Buddamoose

This valley is dark and full of terrors

(Was it your plan to have every woman in the house touching you sympathetically? Because we both are. You sly dog 😉)

I AM NEW YORK!

Also when i am not on, i nominated the homie Budda to keep track of votes.

Ireena, confused: I don't understand, if she wanted the children alive, why would she kill this one?

She might have technically violated the California statute

 18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury generally-  having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(2)

in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

is guilty of perjury

She might have technically violated the California statute, but perjury? Nope.

Psychologist: an expert or specialist in psychology.

She is a professor of clinical psychology. I would say that makes her both an expert and specialist in psychology, whether or not California requires a license to practice psychology.

She is a professor of clinical psychology. I would say that makes her both an expert and specialist in psychology, whether or not California requires a license to practice psychology.

Bwuahahahahahahaha, any port in a straw

Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.

Aside from potentially misleading the committee, Ford also appears to have violated California law. California’s Business and Professional Code Sections 2900-2919 govern the state’s laws for practicing psychology. Section 2903 reads, “No person may engage in the practice of psychology, or represent himself or herself to be a psychologist, without a license granted under this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” Section 2902(c) states: (c) “A person represents himself or herself to be a psychologist when the person holds himself or herself out to the public by any title or description of services incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ ‘psychologist,’ ‘psychology consultation,’ ‘psychology consultant,’ ‘psychometry,’ ‘psychometrics’ or ‘psychometrist,’ ‘psychotherapy,’ ‘psychotherapist,’ ‘psychoanalysis,’ or ‘psychoanalyst,’ or when the person holds himself or herself out to be trained, experienced, or an expert in the field of psychology

Whereas the term “research psychologist” may be common in academic parlance, and permissible within accredited institutions, the issue seems to be publicly presenting oneself under any title containing the word “psychologist” if a person is not licensed. Ford is a professor and a researcher, but not a psychologist. Section 2910 of the law states, “This chapter shall not be construed to restrict the practice of psychology on the part of persons who are salaried employees of accredited or approved academic institutions, public schools, or governmental agencies, if those employees are complying with the following (1) Performing those psychological activities as part of the duties for which they were hired. (2) Performing those activities solely within the jurisdiction or confines of those organizations. (3) Do not hold themselves out to the public by any title or description of activities incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ or ‘psychologist

Pelosi aint getting her crumbs back anytime soon, and you'll just have to deal with that reality.

The employment figures PALE in comparison to Obama's drop

What's off is the fact that the outside of the building shows signs of attack, the windows are all boarded up, and there is a dead body in a coffin in a side room)

Seriously, Ismark. This is who you find?

I'd just as soon see if they are involved straight away. How better than confronting them with the evidence

that's not likely to happen. You don't make another sworn statement once you already have. 

Perjury traps exist. 

You do look like an old child.

We bringbsad tidings I'm afraid. Eikka hefts the sack. I'm afraid we were too late to save this one

Ismark! There is a giant lizard, an old child, a black and white elf, and an orc saying they know you. WHAT ARE YOU UP TO NOW ISMARK?!

From behind the door, a female voice. Who is it?

After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.”

The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.

Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.
According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.
Ford also does not appear to have been licensed in any other states outside California. Since graduating with a PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996 it does not appear Ford has spent any significant amount of time outside the state. She married her husband in California in 2002, and completed a master’s degree in California in 2009. She reportedly completed an internship in Hawaii, but a search of Hawaii’s Board of Psychology licensing database also did not turn up any results for Ford.

Seems there are fiends aplenty in this town. I think we should make them sorry we ever arrived

I mean. Can you imagine the absurdity of some dumb senator grilling the Judge on his yearbook from when he was 17, some 36 years ago?

My god that was idiotic

Also, Democrats refused to allow Judge to testify because they knew he would make Ford look bad

Because he and his good drinking buddy Mark Judge would be put under oath.

🍆💦🍆💦

The child is as dead as a door nail and no amount of healing magic appears to change that fact

Ooh, you're going to tell the town. She cackles. Who do you think gave me the child?! Take him back, the meat goes bad once they die. Trust me, little gnome, I'll be getting compensation one way or another.

Suddenly she vanishes out of sight.

Inside the bag is a small child. It appears as if all of his bones have been shattered.

Please! Please don't hurt me anymore! Take the pies! For free! You can have as many as you want. It's all I have!

if the villagers come and can't be "persuaded" I will throw you under the bus, since you'd fit under it so easily lol

less dangerous and destructive that way

(I'll check the bag)

Just know that if you ever use the eye-roll emoji, I will instantly push for your lynch no matter what you claim

Let's get some players in the game

Drafter and I didnt know jani role would be revealed.