The Biden Crime Family is exposed each &amp; every day - Truth always prevails!!

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.09.2023 07:33PM

3

7

02.09.2023 07:33PM

https://youtu.be/a4iwc0vCZJo

Senator Grassley and Johnson’s investigation into Biden Inc criminality highly detailed here in this hearing statement.

It is clear that the Biden’s and all their co-conspirators did as Grassley laid out. An FBI agent was caught conspiring with foreign agents that ties that FBI agent to Hunter and the Biden family.

If the Biden Criminal Organization can disrupt a 4 year term of a sitting president with constant barrages of illicit and fallacious attacks, effectively setting that POTUS up for failure, it is more than plausible and more probable that they also conspired to rig the 2020 election (which is more or less self-evident at this point).

As these hearings continue, more truth will see the light of day and the snakes in the swamp will continue to be exposed.

This country is on the brink of total ruin if our government and GOP do not get their act together and clean house from the very TOP to the lowest basement level. That is a fact that cannot be disputed. Neither can the fact that the CCP has every hand, tooth and nail dug deep into our country on multiple levels.

Things for America and our way of life are at serious risk, and if something doesn’t change soon…that movie Red Dawn may become a very reality present day.

#2

Debates: 0

Posts: 6,115

3

6

02.10.2023 01:43AM

3

6

02.10.2023 01:43AM

That’s a lie. Grassley is a liar. No jacket Jordan is a wack job.

Right off the bat Grassley lied about Crossfire Hurricane. That was investigated by Bill Barr’s Special Counsel John Durham for years and and he got zero convictions.

Grassley is ready for a nursing home. What a rambling rant.

FBI Director Ray, appointed by Trump, just laughs at these Bozos and won’t give them any serious consideration.

#3

Debates: 0

Posts: 6,115

3

6

02.10.2023 02:00AM

3

6

02.10.2023 02:00AM

I’ve been told that Chuck Grassley has a long history of molesting little boys. I don’t know if it’s true, but that’s what has been alleged to me. You have to admit he resembles those Catholic priests who were known to be child molesters.

Topic's author

#4

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.10.2023 05:05AM

3

7

02.10.2023 05:05AM

-->

@IwantRooseveltagain

Prove it. Prove it. Prove it. Prove it. Prove it.

We all know you cannot prove ANY of your fallacious claims. So, as well already know, you’re the resident forum liberal Democrat LIAR-IN-CHIEF!! 🖕🏿

#5

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.10.2023 05:51AM

3

2

4

02.10.2023 05:51AM

-->

@TWS1405_2

It is clear that the Biden’s and all their co-conspirators did as Grassley laid out. An FBI agent was caught conspiring with foreign agents that ties that FBI agent to Hunter and the Biden family.

If the Biden Criminal Organization can disrupt a 4 year term of a sitting president with constant barrages of illicit and fallacious attacks, effectively setting that POTUS up for failure, it is more than plausible and more probable that they also conspired to rig the 2020 election (which is more or less self-evident at this point).

This seems like conspiratorial babble. In your own words, Prove it. Prove it. Prove it. Prove it. Prove it.

Topic's author

#6

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.10.2023 12:10PM

3

7

02.10.2023 12:10PM

-->

@dustryder

It’s ALL common knowledge. As such, it doesn’t require proof.

Oh, and it’s clear you didn’t even take the time to watch the video. Which is in and of itself, proof.

#7

Debates: 3

Posts: 4,236

3

2

5

02.10.2023 01:10PM

3

2

5

02.10.2023 01:10PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

It’s ALL common knowledge. As such, it doesn’t require proof.

All claims require evidence before they can be taken seriously. The fact that this filth has spread all throughout right wing eco chambers across America does not change that.

Oh, and it’s clear you didn’t even take the time to watch the video. Which is in and of itself, proof.

Chuck Grassley making a bunch of claims is not proof of anything. The fact that he was reading them off of a paper again, does not change that.

Topic's author

#8

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.10.2023 05:22PM

3

7

02.10.2023 05:22PM

-->

@Double_R

Even the leftist media has been reporting on the investigative results. They cannot deny the truth, it only makes them look bad. As if they could make themselves look anymore worse than they already are. But they have been flipping on the democrats, Biden and the FBI as of late.

Clearly you live in either a plastic bubble or have your head in the sand! It’s common knowledge. It’s all over the internet and MSM, both sides. More on the truth telling side than the lying side, but it’s still there too.

You don’t want evidence. You want cliff notes.

Grassley made no claims. He stated facts. And everyone reads off paper or a teleprompter. Such a stupid comment to make on your part.

#9

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.10.2023 05:35PM

3

2

4

02.10.2023 05:35PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Topic's author

#10

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.10.2023 07:48PM

3

7

02.10.2023 07:48PM

-->

@dustryder

“Common knowledge does not need to be cited in your paper, because it is widely known, undisputed, easily verified, and generally not attributable to a specific author.”

#11

Debates: 3

Posts: 4,236

3

2

5

02.10.2023 08:22PM

3

2

5

02.10.2023 08:22PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

So once again, you make a claim that you refuse to explain, then tell everyone who asks you to support your BS to go watch a YouTube video.

Why are you here? What is your point on this site?

#12

Debates: 0

Posts: 6,115

3

6

02.10.2023 09:06PM

3

6

02.10.2023 09:06PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

Grassley made no claims. He stated facts.

Facts? Grassley’s facts go like this - “it has been alleged to me…

“And just because we used Russian disinformation to conduct our investigation doesn’t mean people should be mean to us, laugh at us and disregard our

effort. And then we were set up. It wasn’t fair! It wasn’t fair. Everyone laughed at us! I’m a senior goddamit!” “the Democrats asked my witness about Russian disinformation, thereby introducing Russian disinformation into the record”

So it’s a fact some people are saying TWS is a moron - that’s proof you are a moron. It’s a fact.

#13

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.10.2023 09:11PM

3

2

4

02.10.2023 09:11PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

“Common knowledge does not need to be cited in your paper, because it is widely known, undisputed, easily verified, and generally not attributable to a specific author.”

1. You are citing the requirements for academic papers, not persuasive argument or fruitful discussion.

2. None of the assertions you've made are widely known, undisputed and easily verified.

The fact you seem to think the assertion that there is a Biden criminal organisation that disrupted Trumps presidency and probably rigged the 2020 is widely known, undisputed and easily verified is easily the most dumbest thing that I've ever encountered on this site.

Topic's author

#14

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 12:03AM

3

7

02.11.2023 12:03AM

-->

@Double_R

So once again you refuse to watch/read information provided by a DART member with the intent to educate others and initiate a discussion.

Your laziness knows no bounds. Your denialism is infinite. You expect everyone else to do your work for you. Even if they drew you a damn picture you'd still ask for cliff notes.

Why are you here? What is your point on this site?

Right back at ya, fucking clown.

Topic's author

#15

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 12:06AM

3

7

02.11.2023 12:06AM

-->

@dustryder

->@TWS1405_2
“Common knowledge does not need to be cited in your paper, because it is widely known, undisputed, easily verified, and generally not attributable to a specific author.”
1. You are citing the requirements for academic papers, not persuasive argument or fruitful discussion.

2. None of the assertions you've made are widely known, undisputed and easily verified.

The fact you seem to think the assertion that there is a Biden criminal organisation that disrupted Trumps presidency and probably rigged the 2020 is widely known, undisputed and easily verified is easily the most dumbest thing that I've ever encountered on this site.

LOL!! It's a general definition, and even then, it applies to all things asserted. Even here. In an online discussion forum.

If I say the sky is self evidently blue, which IS common knowledge, you'd still ask for evidence.

Yes, every assertion I made in the OC are widely known (to the educated who actually make an effort to stay abreast of world events), the left's dispute is bunk, so it remains undisputed, and it is easily verifiable.

Are you related to Double_R? Doppleganger perhaps? Cause you act/behave JUST LIKE HIM (her, it, they, Z).

Topic's author

#16

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 12:07AM

3

7

02.11.2023 12:07AM

-->

@IwantRooseveltagain

Your greatest hits - psychological projection

#17

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.11.2023 01:17AM

3

2

4

02.11.2023 01:17AM

-->

@TWS1405_2

to the educated who actually make an effort to stay abreast of world events

So not widely known.

the left's dispute is bunk

So it is in dispute

This is just lazy. If you want people to swallow your propaganda, do better.

Topic's author

#18

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 02:13AM

3

7

02.11.2023 02:13AM

-->

@dustryder

So not widely known.

When it’s ALL OVER THE INTERNET & MSM, yeah, it meets the definition of widely know AND easily verifiable.

So it is in dispute

No, not really. The only ones disputing anything is the left. The fbi. The democrats. All those who would be ostracized for their illicit activities. Which is precisely why the FBI and democrats (like Schiff) kept espousing Russian disinformation, disputing the truth.

The only thing in dispute is the truth, which the left, FBI, DOJ, Biden Inc and their cohorts have been disputing.

Grow a brain. Troll.

#19

Debates: 0

Posts: 6,115

3

6

02.11.2023 02:42AM

3

6

02.11.2023 02:42AM

-->

@Double_R

Why are you here? What is your point on this site?

You know, TWS is a big Star Trek fan. That's an indication of his maturity level.

#20

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.11.2023 04:51AM

3

2

4

02.11.2023 04:51AM

-->

@TWS1405_2

When it’s ALL OVER THE INTERNET & MSM, yeah, it meets the definition of widely know AND easily verifiable.

You've conflated widely available with widely known.

And of course, just because something is widely available does not necessarily make it easily verifiable.

No, not really. The only ones disputing anything is the left. The fbi. The democrats. All those who would be ostracized for their illicit activities. Which is precisely why the FBI and democrats (like Schiff) kept espousing Russian disinformation, disputing the truth.

The only thing in dispute is the truth, which the left, FBI, DOJ, Biden Inc and their cohorts have been disputing.

So it sounds like it is in fact in dispute by more than half of your country. I don't know why you're trying to so hard. You're the one who brought out this definition.

No single person or group is the sole arbiter of truth. If you wish to make a persuasive argument as to what is the truth in this matter, that's up to you. Though at that point, we would've gone full circle.

Topic's author

#21

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 07:52PM

3

7

02.11.2023 07:52PM

-->

@dustryder

You've conflated widely available with widely known.

Nope.

Just because you’re not a part of the self-educated widely knowledgeable ones doesn’t negate the fact that it is widely available and easily verifiable.

So it sounds like it is in fact in dispute by more than half of your country.

Conservatives and educated folk outnumber the leftist idiocracy. We just don’t get all militant and destructive like they do. Forcing tolerance while being intolerant themselves. Remarkably gullible and willingly walking up to the cart to buy the snake oily democrats sell them on a daily basis.

#22

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.11.2023 08:13PM

3

2

4

02.11.2023 08:13PM

-->

@TWS1405_2

Nope.

Just because you’re not a part of the self-educated widely knowledgeable ones doesn’t negate the fact that it is widely available and easily verifiable.

Exactly. Widely available, not widely known. QED your claims demand evidence.

Conservatives and educated folk outnumber the leftist idiocracy. We just don’t get all militant and destructive like they do. Forcing tolerance while being intolerant themselves. Remarkably gullible and willingly walking up to the cart to buy the snake oily democrats sell them on a daily basis.

What an interesting tangent. The points you've made are still in dispute. QED your claims demand evidence.

Topic's author

#23

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7

02.11.2023 11:26PM

3

7

02.11.2023 11:26PM

-->

@dustryder

Not my fault or problem you lack the readily available and widely known knowledge that I and others possess whereas you do not.

If we say it’s common knowledge, it is more so than not. You fall in the not since you don’t even live here.

#24

Debates: 5

Posts: 1,080

3

2

4

02.12.2023 02:02AM

3

2

4

02.12.2023 02:02AM

-->

@TWS1405_2

Your claims which are asserted without evidence are equally dismissed without evidence. Both your original statements, and the claim that the original statements are common knowledge.

Should you actually want to reach an audience that will hear you, you need to bring that evidence, otherwise you are just speaking to an echo chamber.

Topic's author

#25

Debates: 4

Posts: 2,186

3

7