Total votes: 10
Sir. Lancelot was the better rapper here
I feel Con was the better debater here. Pro does not know how to pick songs, they are all trash
I could be petty and pick FishChaser as winner for the rap battle since RM voted for him as winner in our rap battle that I clearly won but it's all good I won't be petty. RM clearly won just like I clearly won against FishChaser. Good rap battle.
Both opponents did well but I'll give the edge to RM. Vinnie Paz is dope
Pro full forfeit
Lyricism - RM
Flow - Lancelot
Diss - Lancelot
Rhyme - Tie
===
Round 1 was RM's best round imo
Round 3 was Lancelot's best round imo
===
Favorite bars from Lancelot:
"Ground-punt you at a speed of light velocity.
You were unprepared for my relentless ferocity."
"You let me strangle you till you went blue in the face, Smurf.
Dragged you here just to prove I could kick your ass on your own turf." Clever bars and rhymes. "blue in the face, Smurf" was too cold.
Favorite disses from Lancelot:
"All traumatized, from that time you were licking my cum out your wife’s punani’s." That was funny.
"So fuck you. I don’t owe you jack.
How bout you quit smoking that crack." Hilarious.
"Accusing me of backstabbing you and badger, as if I pledged my loyalty to either one of you retards.
We were never pals. I’d never be homies with slimy scum." That was lethal.
===
Favorite bars from RM:
"You might pucker up 'n' say you did this challenge, had to provoke you fight you, I'm too skilled at this, and my Kung Fu moves got you startled, that's strike 2,
Where's the first? I'm Mike, dude, I'm Tyson I write this I bite on the ear, no fear, that's a tight move" Really like the Mike Tyson/bite on the ear flip.
"But you see that rope 'round my autistic neck that you disrespected's one that's been there when I've been lower than you'll ever have to go, build a moat,
King Arthur needs protection and you pushed the boat,
I'm a pirate, a ninja, samurai to your throat," Loved this rhyme scheme.
Favorite diss from RM:
"raggy shit-stain boxers, shriveled up dick with the itchy rash trapped in" Lethal and hilarious.
===
Super close battle, both of y'all did great. Lancelot dropped straight bomb after bomb each bar and imo when it came to the disses they were more lethal. Gotta give props RM's unorthodox style and is super lyrical. Don't think I ever gave props to RM before but I am now. RM statement is right "I realised some of my longer lines don't seem to flow to average readers even if they imagine me saying it fast." I feel as though if you hear him rap what he says in real life it's easier to follow than reading on a screen on first read. I can catch most stuff but not every single thing. Lancelot's flow was just easier to follow plus got to the punch quicker. Not a diss or bad thing towards RM. He just raps different. I also get to the punchline quick too. RM is more intricate and it's more of a build-up and when it gets there it hits hard.
Con sucks. Literally couldn't bother to read past their round 1. Retarded af and doesn't know how to debate.
ARGUMENT:
I cannot give points to someone who didn't show up at all compared to someone who showed an argument, and actually typed.
Easy pro win, although I disagree with pro. This should be a fleshed out debate with more rounds and way more time for arguments than just two hours.
R1:
First Con provided a false definition of mama mia in the description then Con proceeds to use a bible verse which is unrelated to the topic.
Pro provided an excellent and solid argument and provided the correct definition of mama mia.
R2:
Con did not rebuttal any of Pro's arguments and points in R1. Con loses conduct points for saying "you dork"
Pro yet again provides another solid argument.
Rounds 3-5:
Con provides no arguments/rebuttals for the rest of the debate. Also loses more conduct points by calling Pro a "bitch" in R3.
Pro asks Con to extend arguments but that never happened.
Arguments go to Pro | Pro provided arguments for R1 and R2 and Con didn't rebuttal and/or give any arguments in return to defend their side.
Sources go to Pro | Pro provided sources for R1 and R2 of their arguments and Con never provided any.
Legibility go to Pro | This also goes to Pro. I feel they had more legibility with their grammar and their arguments were clear.
Conduct goes to Pro | Pro had a great attitude the whole time and had better conduct than Con whereas Con called Pro out of their name.