What do you think about this debate. Do you have any tips or tricks I could have used or any suggestions about what I did good and what I should have changed?
I also had this debate as my second or third. At the time the vote was cast I did not know that I should have reported it. But now I have returned and found it to be invalid.
I just have a habit of checking my debates that are about to run out to check for vote problems like "no votes". And this particular vote was particularly unfair.
The vote from Undefeatable does not contain any analysis of the arguments. It is an unfair vote, especially when you compare it to the two lengthy and detailed votes that have been cast. I think that there is NO way one can fairly let me loose because of a vote without proper justification. Could you please remove his vote?
But you made the change from "EVE could defeat star wars" to "Star Wars could defeat EVE", which severely skews the debate in your favor.
I am sorry, but the comics and the animated series contain way too much surprise and OP beings. So no.
However, you will make many decisions I will also have to follow. For example these two: location and your army. Adittionally, I only disallowed using the force to control EVE, lightsabers are still allowed.
vote bump
What do you think about this debate. Do you have any tips or tricks I could have used or any suggestions about what I did good and what I should have changed?
Vote bump
vote bump
vote bump
vote bump
My real view is OEC. This debate makes for an interesting case where I am the devil's advocate and God's advocate at the same time ( ಠ ͜ʖರೃ)
"""if the God has revealed that the Earth is young, then the natural data will point us to that conclusion"""
Ok. But which natural data points us to that conclusion? I could have used those.
Nice advice
vote bump
Excellent opening statement.
What do you think of my conclusion (▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿) ?
Do you have any ideas on how I could improve my arguments?
I reject this offer.
Feel free to open a forum page
vote bump
Impressive first round.
I also had this debate as my second or third. At the time the vote was cast I did not know that I should have reported it. But now I have returned and found it to be invalid.
Sorry for the late report.
I just have a habit of checking my debates that are about to run out to check for vote problems like "no votes". And this particular vote was particularly unfair.
The vote from Undefeatable does not contain any analysis of the arguments. It is an unfair vote, especially when you compare it to the two lengthy and detailed votes that have been cast. I think that there is NO way one can fairly let me loose because of a vote without proper justification. Could you please remove his vote?
vote bump
vote bump
vote bump
The vote from undefeatable also is not at all on par with the other ones.
I disagree with the vote from Undefeatable.
His vote ignores nearly all of our arguments and does not explain why PRO wins the arguments.
Sources to PRO because I used common sense? What is that nonsense of a reason to give PRO the sources point?
Figured I would argue for the other side. What do you think of my argument?
I think you might be interested in this debate.
Hope never dies.
A vote of mine doesn't get reported, yay : )
"It is a small vote for Theweakeredge but a giant leap for Benjamin".
The plant earth is less than 100.000 years. They are at most 10.000 years old.
I had to present a solid logical and scientific argument this round. I will turn to theology the next round.
it should be fixed now
Thank you for writing such a brilliant debate.
Thank you.
This debate was particularly hard for me so I would appreciate some feedback. Would any of you like to vote?
vote bump
vote bumb
vote bum
vote bum
This might be a debate worth voting on. I would appreciate it if one of you did : )
Excellent work both of you. I have never read a better or more objective debate on this topic. I will cast a vote when I finish reading it.
This debate is when Trump Quotes and arguments from quantum mechanics will be strong.
"The same vote would be tolerable if it did not assign points."
Good Idea, I will keep that in mind.
I apologize. I am new to debating online, and I am sorry for creating inconvenience. Please forgive me.
Lmao.
It was obviously a troll vote - I know the system and had I really wanted to harm you I would have made a valid point.
The age-old question is being discussed:
https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy84NTU2OTEzL29yaWdpbi5qcGciLCJleHBpcmVzX2F0IjoxNjU3OTE1NjMyfQ.xQt3TrgZwPfKkpwSQ4DOQlyL2bsrkZJiq4dcAKkc0_E/img.jpg?width=980
Negative. Donald Trump has finished his inside work on earth and has traveled back to Zargor.
Force telepathy = Instawin
EMP weapons = Instawin
Continuous reinforcements for infinity = Instawin
As you can see, the rules set in place have only eliminated your instawins, not your means of actually fighting EVE.
But you made the change from "EVE could defeat star wars" to "Star Wars could defeat EVE", which severely skews the debate in your favor.
I am sorry, but the comics and the animated series contain way too much surprise and OP beings. So no.
However, you will make many decisions I will also have to follow. For example these two: location and your army. Adittionally, I only disallowed using the force to control EVE, lightsabers are still allowed.
Is that true?
Well, then the Zargors really did create the pyramids. Afterall the Illuminati is just their agents here on earth.
I can't fathom how ignorant you are of basic facts.
We all know that the EARTH MICE created the pyramids, not the Zargors from Kepler-42
Thank you for your understanding.