You aren't proving the right thing. You have to prove BLM is an unnecessary movement, meaning that the things it is fighting for are essentially non-existent.
A felony, like it is now. The problem with the resolution is that it says "most" loved one. How will this person be revived? How will they keep track of who loved them the most? Murder happens at a spectacular and terrifying rate, having everyone they ever were related to seems tedious.
Obviously you are ignoring the scope of the debate. There are 4200 religions, you have stated four. I don't really care how big the four are, you have to prove that most if not all religions are harmful
Generally is never in the description as follows. Even if you don't mean all religions, which the resolution implies, you have to prove that most religions are harmful to society, which still you have not skimmed the top of. You haven't covered any Asian religions. There are an estimated 4200 religions in the world and you have stated four.
All you've proven is a set of Western-based religions are harmful to society. You have to prove that every religion is harmful to society, not most. Your burden of proof is gigantic, and you have barely skimmed the top lol
I mean, again a religion is not a race. Hitler didn't really care about the race of the Jewish people, he just wanted them to be rid of because of his sick agenda.
Its not out of the question that he worshiped the Aryan "race" more than any other races, and seeked to destroy all the others.
Have to disagree:"a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"
Humans are not the only sentient beings in the universe, I have a source saying this. The thing about this debate is that Water can't accept what objective morality is and it is impossible to prove. Objective morality is not only directed to humans, Water can't decide this based on what animals can't interpret morals. The only thing that we were debating about was the definition, and multiple sources prove Water wrong about what he thinks is objective morality, even my source says:
"In the end, humans are one species. While many religions believe that we are the only intelligent species, and that our creator was focused on us and our actions, someone who is more secular may point to the fact that there may be other intelligent life out there. What we believe to be objectively true may not be in some other galaxy, if you believe there is intelligent life out there.
Even without the aliens, animals have different morals as well. Some animals eat their own as a part of their life cycle. Almost all of us are disgusted over the idea of cannibalism. This is a moral inconsistency found on this earth."
You proved that rioting and looting were not justified, not that BLM is not necessary.
You aren't proving the right thing. You have to prove BLM is an unnecessary movement, meaning that the things it is fighting for are essentially non-existent.
https://discord.gg/QKD9rru
New link.
Vote Bump
Laveyan Satanists are not religious. Therefore, they are atheists.
Ya can't be both at once.
neat
why'd you say "on balance"
There is a discord server for this:
https://discord.gg/QKD9rru
https://discord.gg/QKD9rru
New link.
Vote Bump
https://discord.gg/5jnXErs
Vote.
Make it unrated, and I'll accept.
Vote.
Sorry, when I said "LaVeyan Satanists are not atheist" I mean that they weren't religious or they didn't believe in a deity.
bruh
Vote
Yare yare daze.
>:( THIEF
Concession, vote.
A felony, like it is now. The problem with the resolution is that it says "most" loved one. How will this person be revived? How will they keep track of who loved them the most? Murder happens at a spectacular and terrifying rate, having everyone they ever were related to seems tedious.
Bruh
Clearly y'all haven't heard of Flocabulary.
You know its good when there is a RFD that is nine pages long.
Not gonna lie, even with the waiving this might just be the longest debate I have ever read.
Obviously you are ignoring the scope of the debate. There are 4200 religions, you have stated four. I don't really care how big the four are, you have to prove that most if not all religions are harmful
To be fair, I will not be voting on this debate, as I am biased.
Generally is never in the description as follows. Even if you don't mean all religions, which the resolution implies, you have to prove that most religions are harmful to society, which still you have not skimmed the top of. You haven't covered any Asian religions. There are an estimated 4200 religions in the world and you have stated four.
https://www.reference.com/world-view/many-religions-world-8f3af083e8592895
All you've proven is a set of Western-based religions are harmful to society. You have to prove that every religion is harmful to society, not most. Your burden of proof is gigantic, and you have barely skimmed the top lol
I see what you're saying. Racism is a loosely defined term.
I mean, again a religion is not a race. Hitler didn't really care about the race of the Jewish people, he just wanted them to be rid of because of his sick agenda.
Its not out of the question that he worshiped the Aryan "race" more than any other races, and seeked to destroy all the others.
I never said that Hitler wasn't racist. The debate is fine as is.
Where? All the sources I found agreed with my definition. (For context: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=racism&t=opera&ia=definition)
Have to disagree:"a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"
Being Jewish isn't a race
Nice
If you want to view Ragnar's look here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wgEoU2M4k7PvJZzvbwrjw8nOomkYqnBpDaLR4igvMe0/edit#heading=h.4gchlr7uwv2c
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MFdllQK7Kd3wEuSO9FKItsxMVhNmIdxfB3GOyYTTL5g/edit?usp=sharing
If Pro plays this right, he might win.
Thanks for the good advice, I'll try to improve my case later.
Can someone please vote? (Never mind MisterChris, you can vote.)
I just took a look at it. Nevermind.
It's called IBB? I should check it out then.
Whats I BB
Can someone please vote?
Can someone please vote?
bump
How tf is PRO supposed to win? How does a documentary make every single case of homosexuality nonsense?q
Vote bump
Most of the new users are multi-accounts of old users or trolls.
Vote
Humans are not the only sentient beings in the universe, I have a source saying this. The thing about this debate is that Water can't accept what objective morality is and it is impossible to prove. Objective morality is not only directed to humans, Water can't decide this based on what animals can't interpret morals. The only thing that we were debating about was the definition, and multiple sources prove Water wrong about what he thinks is objective morality, even my source says:
"In the end, humans are one species. While many religions believe that we are the only intelligent species, and that our creator was focused on us and our actions, someone who is more secular may point to the fact that there may be other intelligent life out there. What we believe to be objectively true may not be in some other galaxy, if you believe there is intelligent life out there.
Even without the aliens, animals have different morals as well. Some animals eat their own as a part of their life cycle. Almost all of us are disgusted over the idea of cannibalism. This is a moral inconsistency found on this earth."
bump