Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
We will just let other voters decide, but I think you are well aware that you lost this game, irrelevant of if I get lynched or not.
Are you bussing Pie bro?
Created:
Posted in:
Also, I will both VTL Wylted with mail in ballot AND in person.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Clearly, a family fun wholesome game like FNAF could be town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I refuse to confirm your wild theory about me being FNAF since it's clearly an evil game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
i mean theres like 100 indie games, how could you know this
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I just found it weird that you both knew I was FNAF and also that pie knew it somehow.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
You could interpret it as "superior" but the article doesn't have that binary choice in the analysis.
It simply explains why you would view Peterson as a crazy person.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
Wylted is scum because I know it . You should know it too.
Otherwise you are scum too.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I am open to other possibilities
Another clear scum slip.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Wylted said he was scum. Vote Wylted. This is a clear scumslip
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Why did whiteflame die. Did they think he was a cop or something?
They probably knew he was a cop. Bastards.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
They are though. Read the article if you are still confused.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Jordan peterson is a lunatic. Starting any sentence with Jordan Peterson talks about" is a pretty good way to get any thoughtful person to just tune you out because you obviously don't have anything interesting to say.
This is what I was alluding to in post #3
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
The 5 main ways of thinking:
- Inner speaking/ inner monologue - Ex. talking to yourself, hearing your voice or someone else or audibly recalling a phone number.
- Inner seeing/ visual imagery - Thoughts with a visual symbol. Ex. picturing a memory or a place you wish you lived.
- Feelings - A conscious experience of emotional process. Ex. feeling sad after the death of a loved one.
- Unsymbolized thinking - No word or image associated with thoughts. Ex. pouring your morning coffee without telling yourself to.
- Sensory awareness- Paying attention to a sensory aspect of the environment for an unimportant reason. Ex. hearing someone talk but seeing the light reflecting off their glasses.
According to Hulburt, not many people have an inner monologue 100 per cent of the time, but most do sometimes. He estimates that inner monologue is a frequent thing for 30 to 50 per cent of people.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
Really, I come back from school to find 7k speedlynched. Currently catching up.
I got speedlynched :(
Created:
-->
@WyIted
You re literally a proponent of double taxing. Is it not true that you would see capital gains taxed, dividends of those business owners also taxed and then also have the businesses themselves taxed and then consumers at the point of sale taxed? This is like a quadruple tax.
It is a quadruple tax. At what point does the share actually become fair?
Created:
-->
@FishChaser
So you agree with the Science article?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
This isn't what the discussion is about. Some people have internal voices. The other half of the world thinks having internal voices makes you crazy.
Created:
If you ever struggle to understand why things are the way they are and why life is so terribly frustrating, remember that 50% of the population don't even have an inner monologue and they get to vote too.
Jordan Peterson talks about this, in the sense that when you think in your own head, you’re allowing yourself to practice ideas that are dangerous or unsuccessful, thus allowing the ideas to internally die rather than killing yourself with external experimentation.
This is the article behind the science.
Created:
Posted in:
If you are morally bankrupt like a Democrat, stealing comes as easily as pedophilia.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You respond to the risk of people not trusting election by making certain they will not trust elections.
+!
Created:
Posted in:
Greyparrot, claims Vanilla and the game seems like a basic point and click game with a repetitive horror theme, I think.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Ramadan and Dos Equis says to stay thirsty.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Clearly the Shaman cast a spell on them.
Created:
Is this guy a stone cold thug that should be shot to save the country?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Take signatures for instance. Nobody serious actually uses them for identity verification anymore. They died when handwriting became a lost art. When you sign something they don't check it, they just want it because it has value for legal precedent; your final act of consent.
That may be true, but it's just as easy to reject a ballot you don't like just because you decided the signatures do not match up perfectly. How would a person know they were getting disenfranchised? They wouldn't.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Amber
Since the modern Democrat party is the party of the rich, it logically follows that it is also the party of child trafficking.
Created:
-->
@Mall
Eugenics. Nuke the biological source of conflicts from orbit. It is the only way to be sure.
Created:
-->
@Mall
In an evolutionary sense where morals only persist if they survive the next generation of people, you could make the case under the "fit trait" paradigm that slavery is a "moral good" if it ensures the enslavers survive to the next generation, which will happen at some point to all life as resources dwindle and population grows.
Created:
Posted in:
You don't believe elections are valid, therefore they have not been proven to be valid.
That's a misrepresentation. The actual claim is that because there is no way to validate mail in ballots to any degree of certainty, then there is no way to be certain they are valid votes. The only process of validation relies heavily on signature verification, which is a completely arbitrary process.
For comparison, there is no arbitrary process when someone presents a valid ID to the polling worker. It either is the person or it is not. Verifiable.
It's truly a bizarre take that you would allow arbitrary vote disenfranchisement with arbitrary rejection of signatures when that would never happen if the person was there in person to assert his identity to a poll worker without fear or favor of an arbitrary process. All of a sudden, it becomes an issue when the right demands their voters to show up and vote in person because their vote may not be counted.... wonder why that's such an anathema to the left tribe?
Created:
Posted in:
There is no such thing as a system that doesn't ultimately require trust.Bitcoin.And yet no one invests in it.
Lol wut? That's a cartoonish claim. Not a single person buys Bitcoin?
In comparison, here are some words on a dollar bill:
In God we trust...
Reserve note...
The reserve requirement ratio in the United States varies depending on the size and type of banking institution but typically ranges from 0% to 10% for deposits. The rest of the value comes from trust.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
The saner parts of the country will continue to believe that being a competent president matters no matter how many "context" cultists defend Biden as a president unable to react in a positive way to anything that happens in the world.
Created:
No, it relies on the cartoonishly simplistic premise that being president is the only thing that matters. High inflation? Obviously Biden's fault. High gas prices? Biden's fault. Russia invades Ukraine? Biden's fault. Hammas attacks Israel? Who else's fault could that be? Of course it's Biden's fault.
Being president either matters or it does not. Of course Biden is going to cartoonishly blame everything on Putin when Biden fucks up, but the people didn't elect Putin. They elected Biden. They can also unelect him.
While your reflexive and cartoonish "context" defense seems on the surface to work in Biden's defense, in the end, it simply weakens him. A good example of this was Hur proclaiming Biden as too forgetful to be held responsible. If he is too unfit to stand trial; if he is too incompetent to be the responsible president that takes action, then the voters will have a say about that.
Was any of that Trump's fault? No, of course not.
Absolutely wrong. 15 days to slow the spread was entirely Trump's fault, which cascaded into a lockdown frenzy all around the country as state governors cowered in fear. The big difference of course is that Trump had 3 good years in balance with the 1 bad year. Biden has a grand total of zero good years according to the polls.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
6. LGBOkay Fair enough although the new GOP is pretty open to it
Wrong. LGB is also being pushed in schools. It's also part of the liberal quota system and it's next to impossible to get a movie about straight people produced in Hollywood today due to the soft ban on straight media.
Put a chick in it an make her gay is the norm.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I'll take your response to mean you are willing to join MAGA over the loss of your position.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
One of the sillier things you've said.
It absolutely was. In a Democracy, laws are an agreement where the people give up freedom in exchange for security. That is the social contract.
If a law is not part of a social contract, then it is just plain fiat from a dictator. Kind of like a TDS judge.
The legitimacy of laws in a democratic society derives from their alignment with the social contract and the consent of the governed, whereas laws imposed without such consent are clearly arbitrary exercises of power for the sake of power.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Setting aside the massive correlation/causation fallacy, it's cartoonishly simplistic.
I know, it relies on the cartoonishly simplistic premise that being president actually matters.
Created: