Dr.Franklin

6) Reduce the abortion rate by expanding access to contraception.

Also my most regularly occurring random thought is that I should make an onlyfans. Bitches making too much money out here. 

I can sleep more comfortably not only knowing russia is apparently allowed to hack anything else, but that they have a list of the 16 targets that would harm us the most https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1405217452879925251?s=19

it would not resist or fight us.

I was actually pointing out that the Character referred to as Jesus, was never attributed a sexuality by any of the plot writers.

First thing you start off AGAIN in not showing respect to Jesus!!!!   You said "God" instead of "Jesus," where I told you that when using the term "God" is not specifying which God you are referring too, GET IT?  Therefore I am assuming you are talking about JESUS  instead of Allah or Yahweh, then as only one example of many within the scriptures, JESUS, AS YAHWEH GOD INCARNATE, was a blatant serial killer when He initited His Great Flood by killing hundreds of thousands upon thousands of His creation because He was upset with them (Genesis 6:5-6).  Yes, Jesus in the Flood killed innocent zygotes, fetus' and babies as their mothers watched in horror their babies drowning, and as Jesus watched as well! (Hebrews 4:13)

We see once again that you are truly having a hard time in "reading comprehension" regarding the explicit accountings of Jesus being TOTALLY NAKED in front of His disciples in the John 13: 3-5 passage which is very sad on your part.  The only thing that Jesus and I can do is to give you an online class in helping you understand the English langange and the correct way of using it for your betterment at the following link, where you can thank me later: https://tutoring.greatleaps.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI2uScv-7x8AIVwht9Ch2k7QNdEAAYAyAAEgJE5_D_BwE

Dr. Franklin, if you cannot accept the Christian biblical axioms shown above, have you ever thought that you are in the wrong religion of Christianity?  Remember, YOU DO NOT have the authority to rewrite the scriptures in the way that you want them to be, over the direct writing of the scriptures from Jesus' inspired words (2 Peter 1:20-21), understood?  BLASPHEME!

.

That is, your study found that while lockdowns did not impact the percentage of infected who got very sick and died (why would it?), lockdowns did very effectively reduce the overall number of cases which kept healthcare from being overwhelmed and so lockdowns were strongly associated faster recovery rates, LESS transmission and better outcomes overall.  Even a year ago, this paper was strongly promoting the benefits of a full lockdown.

A year later, this paper is still not published but the paper's primary speculation, that herd immunity from coronavirus can be achieved when 17%-20% of the population is infected has been resoundingly disproved by actual events and doesn't seem to comprehend how herd immunity actually works.  How would 1 person in 5 break the chain of transmission?  Kuhbandner, et al. based that speculation on Diamond Princess cruise, although the fact that so many of the crew got infected compared to relatively few passengers ought to serve more as evidence that isolating passengers was an important protective measure.

So this paper makes no inference regarding  the effectiveness of lockdowns, but suggests that the public was already self-quarantining and so reducing infection rates before the lockdowns began- which does not seem unreasonable supposition.

This paper's conclusion are drawn from data prior to Mar 24, 2020 and so studied less than 1/10th of 1% of all 5 million UK cases.

So here is a non-scientist predicting in mid-April of 2020 that the coronavirus just naturally plays itself out after 70 days and will no longer be a problem by mid-May.  What actually happened was that the number of total cases more than doubled from 2 million to 4.5 million.  One year later the disease has not played itself out and in fact continues to mutate into increasingly tough variants.  There are now 171 million cases and that number will continue to increase for the next couple of years.  This speculation was thoroughly discredited more than one year ago.

The American Institute for Economic Research is best known for the Great Barrington Declaration of last October which called on governments to halt all prevention and vaccination programs and allow herd immunity to solve the epidemic which statement was almost universally condemned by healthcare professionals, noting that libertarian economists are not healthcare experts.  The US's leading infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci called the declaration "total nonsense" and "unscientific."

fatemperor/Ivor Cummins was an engineer promoting Keto diets before coining the term CASEDEMIC last summer, which is shorthand for a theory that COVID-19 is entirely harmless and the only reason we are tracking increased infections is due to increased testing, which theory scientists dismiss as conspiracy mongering and disinformation.

I should point out that while your evidence is thoroughly discredited, each submission contradicts the others.  Did public panic do more to prevent the disease's spread than lockdowns or did the disease just die out after 70 days?  Is COVID actually harmless or is herd immunity achieved at 17% infection rates?  It is as if you don't care whether your sources are consistent or in agreement, just so long as the scientific consensus is brought into question, no matter how disreputable or obviously wrong the claimant.

As the membership can readily see, you cannot comprehend the following passage where JESUS WAS TOTALLY NAKED in front of His disciples in the following "revealing" passage!  “Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands, and that He had come forth from Father and was going back to Father, got up from supper, and laid aside His garments; and taking a towel, He girded Himself. Then He poured water into the basin, and began to wash the disciples' feet and to wipe them with the towel with which He was girded” (John 13: 3-5)  

1. "He laid aside His garments"

2.  "And taking a towel, He girded Himself"

3.  "And to wipe them with a towel which he was girded."

It's as if female attention and loyalty meant absolutely nothing to him.