Hollywood Ca upset people watch a man saving exploited kids over another girlboss movie.

The movie "Sound of Freedom" is making waves in Hollywood and the mainstream media. Despite its small budget of $14 million and limited promotion, it has achieved remarkable success at the box office. It even outperformed "Indiana Jones" and is competing well against a massive-budget Disney movie on a per-theater basis. However, some in the woke media are having a meltdown over the movie's message about child trafficking prevention, branding it as "Q-Anon adjacent" and trashing it in liberal outlets.

The movie is based on a true story about child trafficking, and its success challenges the notion that addressing human trafficking is a political message. It portrays the work of Tim Ballard and his organization, Operation Underground Railroad, which rescues children from slavery and trafficking rings. The movie has received criticism from certain far left whack media outlets, such as The Guardian and Jezebel, who are quick to dismiss it as a conspiracy or a paranoid thriller.

Critics of the movie fail to acknowledge that it is based on real-life events and highlights a serious issue. The movie's core story is based on the work of an actual charitable organization dedicated to combating child trafficking. Despite attempts to politicize it, the movie's aim is not political; it focuses on raising awareness about a real pressing problem.

The backlash against "Sound of Freedom" reveals a double standard in the media. Woke Outlets like Rolling Stone and The Washington Post praised controversial films like "Cuties," which faced accusations of sexualizing young girls. However, they are quick to attack a movie that addresses human trafficking and child slavery, undermining its importance.

Despite these crazed partisan attacks, "Sound of Freedom" continues to resonate with audiences and exceed expectations at the box office. Its success should raise eyebrows in Hollywood. The media's fierce opposition is a response to this movie's impact. Despite attempts to discredit it, the movie's powerful message and real-world relevance make it a compelling watch over the trite woke crap.

What does the FBI think about this movie? Is it an insurrection type movie?

I dont usually watch movies.

They take too much time and most of them have the same plot:

1. Introduce good

2. Introduce bad

3. Be sad about the lost good

4. Gradually progress in removing bad

5. Be happy that the bad was removed.

6. The end.

🥱 

Crazed partisan attacks is more QAnon's gig than Hollywood.  I don't see anything to suggest that Hollywood is paying much attention to this movie, given that the 4chan and plural wives set ain't really Hollywood's target demographic.

I think the FBI would say the same thing as the CIA and DHS- we can't verify his claims.  We know for sure that Ballard has taken full credit for some child rescues in which he has played no part and patently lied about.  We know he claims to have worked for us and with us but we can't verifiy any of that, either.

This is the third movie Ballard has produced about this incident and what a great guy Ballard is.   Ballard himself admits that the latest movie takes a lot of liberties- no he didn't really pose as a doctor and strike out into the Columbian jungle to rescue any girl, no he did not kill Columbian rebels in hand-to-hand combat as the movie portrays.  Yes, he watched the Columbian police rescue some kids in Bogata and then made three movies giving himself increasingly larger credit for the event. 

I think most critics worry about the lies and lack of open accounting in an ostensibly charitible organization.  I think most critics wonder why  the Trump Administration and police departments terminated thier relationships with Ballard suddenly without explanation.  I think most most critics wonder how much good could have been done if only Ballard spent those tens of milliona of dollars  he raised on exploited children rather than promoting himself as some kind of action hero christian

See oromagi's response.

Is that an order from the FBI?

😊   

All I can say is oromagi's first name is Christopher A.

😊   

Something interesting is that Disney purchased the rights for this movie with the sole purpose of censoring it. After Disney lost the rights, it was finally published against the wishes of Hollywood.

Why would Disney censor a film about protecting kids?