David

Would love to get your vote

I just read your argument. You miss one thing: DA users don’t go spamming on DI or other debate sites about how great their platform is compared to theirs. Haha. Yeah

Yeah I worded it awkwardly. Rebuttals include all rebuttals and defense is defense of your arguments and the rebuttals.

Ok cool. Thanks for the vote

Ok cool. I didn’t know people could delete their own votes. I appreciate the thorough review

«sylweb» has published a new vote for the debate «Minimum wage»

Please re vote if you can. For some reason it’s not showing up

I’m sad this was a tie

Thanks. I enjoy short debates like this sometimes

Would like some votes on this please. Short debate and shoudl be an easy vote

More characters and more rounds. Round 1 should have been arguments. It’s impossible to make a strong opening case and rebut your points in R2 with less than 1k characters.

Though ultimately I have a stronger BOP than you do

If you want we can make this a 3 round debate and just waive the fourth round

My grandfather passed away this evening. I will try to get my arguments in on time.

Fair enough. Yeah all cops are basically pigs. I don't trust the police and serious reform is needed

Fair enough. I ff’d two rounds and would hate for my opponent to have this debate a tie. Would still like argument feedback though

The debate info and stuff can be entered separately so the first round can be used for arguments instead of acceptance only

Would love some solid votes on this debate

Truth be told I don’t really believe the position I argued for. I wanted to try a devil’s advocate/foreign policy debate.

What did you think of my arguments

It’s alright. I hope we can debate again sometime

All reports are completely anonymous. We don’t even know who’s reporting it, which imo is a good thing.

please wait till sunday to post response if you can

please vote

Fair enough. I like depth.

Mind waiting till Sunday to post arguments?

Lol. I think you're a fairly solid debater. Though to be fair the majority of your debates were with Type1. Anyone who loses to them should feel bad

Thanks so much for accepting! I've been really wanting to debate you on a topic

Debate over. Would love your vote

Honor and trump should never be used in the same sentence

I respect that. It can be difficult playing devil’s advocate especially when you’re passionate about the topic

Thank you!!

Will post after work. Thanks

Hey I'm really sorry for forfeiting. I had a lot going on. Thanks for the debate. Would love to revisit this topic

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Juubi_Wolf// Mod action: Removed

>Points Awarded:7 points to con

>Reason for Decision: 1=1.000000000
1 does not equal .9999999

>Reason for Mod Action: The voter does not explain any of the points that we awarded. .
************************************************************************

You waive the last round not the first round

I know. Growing up I heard this argument millions of times.

Correct.

Remind me when this is over to vote on this

==================================================================
>Reported vote: drafterman // Moderator action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Pro (arguments). RFD in comments.

Reason for not removal: drafterman’a RFD thoroughly analyzes sourcss and more than sufficiently meeets the votin standard.
==================================================================

Following!

No it hasn’t. I can leave your vote up because I forfeited and you voted against me. No reason to remove it.

If you want a proper debate on free will I’ll gladly send you a challenge

*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: the_bat_man// Mod action: Removed<

2 points awarded. Reasons for voting decision: I object. If Earth wanted judges he/she should have set up the debate as a judge panel process.

[*Reason for removal*] Vote fails to properly explain his vote.
************************************************************************

*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: JCEuroVision96 // Mod action: Removed<

3 points awarded. Reasons for voting decision: Pro made very clear views on the existence of God, while Con dodges his attack.

[*Reason for removal*] JCEuroVision96 voted for the forfeiting side.
************************************************************************

Thanks for your feedback! I understand your conduct point to pro and that you feel I was intentionally lazy. Unfortunately real life shit just got in the way. I definitely feel like I should have done much better this debate

True.

I’ll vote on this later tonight or tomorrow

I was just thinking the way you had it worded it looked like you were arguing against international law

Yeah it’ll be interesting to follow.

Just a thought - it may be better for you to frame this in he positive and have you take the pro position.

Posted round 2!