"Quran has never been changed"
Quran has been changed. May I suggest you do more looking?
"No contradictions in the Quran"
There are contradictions in the Quran
"No errors or copious errors in the Quran"
There are errors or copious errors in the Quran. You want me to do what Novice_II did and quote you Muhammad Mustafa Al-Azami"
"we must nevertheless take into consideration that there are over 250,000 manuscripts of the Qur’an scattered all over the globe. When comparing them it is always possible to find copying mistakes here and there; this is an example of human fallibility, and has been recognized as such by authors who have written extensively on the subject of “unintentional errors.”
"The Quran could not be from anything other than God. "
The Quran could not be from God, as you haven't done the research.
"Bible errors and contradictions"
The Bible doesn't have errors or contradictions, and those passages you quoted are cherry-picked.
"This is actually the opposite of the Bible, which has been corrupted and changed. "
This is actually the opposite of the Quran, which has been corrupted and changed.
Side note, not to an insult, but given you're 16, I can tell you don't know any better (Or shows that you have been indoctrinated).
Long time no see. You should look at backwardseden's YouTube channel (Especially the discussion tab). https://www.youtube.com/user/nirvanaispus/featured
"that con failed to tackle head on."
Are you sure? And, that's sounds like wishful thinking. Also, pro's sources are the best exmple of gish gallop. Plus, you're still adding something into the text.
You mean cherry-picking Jewish scholars? I was the one who brorught multiple evidence, not you. And, you're saying Michael Heiser isn't good? For Deut 21, dishonor =/= rape.
Those children will grow, and will see their tribe's past. Do you understand what I'm saying? Doesn't make it eaiser? Plus, aren't the Midianites mentioned in Jugdes 6?
And, citing a Muslim site? I can do that as well. http://www.christian-thinktank.com/midian.html
"If God doesn't exist, that means her never gave any moral edicts and things like slavery and homophobia and circumcision, etc ,etc."
Where God endorse those? And, don't cite Old testament passages.
You do know that I have respond to your arguments, right? And, if you want to know what the comment is, here it is.
Do you need studies to show that Christianity is the cause of that. Also, don't cite Matthew 5:18. And, 1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel B. Wallace's work on this one. Also, the NT says that a woman's hair is here covering. In fact, you should read the book "Women and Worship at Corinth". And, stoning gays was done away.
Jesus wasn't a communist. And, love of money is rooted in all evil. Also, the word agape doesn't mean modern sentimentality. Again,1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes.
Sources: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Worship-Corinth-Rhetorical-Corinthians/dp/1498201466
https://faithfulphilosophy.wordpress.com/2018/09/04/how-matthew-5-doesnt-prove-we-should-continue-following-the-old-testament/
1 Timothy 2:12 is Paul was responding to a heresy. And 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is Paul quoiting something that the Corinthians said to him, which he then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel Wallace's work on this. As for slavery, I suggest you read Exodus 21:16, and Ephesians 6:9.
The reason why the father knows that day, is because Jesus was both fully God and fully man, and have to willingly cooperate the limitations of being man. Also, I heard that Eusebius and Justin Martyr have argued that Plato was influenced under the teaching of Moses. So, meaning that the connection could be the other way around.
Do you need studies to show that Christianity is the cause of that. Also, don't cite Matthew 5:18. And, 1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel B. Wallace's work on this one. Also, the NT says that a woman's hair is here covering. In fact, you should read the book "Women and Worship at Corinth". And, stoning gays was done away.
Jesus wasn't a communist. And, love of money is rooted in all evil. Also, the word agape doesn't mean modern sentimentality. Again,1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes.
Forgot this exist. Kid, what makes you think WeaponX is wrong, even though WeaponX is right?
Dawah script at its finest.
"Quran has never been changed"
Quran has been changed. May I suggest you do more looking?
"No contradictions in the Quran"
There are contradictions in the Quran
"No errors or copious errors in the Quran"
There are errors or copious errors in the Quran. You want me to do what Novice_II did and quote you Muhammad Mustafa Al-Azami"
"we must nevertheless take into consideration that there are over 250,000 manuscripts of the Qur’an scattered all over the globe. When comparing them it is always possible to find copying mistakes here and there; this is an example of human fallibility, and has been recognized as such by authors who have written extensively on the subject of “unintentional errors.”
"The Quran could not be from anything other than God. "
The Quran could not be from God, as you haven't done the research.
"Bible errors and contradictions"
The Bible doesn't have errors or contradictions, and those passages you quoted are cherry-picked.
"This is actually the opposite of the Bible, which has been corrupted and changed. "
This is actually the opposite of the Quran, which has been corrupted and changed.
Side note, not to an insult, but given you're 16, I can tell you don't know any better (Or shows that you have been indoctrinated).
"Islam does not oppress women"
Quran 4:34 might want to talk to you.
Christianity is more true than Islam because pedophilia is wrong. That's your logic there.
Forfeited
Long time no see. You should look at backwardseden's YouTube channel (Especially the discussion tab). https://www.youtube.com/user/nirvanaispus/featured
What now?
"that con failed to tackle head on."
Are you sure? And, that's sounds like wishful thinking. Also, pro's sources are the best exmple of gish gallop. Plus, you're still adding something into the text.
What makes you think that people who side with me are wrong?
The Christian cited evidence for his claims. While, Muslims cherry-picked and poison the well. And, killing of children?
Plus, have you cited those Jewish scholars because they agree with you?
You mean cherry-picking Jewish scholars? I was the one who brorught multiple evidence, not you. And, you're saying Michael Heiser isn't good? For Deut 21, dishonor =/= rape.
Those children will grow, and will see their tribe's past. Do you understand what I'm saying? Doesn't make it eaiser? Plus, aren't the Midianites mentioned in Jugdes 6?
And, citing a Muslim site? I can do that as well. http://www.christian-thinktank.com/midian.html
I should note that Ibn_HAM (Master.NO) will repeat the same comment about Numbers 31 over and over again.
If you see the "Publish argument" button, click on it. And, you can lay out your arguments.
I thought of letting a Muslim by the name of "Master.NO" in, since he thinks Jesus somehow mentioned in there. But, I think he won't come in.
I will address that in the debate.
Then, provide evidence.
Sorry.
I know this topic quite well. So, I will most luckly will win this one.
Ok.
I hold the flood to be a local flood.
I said that they are related to each other.
Are we new here?
I said "However, not every difference between men and women are socially constructed, but rather have they origin in human biology."
"If God doesn't exist, that means her never gave any moral edicts and things like slavery and homophobia and circumcision, etc ,etc."
Where God endorse those? And, don't cite Old testament passages.
I said they are related to each other.
You need studies which shows that Christianity is the cause of that.
And, that he keep on posting the same debates over and over.
The father is greater is position, not essence. And, ranks doesn't mean one is created.
You do know that I have respond to your arguments, right? And, if you want to know what the comment is, here it is.
Do you need studies to show that Christianity is the cause of that. Also, don't cite Matthew 5:18. And, 1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel B. Wallace's work on this one. Also, the NT says that a woman's hair is here covering. In fact, you should read the book "Women and Worship at Corinth". And, stoning gays was done away.
Jesus wasn't a communist. And, love of money is rooted in all evil. Also, the word agape doesn't mean modern sentimentality. Again,1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes.
Sources: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Worship-Corinth-Rhetorical-Corinthians/dp/1498201466
https://faithfulphilosophy.wordpress.com/2018/09/04/how-matthew-5-doesnt-prove-we-should-continue-following-the-old-testament/
1 Timothy 2:12 is Paul was responding to a heresy. And 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is Paul quoiting something that the Corinthians said to him, which he then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel Wallace's work on this. As for slavery, I suggest you read Exodus 21:16, and Ephesians 6:9.
The reason why the father knows that day, is because Jesus was both fully God and fully man, and have to willingly cooperate the limitations of being man. Also, I heard that Eusebius and Justin Martyr have argued that Plato was influenced under the teaching of Moses. So, meaning that the connection could be the other way around.
"Pro literally schooled con."
Wishful thinking are there, kid.
Ok. Benediximus (Latin for Good luck)
Well, this sucks
I will try again next time.
Fix it.
"This is false because they lived during the same time."
Would that be question begging?
My view is that the flood was a local flood.
Yeah, I shouldn't have said that.
Yeah, I couldn't really say that.
I noticed you didn't respond to my comment.
And, I have respond to the argument that Ramshutu gave.
I will read it next time.
Do you need studies to show that Christianity is the cause of that. Also, don't cite Matthew 5:18. And, 1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes. I suggest you read Daniel B. Wallace's work on this one. Also, the NT says that a woman's hair is here covering. In fact, you should read the book "Women and Worship at Corinth". And, stoning gays was done away.
Jesus wasn't a communist. And, love of money is rooted in all evil. Also, the word agape doesn't mean modern sentimentality. Again,1 Corinthians 14 is Paul quoting something that the Corinthians originally said to him, which the then refutes.
Sources: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Worship-Corinth-Rhetorical-Corinthians/dp/1498201466
https://faithfulphilosophy.wordpress.com/2018/09/04/how-matthew-5-doesnt-prove-we-should-continue-following-the-old-testament/
Christmas is not pagan. Also, theistic evolution, anyone?
"We have NO evidence of Paul outside the Bible – including the Jewish Talmud"
Argument from silence is a fallacy btw.
"There is NO records of Jesus anywhere in the Talmud;"
Have you read it?
Intersex is a birth defect.