My skillset has definitely always been more towards the second and third round than towards the first so hopefully things get more clear as the debate goes on
Thanks for the kind comments, and sorry for the late post. Was making sure that I put enough time into the argument, (I am against the rank 1 debater on this site after all)
CITATIONS
Camden's use of force policy: (Let me know if this link is broken I'm worried it might be)
http://camdencountypd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/USE-OF-FORCE-123121.pdf
Slight info about Camden's use of force policy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGQEtHBMP08&t=466s
Interview with Byrd and circumstances of the shooting:
https://rollcall.com/2021/08/26/officer-who-fired-fatal-shot-says-ashli-babbitt-posed-a-threat-to-house-members/
Media Bias Check on Roll Call:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/roll-call/
Footage of shooting:
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/capitol-shooting-that-led-to-ashli-babbitt-s-death-captured-on-video-99180613572
Writing my argument right now and bumping up against the word count, by "Sources may be merely linked in debate as long as citations are listed in comments", do you mean that I can just hyperlink and then post full links in the comments?
If you don't see this before I post I'll just default to posting full links in the argument itself
Is the debate meant to be about whether it's better to have a codified or and uncodified constitution, or are we meant to evaluate Britian's and the UK's constitutions holistically? Excited for the debate either way, just curious to help tailor my research.
Feel free to send a Google doc like you let me do, I'll wait the 7 days before posting anything
I am never taking a debate with a 5k wordcount again lmao
CON's R3 SOURCES:
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/proper
In addition to CON's R1 sources, and PRO's sources
Thanks for the offer, here's a link to the google doc
Formatting isn't as good as it would have been on debate art but I went through and tried to make it more readable
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19I_aEifMFOsGSF0HMKI1bl86TXhfv30pwXajqoPUWBo/edit?usp=sharing
MY WIFI CUT OUT BEFORE I COULD PUBLISH MY ARGUMENT RIPPP
CON's R2 CITATIONS
https://rollcall.com/2022/03/07/report-on-capitol-police-preparedness-for-jan-6-shows-lack-of-clarity-on-use-of-force/
Just one source for this round, everything else was building off oromagi's sources or my previous sources.
My skillset has definitely always been more towards the second and third round than towards the first so hopefully things get more clear as the debate goes on
Thanks for the kind comments, and sorry for the late post. Was making sure that I put enough time into the argument, (I am against the rank 1 debater on this site after all)
CITATIONS
Camden's use of force policy: (Let me know if this link is broken I'm worried it might be)
http://camdencountypd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/USE-OF-FORCE-123121.pdf
Slight info about Camden's use of force policy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGQEtHBMP08&t=466s
Interview with Byrd and circumstances of the shooting:
https://rollcall.com/2021/08/26/officer-who-fired-fatal-shot-says-ashli-babbitt-posed-a-threat-to-house-members/
Media Bias Check on Roll Call:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/roll-call/
Footage of shooting:
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/capitol-shooting-that-led-to-ashli-babbitt-s-death-captured-on-video-99180613572
Writing my argument right now and bumping up against the word count, by "Sources may be merely linked in debate as long as citations are listed in comments", do you mean that I can just hyperlink and then post full links in the comments?
If you don't see this before I post I'll just default to posting full links in the argument itself
Is the debate meant to be about whether it's better to have a codified or and uncodified constitution, or are we meant to evaluate Britian's and the UK's constitutions holistically? Excited for the debate either way, just curious to help tailor my research.