Total posts: 2,695
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Savant is voting you.
Another 4 piling on you is foreseeable.
I wont scumread you voting him. Trust me, vote him. We just then need a hammerer
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Please vote Savant to prevent the role leaks.
Created:
Posted in:
I am not voting anybody who does not claim except Savant.
This approach is not wise.
You are allowing Savant to get away with what he did and arming Mafia with an entire rolemap of Town.
Created:
Posted in:
If Savant ends up escaping by this, it truly is gamethrow by Town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
We cannot enforce this at all. People can have irl stuff turn up.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
He said it in signups. No fakeclaims given. I noticed it and mentioned I support it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Even if we don’t get a lynch correct in dp1 the odds of finding scum will be relatively easier to narrow down by locking them in like this the further we go
But they can block off or redirect protectives and kill the investigatives. Whereas now that is riskier.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
NO! We vote Savant or Mikal only. Please do not policy outside that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Mafia gains more than Town from this Massclaim, don't you see?
It helps them aim their secondary powers.
Created:
Posted in:
My new TRs (lower nymber is higher rank:
- Wylted
- Ultra
- Lunatic
- Pie
- Casey
Mikal is dropped from it
My scumpile now is:
2. Savant/Mikal joint 2nd
3. Whiteflame
If I had to read myself, I am townier than Lunatic imo, less so than Ultra.
Created:
Posted in:
If Savant is Town, Mikal still is suspicious for using this chance to gain a massclaim and lying abiut his past to help Savant feel okay doing what he did.
Created:
Posted in:
If Savant is Scum,
Mikal actually is his most likely partner.
The reason is the hardball amd fact Mikal added lies to help placate others against hammering Savant playing hardball.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
I would decline, this regime is a lesser evil to those 2.
Created:
Posted in:
The main reason democracy is good is because if the wrong dictatorship happens, then it is far harder to fight it.
If you set a system up where the army and all would coup an evil leader and truly believe in morality and religion to their core, that sort of dictatorship can work out.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
My role.isnonce per game. Its worded exactly as that.
It seems if I get my dreamd eneid np1 it gets a second chance np2.
Created:
Posted in:
And because referred to why I am Open to vote Mikal, brainfart.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
@WyIted
Lunatic just revealed to me that Mikal lied about his strategy working for him and because Mikal pretended to bebunsure if the game has thirdparty or scum has fakeclaims when he barely ever slips like that as Town.
I overlooked it wrongly.
I also think Mikal is the only player here who would be fully okay with Savant playing how he did.
I am open to switch to Mikal if he doesn't vote Savant soon.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
But do you hold the same fiery stance if Mikal does what Savant did?
I do.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@21Pilots
Adele edits her voice in every single song you hear. So did Bon Jovi btw.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Id do identical if Mikal did this and had also scumtold.
When you brought up Christ and Martyrdom it did become personal but it is based on solid game principles and playing to my win condition. I am not unvoting you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I said I can imagine a player not claiming as scum there.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I would also blacklist Mikal for doing it, equally.
That probably is where you and I differ.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ultracrepidarian
I already fullclaimed. Me avoiding massclaim cant be a scumtell. I would just prepare my partner as scum to fakeclaim, regardless.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
That is what I have had to do in some situations, yes. Since it ends up binary. You vote one bandwagon or another.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ultracrepidarian
Please just think of this:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
The situation is as follows:
- 3 voters 2 of which jave fullclaimed 1 of which is confirmed by the unclaimed in the 3 are voting Savant.
- You would therefore need 4 votes on someone who is not Savant, since we are united, to vote someone else off.
- If you are town and all 3 of us are Town, out of 5 remaining players you would want 4 to vote the 5th. There would be 2 scum in that 5.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Why does Savant get special treatment?
If myself or others behaved like him theyd have been hammered long ago.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Give me 1 reason for you to claim. 1.
Then do the same for others than Savant.
Remember, no matter what Wylted, Pie and myself are voting Savant unless a direct CC occurs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
That time is solely being utilised to reveal more info on our roles to mafia.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Found the unvote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@whiteflame
@Mikal
@Ultracrepidarian
The reality is the relatively clear player is voting Savant and so is the player that confirmed him.
I have full claimed.
So which 4 players exactly are you planning to vote with?
The 3 of us are not shifting.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
You voted Savant and left him to be hammered for a while. You then unvoted for no good reason as you oppose the massclaim.
The reality is the relatively clear player is voting Savant and so is the player that confirmed him.
I have full claimed.
So who which 4 players exactly are you planning to vote with?
The 3 of us are not shifting.
Created:
Posted in:
Savant playing hardball makes Mikal likelier as the partner. I feel Mikal is one of the only players whod hard support Savant playing it how he did. So if we assume Savant got permission from partner to risk it all, Mikal is by far his likeliest partner.
Created:
Posted in:
I dont know why Savant wouldnt fakeclaim as WFs partner though
Created: