Picking energy winners and losers
The Build Back Better agenda 
would spend taxpayer dollars to push utilities to adopt more costly, politically preferred forms of energy, a move that would reduce Americans’ energy choices.
#25: Fueling the fire for future regulation
Finally, through the Civilian Climate Corps, Build Back Better 
would fund the salaries of tens of thousands of anti-energy activists who would perpetuate high energy costs by demanding new and costly federal regulations and legislation.
Unlike releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, these 25 steps are not just a “drop in the ocean.”
They have made, and will continue to make, a significant impact on Americans’ ability to afford the energy products that fuel their liv
es and livelihoods.

"The national average for a gallon of gas for Americans has risen to $4.86, $0.80 cents higher than it was in March.
As Americans return to work and plan summer vacations they are faced with rising gas prices. (Not to mention higher costs for electricity, home heating, and groceries!!)
The price at the pump and for home expenses began to rise before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. At the end of 2021, President Joe Biden announced the U.S. Department of Energy will release 50 million barrels of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Energy experts told PBS interviewers that tapping the SPR won’t drive down gas prices. The decision was little more than “a drop in the ocean” when it comes to energy policy, one person said.
The decision also won’t counteract Biden administration policies that have caused rising energy costs — and that will continue to drive prices higher in the future."

Yes, global prices have been rising, but not at this rate. Biden has made decisions, that have been proven to directly cause an influx of gas, and food prices. Global price rase has only had a small effect on the country. The rest is from the Biden Administrations bad decisions.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
True, because Trump was doing more damage to NATO than Putin could do himself.
Elaborate please. I would really like to hear what you have to say about this.

You are stupid. 20 times a day on any conservative media you can hear some Republican blaming Biden for high gas prices, especially in the run up to Election Day.
Actually, it's the opposite. You hear more Democratic media, because of the bias of the Media, more than you hear conservative media. Why?
Because they want to silence the truth for their own benefit.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
 You can’t blame Biden for high gas prices merely because he is the president, and then when prices go down claim he had nothing to do with it.
Contradiction?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,307
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Americans for Prosperity (AFP), founded in 2004, is a libertarian conservative political advocacy group in the United States funded by Charles Koch and formerly his brother David.[6] As the Koch brothers' primary political advocacy group, it is one of the most influential American conservative organizations.

Talk about politically biased sources of information. This is from a literal political advocacy group. Plus, the Koch’s have a financial incentive to favor fossil fuel energy sources. That’s their business model.

I thought you said you refuse to consider politically biased news.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
I thought you said you refuse to consider politically biased news.
I said I refuse to consider politically biased news, that don't put down facts. 
The media can say all it wants, but when it comes down to it, facts is all that matters.


Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,353
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
So is it just coincidence that global food and gas costs skyrocketed during the same time period? Please enlighten me.
Gladly.

This isn’t enlightening. Correlation =/= Causation.

Everyone knows that Biden’s policies are not as lenient towards the oil and gas industry as they would like, that doesn’t mean he is single-handedly responsible for the increases. Again, if you know anything about the oil industry you’d know it is a global market, no US President could make that kind of impact.

If you really want to make the argument that Biden’s policies are entirely or even mostly to blame you need to start by quantifying them, if you can’t do that then you are just pulling it out of your ass while ignoring the obvious factors;

“In an email to us, he acknowledged that “there is an adversarial relationship between” Biden’s administration and oil and gas companies, and that the administration “has stumbled with its messaging.” But, Kloza said, most of the surge in gasoline prices can be attributed to just three factors: the “huge global bounce back from COVID” and the closure or reconfiguration of some oil refineries in the U.S. and Canada; the Russian invasion of Ukraine; and the 2020 formation of OPEC Plus, an alliance between the 13-member Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and a separate group of 10 non-OPEC members, including Russia.”

Yes, global prices have been rising, but not at this rate. 
Citation please

Global price rase has only had a small effect on the country.
You do know that oil is a global market right?

Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,353
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You can’t blame Biden for high gas prices merely because he is the president, and then when prices go down claim he had nothing to do with it.
Contradiction?
Take note of the bold.

If Biden being president is the only fact you need to know in order to blame high gas prices on him, then it’s the only fact you need to credit him with low gas prices.

The contradiction would be pretending that presidents are in complete control of gas prices when their up but not when their down.

Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,353
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
True, because Trump was doing more damage to NATO than Putin could do himself.
Elaborate please. I would really like to hear what you have to say about this.
NATO is an alliance between member countries based on a pledge that if one member country gets attacked the others will jump to their defense. Such an organization can only be effective if the members trust not only the current leaders of member countries, but also future leaders. Without that trust the entire alliance falls apart.

Trump has done tremendous damage to this trust. Not only did he give great reason for other member states to doubt that he would defend them, but he also managed to drag half the country into buying his ridiculous anti-NATO rhetoric. This gives NATO members very good reason to worry about the future of the alliance even if the current president is a staunch and vocal supporter.

Putin could never have accomplished this. The only way NATO would be destroyed is from within. This is perhaps the single biggest reason Putin fought so hard to get Trump elected. The other is because of Trump’s hostility towards the constitution and democracy itself. There is nothing Putin would love better than to destroy democracy around the globe. But again, he could never accomplish this on his own, he needed someone to do it from within. Trump is Putin’s dream candidate, which is the case because Putin’s ultimate goal is to destroy America and every nation like it. This should make every American who claims to be a Trump supporting patriot think, unfortunately that’s not likely.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Everyone knows that Biden’s policies are not as lenient towards the oil and gas industry as they would like, that doesn’t mean he is single-handedly responsible for the increases.
Yes of course not single handedly, but the decisions he has made, have increased the gas prices more than they could have been, if he hadn't made stupid decisions.

Again, if you know anything about the oil industry you’d know it is a global market, no US President could make that kind of impact.
Which is surprising, because not a lot of the U.S. presidents in history have made this much of an impact. I am not looking to blame Biden for the full increase of gas, but to blame him for making prices exponentially worse than they could have been.
The White House has tried to deflect blame for the insane surge in gas prices onto Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. And, to be fair, gas prices are definitely not completely within any president’s control. They absolutely are influenced by global factors, and the disruption in the global energy market caused by Putin’s invasion certainly has contributed to higher prices.
But Biden isn’t off the hook. Gas prices started rising long before the invasion, and the president still has direct responsibility for how his policies have contributed to this problem.
Here are three specific things Biden has done that have led to increased gas prices.

1. Canceling Drilling Leases and Limiting Domestic Production
Since taking office, Biden has taken too many steps to count to limit domestic production. These include halting federal permits for oil and gas drilling and leasing shortly after taking office and blocking drilling in a major oil-rich Alaskan region.
To be clear, these decisions will mostly affect future production. But that does still significantly affect gas prices because companies factor in their expectations about the future into the decisions they make today.
“Some say that new leases … would have taken time and would not yet be online, but even so, there is evidence that expectations of increased future supply has a beneficial impact on current prices and expectations of future supply drying up has a negative impact on current prices,” the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Ben Lieberman said.
“At a day-to-day level, I am hearing from drillers that they are having a very hard time getting all the approvals they need from [the Environmental Protection Agency] and other agencies in order to produce on existing wells, and of course, new federal leasing has come to a halt,” Lieberman added.
It’s just basic economics that when the government throttles future supply in an industry, that will lead to higher prices both now and in the future. Biden was warned by many critics at the time that this would happen, but he proceeded anyway.
2. Choking Regulations that Impose Big Costs and Lead to Higher Prices
Speaking of basic economics, it’s well established that when businesses’ costs rise, that puts upward pressure on the prices they charge consumers. The oil and gas industry is no exception.


And unfortunately, the Biden administration has both proposed and implemented a wide array of regulations on the energy sector, inflicting billions in direct financial costs and incalculable indirect compliance costs — plus further harming expectations for the future.
“The regulatory chokehold imposed by the Biden administration on oil production in place of a Green New Deal has drastically raised gasoline prices, thereby hurting lower-income people the most,” said conservative economist Vance Ginn, who served in the Trump administration.
“This is yet another example of the high cost of big-government environmentalism when the better approach is to remove government barriers so that free markets can better let people adapt to changes in the environment at a much lower cost,” Ginn concluded.
3. Anti-Energy Rhetoric that Discourages Investment
Rhetoric matters. While words don’t literally do anything to change gas prices, the signals coming from policymakers absolutely do affect the long-term investment decisions businesses make.
And even as a presidential candidate, Biden sent very negative messages about what his leadership would mean for the gas industry.
In just one example, as Americans for Tax Reform pointed out, Biden said during a campaign stop: “We are going to get rid of fossil fuels. … We’re going to phase out fossil fuels.” Then, upon taking office, the president followed these words with actions such as canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, blocking leases, restricting imports, and pursuing regulations.
In general, Biden’s open hostility toward the oil and gas industry has almost certainly curbed investment into production that otherwise would’ve occurred.
“Such extinction rhetoric, coming from the now-president, has an unprecedented chilling effect on investment,” Lieberman said. To put it simply, less investment means less supply — which means higher prices.
It’s absolutely true that our high gas prices aren’t entirely Biden’s fault. But the president is not the helpless bystander his defenders would have you believe.
So yes, a majority has been caused because of outside Global oil industries, but Biden is still to blame for these insane gas prices, given that they could have been lowered exponentially.

Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,353
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I am not looking to blame Biden for the full increase of gas, but to blame him for making prices exponentially worse than they could have been.
Except that you don't seem to be able to define what "exponentially" even means.

Again, the debate isn't whether gas prices have been negatively affected by Biden's policies, everyone knows thay have, that's the cost of protecting the environment. The debate is to what extent is he responsible, or to put it more simply, whether he is to blame for the fact that we are seeing record surges. Pointing to policy X and saying "well policy X theoretically raises prices" is not an argument that he is *primarily* responsible. To make that case you'd actually need to quantify the impact of them. And no matter how many times I ask for this no one will even try, which I find very telling.

Take the keystone pipeline for example. People point to this as another example of why Biden is to blame. Yet when you actually look into the details; the pipeline wouldn't have been even finished being built yet, it transports oil not produces more of it, the amount of oil it would have transported was a drop in the bucket compared to daily US consumption, and here's the kicker... The majority of that oil was  likely to be shipped overseas.

So when you start to do the math, this is practically irrelevant. But, it's one more factoid right wing propagandists can use to sell their narrative. Add a handful more of these seemingly significant but practically meaningless examples and you have a narrative that sounds great but doesn't seem to match to reality.

So either we can sit and quantify all of these examples or we can just step back and look at the big picture. COVID essentially shut down the entire global oil industry causing many refineries to go out of business. Those closures are permanent, so the ability to produce on a global scale was drastically reduced. Once we moved passed it global demand returned almost overnight but supply is no longer suited for the task. There is no Biden policy you can point to that comes anywhere close to this scale of devistation. It's not even comparable. Tack on the war in Russia and it all makes perfect sense that we'd see such increases, you don't need bad US policies to explain it.

And then there's the fact that the entire world is feeling the same pain, the explanation is pretty damn clear. It's a very simple Occam's razor test. Meanwhile your theory is that all of this global stuff is minimal compared to Biden (even though gas is a global market and the other countries are all going through the same thing) so you're essentially arguing that global gas prices are dictated by the US president. No oil expert would argue that.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
and the other countries are all going through..
You mean other countries that import oil instead of producing it locally. Gas prices are far cheaper in the countries that produce surplus oil.

For example, you can find gas below 3 dollars a gallon USD in most parts of Russia, and that is with a war going on.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,353
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
I am aware of all that. Do you have a point?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,307
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
So here’s what we should do now, while gas prices are low and everyone is a little calmer about the issue: Let’s promise ourselves and each other that the next time prices rise — as inevitably they will — we’ll try not to be so dumb about this subject.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
You just want global warming. You're no real corporate Democrat.

9 days later

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,307
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Gas prices keep dropping. Joe did that!

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Thanks Putin for exporting 8 million barrels of oil a day despite sanctions. You got rubles to pay for that? Petrodollars are no good here.


sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,948
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
TELL ME AGAIN HOW GAS PRICES ARE DICTATED BY SUPPLY AND DEMAND and not by govt and market manipulation.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@sadolite
TELL ME AGAIN HOW GAS PRICES ARE DICTATED BY SUPPLY AND DEMAND and not by govt and market manipulation
There was a sharp price hike at the start of government sanctions on Russian oil, but Putin has figured out how to get around the rules by selling directly to China.

USA can only manipulate the oil market so much before people find alternatives to the USA.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
It's worth noting under Biden that America is now fierce enemies with the 2 top global oil exporters. That was not the case at all in 2016.
Thanks Joe!
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@bmdrocks21
Last week, former NY Fed staffer Zoltan Pozsar sparked a shockwave across Wall Street when in his latest research piece, he suggested that as a result of the Ukraine war, which has resulted in a "commodity collateral" crisis (and which is quickly transforming into an old-school liquidity crisis), China's PBOC will soon emerge as a dominant central bank and as the commodity-backed yuan ascends to a position of power, the world's reserve currency, the dollar, would lose much of its global clout leading to even higher inflation across the western world:

This crisis is not like anything we have seen since President Nixon took the U.S. dollar off gold in 1971 – the end of the era of commodity-based money. When this crisis (and war) is over, the U.S. dollar should be much weaker and, on the flipside, the renminbi much stronger, backed by a basket of commodities.

Russia has already won the oil war in Ukraine. It learned from the war in Iraq,
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Back in the ‘70s, in the wake of the oil crisis, President Nixon devised a plan. He offered to help Saudi Arabia defend itself in exchange for the kingdom to trade all of its oil production in US dollars.
As a result, anyone looking to buy oil from the Saudis had to do so by paying in USD. This was a strategic stroke of genius that has helped cement the dollar as the world’s premier reserve currency ever since.
And while this certainly isn’t the only reason nations hold onto and trade in USD to this day, it is one of the most important…
More recently, though, this pact that created the petrodollar has become strained. The Saudis are no longer as close to the US as they once were. Years of political and diplomatic headbutting has frayed the relationship, and as such the petrodollar is in danger.
In fact, a few days ago news broke that discussion between the Saudis and China is developing. And while this isn’t the first time the pair have tried to dethrone the dollar, it is telling, nonetheless.
This, dear reader, could be the catalyst for the demise of the petrodollar.
And in its place, we may instead see the rise of the petroyuan. At least, that’s certainly what China is hoping for…
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@Greyparrot
Nixon really made the best out of a terrible situation. To save our gold reserves from being pillaged, had to take us off hold standard (a process started by FDR when he wanted money printer to go burrr. Same as today, the voters liked it).

And now his legacy is being lost. He pried China and Russia apart during the Cold War and put us on better terms with both. Now look where the schizophrenic Left has taken us just a few years after Obama criticized Romney for being anti-Russia, saying the Cold Was is over. Losing our power over oil.


#NixonNowMorethanEver!
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,330
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@bmdrocks21
Nixon could have just let the dollar crash though and hold the brrr money machine accountable before it learned to print 30 trillion dollars.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@Greyparrot
Trying to mess with the fed and their money printing would have got him JFK’d