-->
@TheUnderdog
I as a white person have some comfort knowing my race is the majority in America, so waging a race war against the majority is funny to me. If my race was 3% of the population, I would be more scared.
I would be much more concerned than you are. You presume that races are well defined categories. A complete integration of historical examples shows that collectivism allows for the creation, destruction, and alteration of arbitrary categories.
At any time you could be defined as a problem minority, it need have nothing to do with an immutable characteristic. This may sound like non-sense to the uninformed but the last decade has proven the more abstract analysis correct over more recent trends.
What is blackness? What is whiteness? Ask the race socialists, they don't care about the reflectivity of your skin pigment. No more than nazis really cared if you had blue eyes and blonde hair. They pile all their ideas of good and evil into a system of classification to define people as good and evil, sacred vs irredeemable.
If my race was 3% if the population, I would vote for whichever party treated my race the best (and democrats treat black people better than republicans with policies like Affirmative action). But since my race is very common in America, I have less insecurity about it.
That is flawed in multiple contexts. First: morally, morality has nothing to do with race. Voting personal interest for any reason may or may not manifest in evil actions and by that alone it is a morally unsound method of choosing.
Securing objective rights is the only justification for violence, government is institutionalized violence, thus the only justification for government is (as the word implies) securing justice.
A voter's purpose is therefore not to seek benefits, reduce risks, or even aim towards practical investment. It is first and foremost to choose the leaders and the options which prevent injustice and rejecting leaders and options that increase injustice.
Second from a game theory perspective, 3% is by definition a small minority. The more realistic 20% is still a minority. The reservoir of white guilt is not infinite and at the current rate it will run dry in less than two generations. One must at least attempt to appeal to a motivation which is shared by a majority. If the game is simply reduced to the arbitrary and mutually exclusive interests of a majority and minority, the minority loses in all cases.
Finally, affirmative action has predictably crippled it's so called beneficiaries over the long term. It was applied to K-12 and now democrat run city schools are producing classes where no one can do math. It has been applied to colleges and more rapidly than most thought possible a college diploma is becoming kindling (a lot like the dollar bill).
I said "predictably" and it was very predictable because the idea that success or failure is primarily determined by shallow indicators is the mindset of a conman. You might not be able to get a job without wearing a suit, but only a conman thinks he can retain a job with only a suit.
It was not opportunity that "blacks" (inner city poor) lacked, it was productivity; and they were growing stronger for a long time before democrats destroyed generation after generation. They destroyed the family by subsidizing single parenthood. They destroyed education by catering to the lowest common denominator and allowing kids who despise achievement to set the youth culture. They destroyed virtue by deemphasizing the individual in every context.
Under such tender ministrations the most civilized and educated population in the world would become scattered gangs of thugs in three generations.
