-->
@Plisken
Do you see the word "unjustified" in that process being conflated with murder? The point is that there is not an inherent reason to justify the killing, in order for the legislature, and the court to not have sufficient proof that it's justified in throwing you in the slammer. Justification is a process.
You lost me.
Are you trying to argue that all instances of humans killing humans intentionally are automatically justified (the soldier example)?
Or are you trying to argue that all instances of humans killing humans intentionally are automatically murder unless and until some justification process determines otherwise?