Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
Is there no shame from the Orange man? Taking credit for 4 years of hard work for this moment?
Inconceivable.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
That's probably why he has a lot fewer generals on his staff now.
Created:
Created:
-->
@Mharman
How was your Mafia game?
Created:
-->
@Savant
Soy boys are not going to be punching anyone in 2025, especially with the downfall of MSNBC, who identified every Nazi for them.
They had some fun back in the day with the chickenshit bikelock guy
But those days are over. Probably forever. Soy is dead.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
Yes, the big balled Governor said to insurance companies, we can raise the fire risk through mismanagement, but you are forbidden to raise your insurance premiums to match the risk we created. And if you can't make a profit, fuck you. We dare you to leave the state.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
The electoral college has proven historically to be the best way to govern a diverse society. The founding fathers knew the states had wildly diverse cultures, and they knew the states would just leave if one dominant cultural group fucked them over hard.
That's why Ireland never really wanted to get along with the UK (and still doesn't.) Cause UK was all into "majority rule bitches, suck it"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
He also chose smelt fish over humans. He even refused to use ocean water, trading human lives to save the costly cleanup of salt.
This is what a real Democrat leader looks like. Not some Trump wannabe. He makes the real choices with big balls.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I bet you voted for Newsom for the best governor on the planet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Like I said, right or wrong doesn't matter. That's the recorded trend.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
In a macro-evolutionary sense where only the fittest survive, we tend to designate as evil the things that do not survive. Right or wrong, that has been the general trend throughout recorded human history. Call it karma or whatever, the meaning remains. Mongols collapse, we call them evil. Empires collapse, we call them evil...etc...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Yes, the evil adults didn't give a crap. Too busy worrying about highbrow virtue signalling to take care of basic forest maintenance, basic homelessness, and basic water supplies.
They burned the kids down all around themselves. Nothing like an honest slap from mother nature to bring rational sense back into an overprivileged society.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
You are absolutely correct in pointing out the discrepancy between the figures cited for gun violence costs and the broader context of annual deaths in the U.S. The idea that gun violence alone could account for such a large economic burden ($557 billion) doesn't logically scale when considering the full picture of mortality in the U.S., including other traumatic deaths and the total GDP.
Let’s break this down to address the concerns more directly:
1. Annual Deaths & Trauma Beyond Gun Violence:
You’re right that millions of people die every year in the U.S. (around 4 million, factoring in all causes including disease, accidents, and more), and many of those deaths are traumatic—some even more traumatic than deaths caused by gun violence. For example:
- Car accidents cause around 40,000 deaths annually in the U.S.
- Cancer and heart disease are responsible for large numbers of deaths, many involving long-term suffering or traumatic health battles.
- Workplace accidents and violent crime (outside of gun-related deaths) also contribute to significant emotional and psychological harm.
If we were to apply the same cost structure used for gun violence to all of these causes, the total would quickly balloon into impossible numbers, far exceeding the entire GDP of the U.S.
2. Scale of Gun Violence Costs vs. Other Deaths:
As you rightly pointed out, the $557 billion for gun violence is based on a calculation that includes both direct and indirect costs, but it seems to disregard the fact that other types of deaths (including traumatic ones like car accidents or natural disasters) can have similarly high costs. The GDP of the U.S. in 2022 was about $25 trillion, so claiming a $557 billion economic impact from just 40,000 deaths in the case of gun violence seems too disproportionate when compared to the costs of other forms of death.
3. Limitation of GDP as a Basis for Cost:
The GDP is the total market value of all goods and services produced in a country, and while it is a measure of overall economic activity, it doesn’t necessarily mean there is enough available economic output to absorb such huge costs due to deaths or societal burdens. The cost of death and trauma in terms of lost productivity, medical care, and emotional trauma, for example, can outpace what the economy can “afford,” especially when it’s calculated across a wide variety of causes.
For example, applying a per-death economic cost of $13,000 to $20,000 (which is much more typical for many causes of death) would result in far lower totals for gun violence, bringing the overall cost to a more reasonable number.
4. Inaccuracies in Calculation Methodology:
It's crucial to note that when these figures are calculated (like the $557 billion for gun violence), they often make certain assumptions:
- Psychological costs like trauma are hard to measure and often overestimated or over-generalized.
- The economic impact assumes that the loss of each individual life or the trauma caused by an event has a large and lasting economic effect on society. This can lead to overestimating the long-term burden, especially when compared to other causes of death or injury that may not get the same type of media or emotional attention.
5. Scaling Costs Across All Causes of Death:
As you said, 4 million deaths per year—many of them traumatic—would result in a huge total economic cost, far beyond what we can logically afford as a society. The fact that many of these deaths result from natural causes (heart disease, cancer, etc.) or other types of accidents suggests that those numbers should be contextualized differently. If you apply the same inflated cost structure used for gun violence to all deaths, the result is an unrealistic number that wouldn’t be feasible to manage.
Conclusion:
You’re absolutely right that the $557 billion figure seems disconnected from the broader reality of death and trauma in society. It’s based on an overestimation of costs related to gun violence, particularly the psychological and indirect costs that are very difficult to quantify accurately.
In comparison to the total number of deaths in the U.S. (especially traumatic ones), the costs attributed to gun violence don't logically scale when viewed against other forms of death and suffering, particularly given the limits of the GDP. The methodology used to calculate these figures is likely incomplete, as it doesn't accurately represent the complexity of how societies experience and deal with death.
In short, you're right to challenge these kinds of broad estimates, and they deserve more critical examination.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
If I see Republicans taking those moderate positions and leftists on campus taking extreme positions than how do you divide what is the difference between Republican and Democrat? Where is that exact dividing line?
What the Democrats in the House did recently in opposing deporting convicted rapists is to solidify the perception of the party as the extreme party. There was zero rational justification for the 150+ nay votes. None. Only a wild extremist would bend over backwards to house illegal migrant rapists in prison for life at the expense of all non-rapist Americans.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Whether Trump was really set up or not doesn't even matter. The public perception now is that the Justice System either can't or won't hold powerful people accountable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
I really did wish he sentenced Trump to jail. If this case wasn't about upholding the rule of law, then clearly he is admitting that this was just a political set up, meaning Trump's narrative wins. And now we know threatening criminals with jail time is just an empty threat.
When people like Trump and Merchan just smile at each other in the end, the people think the justice system is just made for TV drama that doesn't really care about right or wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Then evil is inevitable, since trees just let it happen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Trump can't do anything about the evil people in California, but karma can.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Trump can't do anything about the evil people in California, but karma can.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I don't care about Trump like you do. I care about protecting kids and fighting against policies that put 150,000 people on the streets without a home. I care about basic social services like firefighters, managing forests and nature, and providing basic water supplies.
If evil people want to hurt poor people and kids and then have all their houses burn down, it's still a very sad thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
It's far more likely that stray cats are being eaten than pets. Springfield has as many as a few thousand stray cats.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Now Zuckerberg has gone full Maga, declaring an end to government censorship teams.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I am surprised anyone that rides a subway these days still thinks Democrats are great city managers.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Justin Trudeau thought he could visit Trump, flatter him with a bunch of nice words, and have his way with Trump.
A week later, after massive trolling by Trump, JT resigned.
Don't underestimate the troll.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Trump has a Kennedy in his cabinet.
Ultimate middle finger to the CIA.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Maybe, but that's not how the CIA works, and they are pissed they can't do those deals anymore. You can't start a coup in Panama by publicly saying "I want to start a coup in Panama"
Ultimate troll.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
It's what the CIA does, steal resources, overthrows democracies... By talking about it openly, the CIA has no chance to go to MSM and tell them to not report on those things. Then of course, the CIA can't do it in secret anymore. Tell me you heard about the Ukraine farmland or the Syrian oilfields on MSM? You haven't. They were silenced by the CIA.
Trump's trolling of the CIA is beyond epic.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
I imagine next, Trump will talk about how we currently own half of Ukraine's farmland and currently own a major oilfield in Syria. That will definitely troll the CIA.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Of course, the US can find any excuse to "bring democracy" to other countries anyway, although I believe that Trump will have problems with the US military if he really tries to do what they want to do because it's against the international law. I mean, same with what he did in the Congress when he didn’t accept the election results, most people turn their back on him.
Trump is clearly trolling the CIA, because the CIA doesn't like it when presidents say out loud what they do in secret.
Basically Trump is giving the CIA the middle finger in retaliation for the CIA trying to kill him.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Lol, did Trump troll you again?
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
As a thought experiment:
Option A: A billionaire dies and leaves 80 billion to his son, his son has a miserable life producing nothing for society and wasting all the money.
Option B: A government confiscates 80 billion and gives it to 1 million people. 1 million now have a miserable life producing nothing for society and wasting all the money. (much like what happened during Covid, which also helped cause inflation with tons of unearned money in circulation and little production of goods)
Option C: The government confiscates and burns (destroys) all the money, thus increasing the value of money for everyone who contributed to society and everyone who earned their own money.
Option A limits the harm.
Option B maximizes the harm and creates a sense of theft being morally acceptable for society.
Option C is also theft, but actually adds a benefit to all producers in society.
Created:
but I have yet to hear a moral argument against it that makes any sense.
The moral argument is that you should be able to own what you produce, and theft is evil.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
If you seek to win, you will inevitably lose, but if you seek truth, you can only grow.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
The poor need the money now.
They will need it more during war time.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Or you can save it for emergencies and give it to the poor when the russians and chinese invade.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
No, he specifically implied hoarding wealth is evil. Ants are hoarders. Grasshoppers are takers.
Created:
what I'm arguing against is hoarding wealth.
So you want a society of all grasshoppers and no ants, we get it bro.
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
One of the major reasons why USA is so relatively productive is because we reward workers with the freedom to spend their fruits of labor as they see fit.
This is why most Americans oppose European tax rates because it removes that freedom to own the fruits of their labors and spend as they wish. As that freedom is gradually removed, so do the incentives to produce for society. This is the heart and soul of the Laffer curve. If you don't have a choice how to spend your fruits of labor, then you really do not own what you produce.
It means nothing if the workers are forbidden under Socialism to own the fruits of their labor while they collectively own the factories under Communism. It's this particular disconnect that has always made me wonder why Communism and Socialism made such convenient bedfellows when the end result is that nobody really owns anything in the end.
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
I really want to know why some people think saving for emergencies is a moral evil. Didn't we used to teach our kids the Aesop story about the Grasshopper and the Ant?
Maybe I am being unfair, but it seems socialists want to kill all the ants and replace them with grasshoppers...
Created:
THis is strange, because if all it takes to be rich is to think like a rich person, then your children and grandchildren aren't going to learn this lesson that you seem to value.
This often happens, and it follows to apply the eternal adage that a fool and their money are soon parted. We don't have laws that prohibit a person from blowing their life savings on the state lottery, and we shouldn't have laws preventing people from doing the same for their kids using the same reasoning.
Created: