Pentagon Looking at Sending F16s to Ukraine

Author: Reece101

Posts

Total: 5
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,904
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
Yay or nay? 

Russia is already being attacked behind their boarder. These F16s will give Ukraine more capability to do so, therefor escalating the war further. Although Russias air defence systems are meant to be some of the best in the world when it comes to intercepting missiles and aircraft. It might dissuade Ukraine from wandering too close to Russian airspace. 

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Reece101
It's a difficult decision. 

I think that it would be nice to help Ukraine with Russia. But President Zelenskyy has been using us as a tool to help for long. 
I think that we should be focused more on the border problem, and our security, before we worry about another countries security. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 266
Posts: 7,358
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
There is no any indication that the war is winnable for Ukraine. A dozen new aircrafts wont change that.
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
This might explain why the Ukraine is trying to goat Iran into attacking them. 
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,243
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Reece101
Yay?

At some point Russia { resource rich } and Ukraine { bread basket } will have to come to terms of a settlement to live side by side.

As far my limited understanding goes, Crimea belongs to Ukraine --no nuclear weapons as they voluntarily got rid of them-- and they intend to take Crimea it back. I was wrong so far in guessing Putin would get all he wanted in Ukraine, but  my guess is, that, Crimea will not get back in Ukraine's hands any time soon.

This conflict is far from over and how crazy{?} daring can those with the nuclear weapons behave?

Muslims >< Hindi's  ---south Asia large nuclear powder keg---

Muslims >< Jews/USA   ---semi-nuclear middle-east powder keg---

USA/North Korea >< South Korea  ---nuclear powder keg----

Human destroying the ecological environment that sustains them via greedy, non-cooperative humans.

My original end-date-for-humanity prognostication calculations { see bottom of page }  were 2015. Instead of adding 7  generations { 210 years } Ive gone with a give or take 50 years prognostication, ergo, 2065 is added on maximum of 50 years.

Recently I realized, that, it may be more correct prognostication to say 2015,  give or take 50 years, ergo, 2015 plus maximum 50 years is 2065.

Calculations for end-date-for-humanity is  as follows, via ebuc's calculations { give or take 50 years } , and does not include any rate of growth changes:

1} Pi-time { absolute/cosmic }  66.4 * 3 { triangulation is to get a fix on a location }, = 199.2

2} 199.2^2 = 39,680.64 { spherical area surface growth  } = 39,680....... --4 * Pi * radius^2 = surface area growth ----

4} 39,680  * 186000 { speed-of-radiation } = 7,380,599,040

5} and that that resultant value  { 7,380,599,040 } is coincidentally, very close to the numerical value of humans on Earth in 2015 { 7,379,797,139 },

7379797139 ---ebuc calculation factors---
7380599040 --human population estimate 2015--
----------------
.......801,901 differrence

..."...The current population increase is estimated at 67 million people per year.".....

"population in the world is, as of 2022, growing at a rate of around 0.84% per year (down from 1.05% in 2020, 1.08% in 2019, 1.10% in 2018, and 1.12% in 2017). "..

.." Annual growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at around 2%. The rate of increase has nearly halved since then, and will continue to decline in the coming years."...