A measure sponsored by a woman who worked at a strip club passed Congress today

Author: IwantRooseveltagain

Posts

Total: 75
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,255
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Greyparrot

No, the RNC.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,299
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
Cool. More stories and fantasy porn.

Cause the facts are just so flaccid lately, aren't they?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@DavidAZ
why not a stroke victim who can hardly talk straight?
Trump can hardly talk straight, but he didn’t have a stroke, he’s just an idiot.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@cristo71
If and when you are given that, you will do what, exactly?
Apply critical thinking skills. Do you know what that is?

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
I'm guessing you got that off of Wikipedia? 
Or, or, it was on national television every day for a month.

What a dummy substitute teacher
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,299
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
There was nothing about drugging and stealing in the Wikipedia write up. I have to assume you’re lying until you can cite a credible source, genius.

Apply critical thinking skills. Do you know what that is?

What a dummy...

Did you know relying on Wikipedia isn't critical thinking?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Did you know relying on Wikipedia isn't critical thinking?
Wikipedia is an excellent source. The resource is nonpartisan, it is overseen by an editorial board, and requires citations from credible sources or it is deleted.

You, on the other hand, use Jimmy Dore! Lol. What a loser!

The critical thinking comes after reading a source like Wikipedia you dummy.

A person evaluates the source for original sources, credibility, expertise, valid credentials, bias, and overall common sense. Get it? You dummy

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,299
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Wikipedia is an excellent source.
Did you know our district won't allow us to let our students rely on Wikipedia as a credible source? 

Even the founder says it's unreliable.

I know school has changed a lot since the days of the popular Fascism of the 60's, but you should know your son isn't permitted to cite Wikipedia as a source.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,137
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Apply critical thinking skills. Do you know what that is?
Yes, it’s just that your skills involve more criticism than thinking. In any case, I’m sure you really mean that you will dodge the point when faced with it head on.

cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,137
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
“in the Wikipedia write up”

lol
He is a crack up, isn’t he? In the completely unintentional kind of way…


IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Did you know our district won't allow us to let our students rely on Wikipedia as a credible source? 
You idiot, you would use the original source cited in Wikipedia. So to clarify, you idiot, Wikipedia is an excellent source to find sources.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Even the founder says it's unreliable.

That’s a lie, he said it doesn’t always tell the truth. So, how often? One out of a thousand? One out of a million? So you ask, how often is Wikipedia inaccurate?
How often would it have to be wrong to be considered unreliable by a reasonable person? 

He said it (Wikipedia) “seems to assume that there is only one legitimate defensible version of the truth on any controversial question. That’s not how Wikipedia used to be.”

Sanger appears to be a bald, conservative wack job. 


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,299
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
I know I shouldn't, but sometimes I imagine Roose subbing for me for a week and reading all the administrative complaints 5 days later. It's pretty funny to imagine the chaos.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Even the founder (Larry Sanger) says it's unreliable.
OMG, even that is a lie. At best he was a cofounder. At worst he is a disgruntled former employee who worked there for a few years before he was laid off.

Everything you say is a lie. You are pathetic and incompetent and that is why you are merely a substitute teacher.


“While studying at college, Sanger developed an interest in using the Internet for educational purposes and joined the online encyclopedia Nupedia as editor-in-chief in 2000. Disappointed with the slow progress of Nupedia, Sanger proposed using a wikito solicit and receive articles to put through Nupedia's peer-review process; this change led to the development and launch of Wikipedia in 2001. Sanger served as Wikipedia's community leader and was the only editorial employee of Wikipedia in its early stages but was laid off and left the project in 2002. Sanger's status as a co-founder of Wikipedia has been questioned by fellow co-founder Jimmy Wales but is generally accepted.“

After he was laid off at Wikipedia, Sanger started his own version to compete with Wikipedia but it has not caught on. 
Great job exercising critical thinking skills SubTeach
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,304
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
I know I shouldn't, but sometimes I imagine Roose subbing for me for a week and reading all the administrative complaints 5 days later. It's pretty funny to imagine the chaos.
Lol, you are the substitute teacher. You are too dumb and spend too much time here to be a full time teacher.

Every day you come on here and get the facts wrong just like you did today with Larry Sanger. You are a dummy.