let's mass debate to see who's the best master baiter

Author: n8nrgim

Posts

Total: 26
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 953
3
2
4
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
4
what say ye? 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@n8nrgim
I've cum already.
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
It is rational madman and you guys chased him off the site. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 261
Posts: 7,327
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I cant mass debate. My brain has limited debating power. I get tired just from one long debate.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
You youngsters sould should be able to mass debate at least ten times a day.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 261
Posts: 7,327
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
I dont feel so young anymore.
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 953
3
2
4
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
4
so far i see no one talking about baiting a hook, and no one unzipping their pants. this thread isn't isn't goin anywhere on point. 
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@n8nrgim
*unzips pants*

Happy?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
In the U.K.

Pants is pants

And trousers is trousers.

We tend to avoid zips in pants for technical reasons.

Previously, men wore pants and women wore something more fascinating.

Though these days all the mystery has gone.

Equality and neutrality and all that stuff.

Theypants as it is.

I've seen pictures of Miley Cyrus wearing her dad's old pants.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
You obviously feel your age then?
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
In the U.K.

Pants is pants

And trousers is trousers.
Yes, but most people on this website are American.

I'm pretty sure the U.K. is the only place in the world to have a different meaning for the word "pants".
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Dr.Franklin
@Kaitlyn
Yep, derived from the Frenck/Italian pantaloon/pantalone..

Which were sort of both underpants and trousers.

Trousers/Trews is a Scottish Irish Gaelic thing.

So I expect that the Doc wears trousers.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Yep, derived from the Frenck/Italian pantaloon/pantalone..
I didn't know that lol.

Which were sort of both underpants and trousers.
Society has definitely moved past that lol. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Yep, clothes and the development of.

Logically developed for comfort and protection.

Illogically considered in regard to the bizarre human concept of indecency, relative to our crazy ongoing body conscious hang ups.

What it is to be human I suppose.


Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Illogically considered in regard to the bizarre human concept of indecency, relative to our crazy ongoing body conscious hang ups.
I'll take a page out of the Quran and say that the more you cover people up, the more people have to judge each other based on how they act and think, rather than their physical attractiveness.

That isn't even to mention the pure distraction naked people would be to a civilization. For example, there are some guys who attend women's rallies (particularly the bra-burning or slutwalk ones) just so see women's breasts. Imagine how little they would get done if women were naked all the time.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,562
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@zedvictor4
yep
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Top of the morning Doc.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 261
Posts: 7,327
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Kaitlyn
For example, there are some guys who attend women's rallies (particularly the bra-burning or slutwalk ones) just so see women's breasts.
Yes. Breasts are good to look at.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 261
Posts: 7,327
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Although, in the era of porn and all sort of nonsense, not really sure if seeing breasts alone is good enough.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Does any other species behave in the same way to an unclothed body.

For sure, naked people have become a distraction, but only  because we have been brainwashed into thinking that they are a distraction.

Such is one drawback of overthink I suppose.

And also the drawback of elaborately overthought recreational sex.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Does any other species behave in the same way to an unclothed body.
Not that I'm aware of, but no other species is advanced as humans, either.

If everyone is too distracted with sex and the thought of it, no work will get done.

For sure, naked people have become a distraction, but only  because we have been brainwashed into thinking that they are a distraction.
Sexual drives are innate. You could put a man/woman in complete isolation and they'd still want to do it. This is basic human biology.

Such is one drawback of overthink I suppose.

And also the drawback of elaborately overthought recreational sex.
I don't agree with any of your take at all.

There's a real cost to sex to the individual, be it emotional/physical. Recreational sex is a product of women's sexual liberation. It's not natural and civilizations weren't built off it, so there's a cost to civilizations, too. 

I'm probably not highlighting how severely dangerous your idea is; degeneracy erodes civilizations until there is nothing but debauchery. 

Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
For example, there are some guys who attend women's rallies (particularly the bra-burning or slutwalk ones) just so see women's breasts.
Yes. Breasts are good to look at.
I'm curious: when you do look at them, does that happen automatically and you feel tingles? Or does something else occur?

Although, in the era of porn and all sort of nonsense, not really sure if seeing breasts alone is good enough.
Desensitization is a real thing. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 261
Posts: 7,327
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Kaitlyn
I'm curious: when you do look at them, does that happen automatically and you feel tingles? Or does something else occur?
If a man is straight, he gets tingles, excitment and desire to get some action.

Its not just "breasts = good", but its more like "see breasts = observe other parts of body and imagine lots of sexual activities with that girl".

However, I have to add that man isnt pleased by sex alone. In fact, after his orgasm, man loses most of his desire, and doesnt get same feelings when looking at breasts until his desire becomes stronger again. 

Man is happier before orgasm than after. Silly things, really.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,203
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Actually I think that we do agree.

It's just that you are caught in the moment, and assess such issues from the perspective of the modern human.

Whereas I like to make comparative assessments between the base human and it's modern derivatives.

"Basic human biology" and the overthought approach to basic human biology, as it were.

Recreational sex....You were basically saying what I was saying.

But how do we define natural?

What isn't natural?

Surely everything that occurs within the universe is of a natural cause.
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
I'm curious: when you do look at them, does that happen automatically and you feel tingles? Or does something else occur?
If a man is straight, he gets tingles, excitment and desire to get some action.

Its not just "breasts = good", but its more like "see breasts = observe other parts of body and imagine lots of sexual activities with that girl".

However, I have to add that man isnt pleased by sex alone. In fact, after his orgasm, man loses most of his desire, and doesnt get same feelings when looking at breasts until his desire becomes stronger again. 

Man is happier before orgasm than after. Silly things, really.
Alright.

Thanks for explaining it to me.

PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
I don't wear no damn pants or trousers. I am from the south. I wear Britches