May I ask that if you taken into account of what the people owning the business, or part of a business would think? They would lose vast sums of profit, and then what would happen? They would decide to try to bypass the law! Governments certainly don't want to see that do they?
The difference between medicine and drugs are that drugs hurt people while medicine help people. Here it is medicine, that doesn't hurt people like drugs do.
You are saying the LGBTQ can not be in your genes when the scientific research has proven it? If you are saying this, go conduct or find a research that said that LGBTQ can not be in your genes before we continue arguing. Without facts, your arguments are not worth to be trust and taken into account. On the other hand, my arguments are backed up with facts.
After I publish my argument(which i just did), you plubish yours, we do this for three times, then the voters will decide the winner.
May I ask that if you taken into account of what the people owning the business, or part of a business would think? They would lose vast sums of profit, and then what would happen? They would decide to try to bypass the law! Governments certainly don't want to see that do they?
I didn't see that it is only one thousand characters. This makes it impossible to make a bunch of strong arguments and support them with facts.
Agreed, even a casual debate needs like 3000 characters. I mean like the very, very, very simple ones.
Fair point, however we are talking about the medicine that is not harmful generally if you don't overuse them.
You aren't even answer the debate 20 minutes or less after you posted it
The difference between medicine and drugs are that drugs hurt people while medicine help people. Here it is medicine, that doesn't hurt people like drugs do.
By the way, maybe the voting period is a bit long
You are saying the LGBTQ can not be in your genes when the scientific research has proven it? If you are saying this, go conduct or find a research that said that LGBTQ can not be in your genes before we continue arguing. Without facts, your arguments are not worth to be trust and taken into account. On the other hand, my arguments are backed up with facts.
Why do so many people forfeit a debate
pretty sure some people aren't actually reading content but just voting based on who has more votes