Defender

Full forfeit from pro. However, I believe that our contender have become too radical in here.

Full forfeit from pro.

Full forfeit. No reason to vote any others except pro.

Con forfeited everything, and thus should be regarded as a conceit.

Con's argument does seems to be a madman's thought. In the Bible's teaching, there had never been any word of God commanded killing. The only time he brought sword and fire upon Jerusalem was because of the sins they have committed. Of course, like everyone else before me, I will say that con's argument have no real meaning and isn't logical. It is a simple decision as con based nearly all of his argument upon personal interpretation, instead of a solid evidence.

Pro didn't actually provide an opinion of his own, only arguing the pro have no real case to be supported. Despite without any opinion, this debate is a easy pick for the pro side.