This fucking site.

This forum is simply over reacting to "cunt." There is no reason to get so annoyed at moderation here for seeing no wrong in the post.

If the post said. "Your a fucking cunt face shit mcgee," then you can say it's bannable, but one word alone will never be enough to ban someone beside words like the n-word or a homophobic term

No one will ever be happy with a bunch of hard headed people on one site

Want me to give case study examples or actually you don't get what I mean?

The only official policy is the written CoC, which says your job is to enforce the rules.

They did see wrong in the post. You aren't paying attention. It's kept here not because it was fine but as "evidence" because bsh1 now imagines him as being in an episode of CSI or some shit.

I'm not talking about banning anyone. Again, you're not paying attention.

It was a personal attack against a user with no other content whatsoever. It is a violate of the CoC with no mitigating factors. Unequivocally. It should be deleted.

This is a separate issue from banning anyone.

??? Can you elaborate this part???

A personal attack is saying something more in depth like, "Your a fucking fat whale shithead." That is more of a direct attack than calling someone a cunt because it is A) One word, B) vaguely describing someone. If I called someone an asshole or just said "Bitch.", it is not a direct threat

Then what are you suggesting? what other mod action are you wanting to take for this

]Well, it seems to be moderation that is blamed for people not being happy. 

It's kept here not because it was fine but as "evidence" because bsh1 now imagines him as being in an episode of CSI or some shit.

I don't believe I ever said that. I don't delete posts because I am not in the business of censoring people, because it has been indicated to me that that was not what the community desired, and because the poster was punished--there doesn't seem to be much to gain from deleting the post. It's not causing anymore harm just sitting there than it did when Castin read it, unlike a post which doxxes or includes a link to a pornographic website, for example.

Humans will blame other people for something that is their fault when it is their fault in the first place

Historic examples are the Jews to the Germans, 1800s blacks to the Americans, and in Chicago, Irish to the rest of the population

To a mild degree, he has a point. When someone big wants a leniency in modding, the community slowly trends to favor the leaning or whatever side the popular is on

I don't believe I ever said that. I don't delete posts because I am not in the business of censoring people,

because it has been indicated to me that that was not what the community desired,

and because the poster was punished--there doesn't seem to be much to gain from deleting the post.

It's not causing anymore harm just sitting there than it did when Castin read it, unlike a post which doxxes or includes a link to a pornographic website, for example.

??? Can you elaborate this part???

Dude. Actually read the thread. The argument isn't that the post is fine, it's that it's being kept as "evidence."

A personal attack is saying something more in depth like, "Your a fucking fat whale shithead." That is more of a direct attack than calling someone a cunt because it is A) One word, B) vaguely describing someone. If I called someone an asshole or just said "Bitch.", it is not a direct threat

There is no minimum word requirement here.

Then what are you suggesting? what other mod action are you wanting to take for this

DELETE THE POST

I am sorry but what the fuck. In the 1st page you literally said nothing. I could not find anything anywhere expect now that says "EVIDENCE"

Calling someone a "cunt" versus calling someone a "fuckface dumbass fat retard" has a difference 

LINK ME TO THE POST WHERE YOU SAID THAT BC U DID NOT SAY THAT NOR APPLY IT EITHER(caps for more attention

So I should rule by fiat and eliminate any deliberative-style process, like MEEP or even a majority-vote discussion? Good to know.

Its status as violating the rules remains unchanged. If such posts are harmless, then they shouldn't be against the CoC.

You should enforce the CoC. Period. if you don't want to do that because it upsets people. Step down.

Yes. They are different. But they are still both directed attacks.

The only official policy is the written CoC, which says your job is to enforce the rules.

So I should rule by fiat and eliminate any deliberative-style process, like MEEP or even a majority-vote discussion? Good to know.

Seems like you missed the point again. I'll repeat: "It's not causing any more harm just sitting there than it did when Castin read it, unlike a post which doxxes or includes a link to a pornographic website, for example." There is certainly an initial harm in the post being created; there does not seem to be an ongoing harm in leaving the post up.