Blacks and Hispanics are rather useless when it comes to invention

Author: Kaitlyn

Posts

Total: 36
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
Whites and Asians seem to be far and away the best inventors, at least when it comes to America. As of 2016, 96.5% of US inventors were either White or Asian. What's more impressive is that both races outperformed their per capita percentage, with Whites (being 61.6% of the population in 2020) representing 73.64% of inventors, while Asians (being 6% of the population in 2020) representing 21.89% of inventors. It should be noted that some percentage of both figures are Jewish people (who, imo, are functionally not White), but neither the study nor Wikipedia census data accounted for that Race and ethnicity in the United States - Wikipedia 

Conversely, despite being 12.1% of the United States population in 2020, Blacks were inventors 1.635% of the time. Hispanic/Latino people made up 18.7% of the United States population in 2020, yet they were inventors only 3.692% of the time FtPVig9WcAAwVTw (738×357) (twimg.com) . This makes my face frown.

For all the talk about Asians not being very creative, it appears when you put them in countries not stifled by odious amounts of totalitarianism (i.e. a lot of their own countries), they tend to start shining with inventions. 

For all the other talk about people "Whitewashing" history or current days by excluding Black inventions: they're just not inventing very much. They're thoroughly underrepresented because they're just not inventing very much. There's a similar but slightly better story for Hispanics.

So the next time you see an invention in the United States, you can bet your top dollar that a White or Asian person was the inventor.


Other interesting notes from the paper that aren't relevant to the OP (but still interesting):

Women represent a bit under 12% of inventors, with young women only closing this gap with relative young men to about 16% (young inventor defined as age < 36).

Over 30% of inventors are foreign born, and of that over 30%, 40% of them come from either China or India.

Inventors mostly work at larger, older firms, rather than fresh start ups, although the inventions from younger firms tended to be more impactful.

Inventors tend to be closer to middle age than young age, despite the decrease in neuroplasticity.

Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
Stereotypical feedback. Asians and white people seem smarter because they "were", they get hired in a larger extent, improving their average compared to hispanics and black people.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Human beings developed different capabilities because they adapted to different environments and contexts.

So, you can find creative people in all races, but asians would outperform the other races on this matter, I don't know why. There are other situations in which asians would be outperformed, though, like in sports.

Black people, for example, are physically outstanding. No wonder they thrive in almost all the sports, like athletics, martial arts, boxing, basketball, soccer, etc. They are also sexually superior which allow them to be ubiquitious in the porn industry.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Intelligence_06
Stereotypical feedback. Asians and white people seem smarter because they "were", they get hired in a larger extent, improving their average compared to hispanics and black people.
In the United States, Asian and White people are smarter than Black and Hispanic people. We know this through the intelligence proxy of IQ R.3c8328e3e0f52a432aff4c41166569f1 (722×578) (bing.com) 
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Human beings developed different capabilities because they adapted to different environments and contexts.
Yes.

So, you can find creative people in all races, but asians would outperform the other races on this matter, I don't know why. There are other situations in which asians would be outperformed, though, like in sports.

Black people, for example, are physically outstanding. No wonder they thrive in almost all the sports, like athletics, martial arts, boxing, basketball, soccer, etc.
There doesn't appear to be a whole lot of data on this (it would be nice if you cited your claims, too), but this appears to be the case (for the most part). 

Black people certainly over-represent long-distance running and American basketball (I'd guess that's a function of genetics, with a feedback loop created through culture). Funny how shitlibs don't consider that racial discrimination against the other races.

They are also sexually superior which allow them to be ubiquitious in the porn industry.
Do you have any data for this? How have you classified "sexually superior?"
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Kaitlyn
Do you have any data for this? How have you classified "sexually superior?"
Well, the penis size is the best indicator for sexual superiority. If you see all the statistcs about that shown in a map, you'll see that the color representing the biggest size are painted in most part of Africa, and also in Central and South America where blacks migrated as slaves.

Also, blacks have more sexual stamina. I mean if blacks are the best in sports, why not consider them the best in the bed.

There are papers that consider this as a myth, but we have to understand that the superiority is not based on the average but on the maximums, and this is where blacks stand out.
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
Blacks are very good at destruction though...Burning, Looting and Murdering






TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IlDiavolo
 I mean if blacks are the best in sports, why not consider them the best in the bed.
False equivalency fallacy. 
Sports takes no intelligence.
It takes emotional and intellectual intelligence to be good in bed. 
Besides, women do not prefer overtly big...here's the authentic women's penis size chart.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 269
Posts: 7,581
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@IlDiavolo
I have less intelligence than asians, shorter penis than blacks, I get to be charged and hated for the crimes committed by my ancestors, and if I say that I am not guilty then I am obviously a racist defending racism.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Well, the penis size is the best indicator for sexual superiority.
How have you confirmed that this is the case?

If you see all the statistcs about that shown in a map, you'll see that the color representing the biggest size are painted in most part of Africa, and also in Central and South America where blacks migrated as slaves.
What data are you referring to? Please cite your source.

Also, blacks have more sexual stamina. I mean if blacks are the best in sports, why not consider them the best in the bed.
Where are you getting all this from? What are you citing? Are you even citing anything or just making stuff up?

but we have to understand that the superiority is not based on the average but on the maximums, and this is where blacks stand out.
Yet another unsubstantiated claim.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@TWS1405_2
False equivalency fallacy. 
Sports takes no intelligence.
It takes emotional and intellectual intelligence to be good in bed. 
Besides, women do not prefer overtly big...here's the authentic women's penis size chart.
Well, it depends on what sport we talk about. Sports that involves strategy take some sort of intelligence.

As to the size, according to the chart the ideal dick size is already big, around 7 or 8 inches. Evidently, bigger than that is unconfortable for women.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Kaitlyn
Yes, and because asian and white americans are "smarter" than hispanic and african americans, the stereotypes solidify and makes the problem harder to tackle.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Intelligence_06
Yes, and because asian and white americans are "smarter" than hispanic and african americans, the stereotypes solidify and makes the problem harder to tackle.
Isn't the stereotype just a product of reality?
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Kaitlyn
Which worsens reality. I mean, what would you do if everyone throws shades at you because you just look like a cancelled celebrity? You defend yourself. Stereotypes stem from reality but that doesn't mean it should remain in reality. We should reduce their effect on society if anything.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Kaitlyn
How have you confirmed that this is the case?
There are plenty of evidence that blacks have the biggest dick in the world, and asians the smallest. I don't need to give a source for that. Just google it.

But as to the sexual superiority, this is my hypothesis based on the preferences of today's women. According to several testimonies, women are leaned to fantasize with black guys because of their physical attributes, which includes the dick size. That's why I say they are sexually superior, which is not the same to say they have a superior sexual performance. And this is not a stereotype because blacks have been known by their physical power. Actually, William Faulkner used to say that the source of racism against blacks was this physical gift which whites envied and saw it as a threat. But who knows.

I also said that blacks have more sexual stamina, I've got to admit I was rambling. The fact that blacks are good at physical work doesnt mean they are good in bed.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Intelligence_06
Which worsens reality. I mean, what would you do if everyone throws shades at you because you just look like a cancelled celebrity? You defend yourself. Stereotypes stem from reality but that doesn't mean it should remain in reality. We should reduce their effect on society if anything.
I think people are pretty quick to realize if you're an educated Black person or something a little less socially desirable, especially if they can just glance at you and see your attire/physical presentation. It probably would took longer to realize a celebrity doppelganger isn't a celebrity.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
I'm not interested in Googling your own research for you.

You need to cite your own sources otherwise we end up having a discussion where people can just make things up and it's the other person's job to disprove them. I don't want that burden of proof reversal, thank you.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Kaitlyn


TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IlDiavolo
Well, it depends on what sport we talk about
Wrong. Sports (in any version)  doesn’t equal sexual relations between a biologism’s male and/or a biological female, you ignoramus. 

TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@Kaitlyn
@IlDiavolo
I'm not interested in Googling your own research for you.
You WILL find that MANY members here wish, desire, if not DEMAND that you do their research for THEM!!!

Doubke_R is the worst of the those violators. 

Double_R refuses to click on ANY citation you give in support of your argument. He always wants the Cliff
notes version cause he’s too lazy to review an opponents supporting sources. Fact. I speak from experience with this clown. 

Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Okay, this is a lot better and something we can work with. 

You still haven't shown specifically how Blacks have the longest penis size, but at a glance, we can see that a lot of African countries are nearer the top of this chart (and it's not too much of a stretch to assume that African countries are majority Black), so it's not an unreasonable to guess to assume that this table is showing that Blacks have the longest penises in the world.

You still should provide data/evidence for your other points noted here Blacks and Hispanics are rather useless when it comes to invention (debateart.com) and also in the rest of the thread, otherwise you don't have the data/evidence necessary to make your arguments.


Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@TWS1405_2
I'm not interested in Googling your own research for you.
You WILL find that MANY members here wish, desire, if not DEMAND that you do their research for THEM!!!
It's not only annoying but logically fallacious. I'm just not going to engage with people if they can't cite their own research, and I'll end the conversation with them pointing that fact out.

Double_R refuses to click on ANY citation you give in support of your argument. He always wants the Cliff
notes version cause he’s too lazy to review an opponents supporting sources. Fact. I speak from experience with this clown. 
I personally don't mind summarizing my sources for people. I'm happy to point directly to things, directly quote or even copy-and-paste the table I'm referencing, in order to make it crystal clear what I'm citing. 

But if they're expecting me to summarize and cite both my own AND their research, they're not going to like my response.

IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Kaitlyn
No, I don't need to provide data or evidence for any point I provide in my arguments since there is something called "logic" that allows us effectively to reach to conclusions through the basic use of inference rules. Science uses it all the time. And that's what I'm doing in this thread.

If you are unable to understand that simple reasoning it's easy to dismiss other people's arguments saying foolishly that there is no evidence. 

And finally, this is not a competition, nobody is here to win a debate (there is a debate board for that), but just to leave OPINIONS, and to me everyone's opinions matter. All the threads in the forum are full of OPINIONS if you didnt realize, and it's ok, that's what this forum is for. So, I suggest you to get used to it.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Wrong. Sports (in any version) doesn’t equal sexual relations between a biologism’s male and/or a biological female, you ignoramus. 
You stated that "sports take no intelligence", which is wrong and that's what I was addressing.


As to the equivalence I did, I already rectified it.

I also said that blacks have more sexual stamina, I've got to admit I was rambling. The fact that blacks are good at physical work doesnt mean they are good in bed.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 269
Posts: 7,581
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@IlDiavolo
 to me everyone's opinions matter
Well, surely some matter more than the others?
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
No, I don't need to provide data or evidence for any point I provide in my arguments since there is something called "logic" 
You need to provide data/evidence for the types of arguments you're making. This isn't a philosophy debate wherein providing no data is sometimes fine, because the syllogism, axioms etc. are sometimes the evidence.

You can't just say, "blacks have more sexual stamina" and "blacks are the best in sports", without demonstrating that through data/evidence, because we have no metric to compare between races, hence can't make any conclusions.

You need to provide data/evidence for your arguments, elsewise they are a bunch of bare assertions.

the basic use of inference rules. Science uses it all the time
Yeah and guess what "science" uses inference rules with? Data ("all the time").

And finally, this is not a competition, nobody is here to win a debate (there is a debate board for that), but just to leave OPINIONS
If your opinions are just a bunch of unsupported bare assertions, then they don't matter.

Sorry, but make better arguments or don't bother.

IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Yeah and guess what "science" uses inference rules with? Data ("all the time").
You might be thinking that scientists only draw conclusions from lab experiments. That's wrong. We can infer certain things based only on simple observations, like when Newton witnessed an apple falling to the ground, he elaborated his gravitational theory from that simple fact.

In the same way, people have long OBSERVED that blacks dominate certain sports because of some physical traits they have. And we were not wrong about that because there is indeed a biological difference that makes blacks better than their white counterparts in sports that involve speed.


If your opinions are just a bunch of unsupported bare assertions, then they don't matter.

Sorry, but make better arguments or don't bother.
No, ma'am, I already told you, my assertions are based on thoughtful observations.

What I see, though, is that you are making the same mistake as in DDO, you're using argument traps. This is not honest at all.



IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,233
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Best.Korea
Well, surely some matter more than the others?
I mean from a collective perpective. I can deem your opinion as rubbish, but for others it might be valuable.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 269
Posts: 7,581
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@IlDiavolo
Cool
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Yeah and guess what "science" uses inference rules with? Data ("all the time").
You might be thinking that scientists only draw conclusions from lab experiments. That's wrong. We can infer certain things based only on simple observations, like when Newton witnessed an apple falling to the ground, he elaborated his gravitational theory from that simple fact.
Inferences don't control for all variables, hence relying purely on inferences is unreliable.

That's why we have controlled experiments which allows us to control for as many variables as possible, so that these variables don't interfere with the results.

Observations can spark you to test something, but they should never be the conclusion. Maybe you should have some more "thoughtful observations" about your thoughtful observations. 

In the same way, people have long OBSERVED that blacks dominate certain sports because of some physical traits they have. And we were not wrong about that because there is indeed a biological difference that makes blacks better than their white counterparts in sports that involve speed.

Why can't you stop wasting everyone's time trying to suggest observations are sufficient for understanding, when you're going to post studies like this anyway? It's just baffling.

Anyway, the study doesn't actually agree with you (which is a bit funny), "The researchers believe that these differences are not racial, but rather biological". Funnier still is that I don't actually agree with the study on this point (since Western African genes appear to produce more people with a higher center of gravity and longer limbs with smaller circumferences, it appears that the higher center of gravity is somewhat phenotypic), and thus I agree with you.

If your opinions are just a bunch of unsupported bare assertions, then they don't matter.

Sorry, but make better arguments or don't bother.
No, ma'am, I already told you, my assertions are based on thoughtful observations.

What I see, though, is that you are making the same mistake as in DDO, you're using argument traps. This is not honest at all.
Lol.

So, me asking for studies/data for the points you make is an "argument trap". We should just believe whatever you think you observe.

Peak comedy.

Anyway, I'm happy to see studies for the other claims you've made, whenever you want to post them.