How so? My second sections is literally all facts and none of my opinion. It would be difficult to argue that it is good when the net suicide is the highest in any modern societal group.
Unnecessary means that their goal of " working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise" is unnecessary as it has already been achieved and that black lives are systemically targeted.
Just to make my contention crystal clear to both my opponent and viewers, I believe that systemic racism is not real and does not impact black individuals.
Ignore the last section where I say "Why does anger constitute to a viable argument?". I copy and pasted some sections from previous debates I've had on DDO. My last opponent seemed to believe that anger makes a good case for an argument.
Also what do you mean when you say that I do not give evidence? I cited the exact same source as you and provided detailed numbers provided by the FBI.
That is the exact same statistics that I use. Notice that in America, black people constitute thirteen point four percent of the population. According to the source you have, black individuals commit fifty-three-point one percent of murder, fifty-four-point three percent of robbery and forty-three point nine percent of illegal weapon possession. Remember, they consist of less than an eighth of the American population. Sure, white people commit more overall crime because they constitute for such a large number of the population, but it is more likely for an individual to be shot while robbing a mall, then being shot for vandalising a car park.
I will repeat, black people commit more than half of Americas homicide, more than half of Americas robbery and 43 percent of weapon possession.
I am arguing purely against their belief that black lives are systemically targeted in todays society. According to the official blacklivesmatter website, they believe that,
"We are working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise"
and that they believe all black people, including,
"Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, undocumented folks, folks with records, women, and all Black lives along the gender spectrum"
To be honest, I've never seen a BLM protestor holding a sign saying "healthcare for all" they've all been "black lives matter, we don't want to be oppressed"
You state that "There are still biases against blacks in the nation". How so? Can you give me an example. Remember, I believe that racism is real, how can it not be? There is racism against black people, Asians and white people. But BLM fights against supposed "systemic racism" and "police brutality". My case is that, from the cases given by the left wing media, police are not brutal and there is no systemic racism. To say that there is systemic racism is to say the the system is racist, meaning that there must be some part of police training which endorsees racism.
My stance is that it is not necessary as their is no systemic racism, no sentencing bias or any need for a criminal justice reform. It is not necessary as black people are not targeted by the police.
Take a moment to think about the lefties twist the media. Remember Breonna Taylor? According to the left, She was asleep. Wrong. According to the left, The boyfriend did not fire. Wrong. According to the left, The police did not knock. Wrong. According to the left, The police were legally obligated to knock. Wrong. According to the left, the officers went to the wrong house. Wrong.
Why would the media need to twist these stories if there was real racism at work? The reason they manipulate the story is because there is no case study which supports what they are saying.
I proved that left wing media lies and twists stories into their narratives. I also provided FBI statistics to support my belief that black people ARE NOT disproportionately targeted.
To say that a movement is necessary is to say that black people are targeted by a systemically racist police force. I will wait for con to give me their idea of this and then rebut it.
Fair enough, I'm sure I'll have a valid response if need be.
Who's Zaroette and Ore_Ele?
*thank
Thanks you. I would never send out an argument with such unsatisfying typos.
How so? My second sections is literally all facts and none of my opinion. It would be difficult to argue that it is good when the net suicide is the highest in any modern societal group.
Why do my words just randomly connect bruh. Like my copy and pasted quotes just magnetise together.
I've got enough debates on my plate, maybe another time!
I’m just challenging the top 20 to raise the stakes for myself . Should be interesting
Thanks!
Thanks for a great debate, and may the more logically coherent win!
Yeah, I doubt that.
By all means, challenge me to a debate with the same title and a 20 000 character limit and we’ll see who’s calling who ignorant.
So that would be because of the single parent rate, not because of some sort of sociatal racism
Playing the identity politics game I see. Just because I am not black does not mean I do not know about their lies.
Unnecessary means that their goal of " working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise" is unnecessary as it has already been achieved and that black lives are systemically targeted.
Just to make my contention crystal clear to both my opponent and viewers, I believe that systemic racism is not real and does not impact black individuals.
My DDO username is c.tsangas05
Thanks
Ignore the last section where I say "Why does anger constitute to a viable argument?". I copy and pasted some sections from previous debates I've had on DDO. My last opponent seemed to believe that anger makes a good case for an argument.
I don't get how this is cheating
Also what do you mean when you say that I do not give evidence? I cited the exact same source as you and provided detailed numbers provided by the FBI.
That is the exact same statistics that I use. Notice that in America, black people constitute thirteen point four percent of the population. According to the source you have, black individuals commit fifty-three-point one percent of murder, fifty-four-point three percent of robbery and forty-three point nine percent of illegal weapon possession. Remember, they consist of less than an eighth of the American population. Sure, white people commit more overall crime because they constitute for such a large number of the population, but it is more likely for an individual to be shot while robbing a mall, then being shot for vandalising a car park.
I will repeat, black people commit more than half of Americas homicide, more than half of Americas robbery and 43 percent of weapon possession.
Have you actually read my debate?
I am arguing purely against their belief that black lives are systemically targeted in todays society. According to the official blacklivesmatter website, they believe that,
"We are working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise"
and that they believe all black people, including,
"Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, undocumented folks, folks with records, women, and all Black lives along the gender spectrum"
To be honest, I've never seen a BLM protestor holding a sign saying "healthcare for all" they've all been "black lives matter, we don't want to be oppressed"
You state that "There are still biases against blacks in the nation". How so? Can you give me an example. Remember, I believe that racism is real, how can it not be? There is racism against black people, Asians and white people. But BLM fights against supposed "systemic racism" and "police brutality". My case is that, from the cases given by the left wing media, police are not brutal and there is no systemic racism. To say that there is systemic racism is to say the the system is racist, meaning that there must be some part of police training which endorsees racism.
My stance is that it is not necessary as their is no systemic racism, no sentencing bias or any need for a criminal justice reform. It is not necessary as black people are not targeted by the police.
Take a moment to think about the lefties twist the media. Remember Breonna Taylor? According to the left, She was asleep. Wrong. According to the left, The boyfriend did not fire. Wrong. According to the left, The police did not knock. Wrong. According to the left, The police were legally obligated to knock. Wrong. According to the left, the officers went to the wrong house. Wrong.
Why would the media need to twist these stories if there was real racism at work? The reason they manipulate the story is because there is no case study which supports what they are saying.
I proved that left wing media lies and twists stories into their narratives. I also provided FBI statistics to support my belief that black people ARE NOT disproportionately targeted.
To say that a movement is necessary is to say that black people are targeted by a systemically racist police force. I will wait for con to give me their idea of this and then rebut it.
That's exactly what I have and will do.
I'll debate you next if you want.