@Topic, no post in particular.
Moral culpability matters more as functional culpability of value,
Maybe.
People make errors in relation to their abilities,
Sometimes errors occur of gross negligence,
That is to say a lack of thought or capability practiced.
If one values the error not occur, and it is within their ability,
They will feel culpability,
Though even in matters related to us, we see steep inclines, we do not expect to overcome.
. . .
A person working in a hospital, knows of the 6 Rights,
- Identify the right patient. ...
- Verify the right medication. ...
- Verify the indication for use. ...
- Calculate the right dose. ...
- Make sure it's the right time. ...
- Check the right route.
People make errors, more or less depending on their nature, nurture, and circumstance.
But it is not something to be passively accepted,
Effort is expected to be made, that said person is up to the standards expected of their position.
. . .
Why is effort expected?
Because of past experiences and value,
If one values not making mistakes,
Values patient care,
Values other's appraisals,
They will effort to not make mistakes,
They will effort because in the past, effort has shown to change oneself, to make mistakes less likely,
To practice awareness, consciousnesses.
. . . .
Of some people, their past experiences show unlikelihood of effort changing them,
Culpability is also expectation,
As well as relation.
. . .
An incapable, unable to improve person, may be related to a circumstance,
Still they might feel culpable,
For experience does not always show what is 'possible.
Nor does incapability exclude 'desire.
. . .
Maybe.
