R2:
Having a physical disability is not the same as a mental disorder.
There is a distinct difference between a disordered and differently ordered person.
Heterosexuality is not an objective for human survival, it is a tool for reproduction of more humans. On a planet with more than enough humans, nature just may need humans to stop producing quite as much.
You lack understanding of what objectivity and subjectivity are.
The human body has evolved the sexual organs with two main functions. Reproduction and pleasure, if a person is born not wanting either, they don't have to.
Your entire argument is "they're supposed to want to."
If it makes you feel correct to call them disorderly because they don't want to slam their meat vessel with another, then subjectively, you can do that.
And if it makes me feel correct to tell you everything in nature isn't so black and white, I can do that. You think in a linear fashion with extreme hard set rules to your logic. The psyche is not so simple.
My apologies for misreading, I was supposed to argue that circumcision is not painful, and I did the opposite. No one with a brain can argue that, so I will concede, I'm in a position that has no way to win.
Apologies for forfeiture, ran out of time due to my schedule. Interesting topic, and I believe a better argument could be made on my part if I had more time to research the topic. Good debate.
Apologies for forfeiture, had quite a busy day yesterday and couldn't find the time to respond. I believe we could get to the true issue with the overpay of athletes by broadening the issue to socioeconomic hierarchies.
I had more to say on this topic, but ran out of time. This would be a fun debate for face to face.
The issue here isn't with the athletes themselves, rather with the system they live in. This doesn't mean that they aren't overpaid, only that they are not the reason they are overpaid, they don't set the prices.
I believe that the fact we have the urge to have the discussion of whether or not chess is a sport is a qualifying factor as to why it should have its own distinguished classification that will separate games of the mind from games of the body.
For instance, imagine a device that reads simple input to the game by brainwaves. Turn based, competitive games that measure intellect, not reaction time, speed, or physical skil should have their own classification, as I believe is demonstrated by the very fact this conversation is being had.
R2:
Having a physical disability is not the same as a mental disorder.
There is a distinct difference between a disordered and differently ordered person.
Heterosexuality is not an objective for human survival, it is a tool for reproduction of more humans. On a planet with more than enough humans, nature just may need humans to stop producing quite as much.
You lack understanding of what objectivity and subjectivity are.
The human body has evolved the sexual organs with two main functions. Reproduction and pleasure, if a person is born not wanting either, they don't have to.
Your entire argument is "they're supposed to want to."
If it makes you feel correct to call them disorderly because they don't want to slam their meat vessel with another, then subjectively, you can do that.
And if it makes me feel correct to tell you everything in nature isn't so black and white, I can do that. You think in a linear fashion with extreme hard set rules to your logic. The psyche is not so simple.
R2: a priest is someone who professes the truth of that which they believe, and attempts to show others the truth of what they are saying.
Apologies for forfeiture of round one.
My apologies for misreading, I was supposed to argue that circumcision is not painful, and I did the opposite. No one with a brain can argue that, so I will concede, I'm in a position that has no way to win.
Apologies for forfeiture, have had my schedule slam full the last few days. I will address concerns of the previous round in the next.
Apologies for forfeiture, been quite busy. Good debate.
Apologies for forfeiture, ran out of time due to my schedule. Interesting topic, and I believe a better argument could be made on my part if I had more time to research the topic. Good debate.
Apologies for forfeiture, had quite a busy day yesterday and couldn't find the time to respond. I believe we could get to the true issue with the overpay of athletes by broadening the issue to socioeconomic hierarchies.
I had more to say on this topic, but ran out of time. This would be a fun debate for face to face.
The issue here isn't with the athletes themselves, rather with the system they live in. This doesn't mean that they aren't overpaid, only that they are not the reason they are overpaid, they don't set the prices.
Hulk smash brother
I believe that the fact we have the urge to have the discussion of whether or not chess is a sport is a qualifying factor as to why it should have its own distinguished classification that will separate games of the mind from games of the body.
For instance, imagine a device that reads simple input to the game by brainwaves. Turn based, competitive games that measure intellect, not reaction time, speed, or physical skil should have their own classification, as I believe is demonstrated by the very fact this conversation is being had.