Please reply to me using the receivers feature, as I can't see if you responded unless I manually check :)
Actually, that is misinformation. Watch the video of what happened.
Sorry for my misrepresentation/misunderstanding of the situation, I just quoted directly from the NYPost article you sent me.
This is one example of authority trying to silence social issues. Both Democrats and Republicans are known for this, this does not show that Democrats actively try to label everyone that even slightly disagrees with them as terrorist, fatphobic, racist, etc.
Democrats support the LGBTQ+ community, and this is what they are pushing in schools. It's not just extreme groups. It's the group as a whole.
You have to be VERY careful when generalizing an entire group and, in this case, you are not. Not all LGBTQ+ people are pushing for pornography in schools, in fact, very few are. So far, you have provided around five examples of egregious pornography in schools. These five examples CANNOT speak for the entirety of the LGBTQ+ community and the entirety of Democrats. Suggesting that most if not all Democrats want porn in schools is a claim that CANNOT be made.
For the first example, it is very vague how the LGBTQ+ Community is tied in. It only says that "others" want to keep the book out of solidarity for the LGBTQ+ community. Who are these others? I'd say you have to take anything Fox News (and CNN, on the opposing side) says with a grain of salt. These "others" could literally be anybody.
For the second example, it seems a majority of examples are only about transgenders. This is hardly anything related to pornography. I will address the rest in the next paragraph.
It seems there are a few books that are MAJOR problems throughout the articles you sent me. Flamer and Gender Queer are two that I keep seeing. These books again do not represent the majority of the LGBTQ+ community.
Let me make my position clear. Though I agree with teaching students about transgenderism and the LGBTQ+ community, I don't agree with showing children pictures of gay/lesbian sexual acts (I also don't agree with showing children pictures of straight sexual acts).
Look up Critical Race Theory. Something that Democrats are pushing to be a course in Colledge Campuses'.
Critical Race Theory doesn't suggest that all white people are born inherently racist, and they need to be taught not to be racist. The way I understand it, CRT is just a way to analyze how the "system" has adversely affected the colored community. I think there are some issues with CRT, but I'm sure it doesn't suggest anything along the lines of "All white people are racist."
[break]
At the end of this, I think that these statements were just generalizations of much more nuanced topics. I believe that you should have gone in way more depth, as the claims you make are entirely false. You are misrepresenting the intentions and actions of the democrats by only considering a select few extremists and generalizing complex topics too hastily.
Thus, I think this forum post only exists to spread hatred for the opposing side. I believe that you can hate the democratic party, if you have gone to great lengths to weigh and understand their intentions and actions. And, simply convincing yourself of well-known republican talking points isn't a great way to go to do so.
