Lamba vs Beta ContinuedLet's do the naming thing first.Beta males on DarC (this term is severely negatively portrayed by the media and by people like Outplayz, it's not negative it's one of many variants, to be honest it is kind of negative like the Gamma male is but this is my honest observation)...PGA2.0, secularmerlin and SamStevens.Beta females on the site include WarriorQueenForever but no other prominent female member that I know of on this site is one.The idea behind the Beta's ethos is possibly the single most misportrayed and misunderstood concept in the history of humankind. Betas are natural audience members. They are not natural servants. This is extremely important to understand because until you realise that none of these types other than the Lambda, willingly serve and giggle while doing it, you won't understand why Betas feel continually humiliated and jeered for what they are. Betas are first Deltas. No one is born Beta. My theory on this is that the Delta that realises there's many dominant, interesting humans out there to watch, listen to and go along with ends up becoming Beta. On the other hand, if the being simply goes 'meh, others aren't every that great but I do like going with the flow' they end up being Deltas. Betas do not 'go with the flow' they do not 'serve alphas' they actively seek out alphas to entertain them. Beta humans are not weak for being what they are, in fact none of these types are weak for being what they are. Betas are built to thoroughly yearn for a 'show', for a 'battle' but not ever one involving them. Shit-stirrers can be Sigmas, Gammas or Betas but the Beta does it out of compulsion... They just love it. They don't mean to hurt people, they mean to enjoy a show is all. The Beta tends to be consistently inconsistent. Unlike any other type, the Betas actually have the most variance, not least variance, among them. A beta's upbringing, information they came across as children... Education... All of that, is almost entirely what shapes their worldview and opinions. They actively enjoy taking in things and not questioning them, "why fight what is likely from something wiser and more entertaining than I am?" asks the Beta on a daily basis. They don't submit out of fear, they submit out of truly enjoying the path of least resistance. Cowards? That's suggesting we are supposed to be brave. Sigmas are (it rhymes) enigmas in that they are able to be both confrontational and yet cunning deep down. Sigmas, Gammas and Betas all are coward-variants whereas alphas, omegas and zetas are brave-variants with alphas and omegas being brash-flavoured-brave and zetas being passive-aggressive-brave.
I don't follow. Are you making an analogy of different worldviews, Beta being Christian?