Total posts: 1
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Although you have conveniently quoted the rules as the reason for the escalation of my banning (e.g. using a second account in order to circumvent being stopped from initiating threads) it may be worth reviewing the following.
The reason given for being suspended for making threads in the first place was:
Given the previous hard warning
I was not aware of a previous warning (the preceding post), so I did not (willingly) defy such a warning. Upon reading the second post I sent you a message of apology. My message was ignored and not replied to.
The example of your reasoning in the second post was completely incorrect. You misquoted:
Accusing people of having boils on their asses for which they refuse medical treatment
Whereas, I actually stated:
........is going to cure the boil on your backside in favour over all the hundreds of thousands of parents around the world simultaneously praying, whose kids are dying from the most horrendous diseases.
Meaning; I hope that God would give priority to helping dying and suffering children above curing a petty complaint by a self-centered individual.
We then see you continue with:
behave or we'll more directly help you behave.
and:
we take your continued behavior to be a request for help with your impulse control.
Surely, are you not guilty of breaking your own rules in order to unfairly castigate somebody else?
In other words, "designed to provoke" and "(rife) with insults."
I have made valuable, thought-provoking and ethical contributions to social forums for many years and to be singled out in such a manner I think is unfair. Perhaps you could bring it upon yourself to review your decisions.
Created: