Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
The idea that white people needed to take care of black people was one of the underlying principles of slavery.
You misspelled affirmative action, welfare, and reparations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
The current political fanfiction is that having dark skin and being poor means you can't get an ID, where having white skin and being poor means you can.
Created:
Posted in:
Tearing down the statues is just a physical manifestation of the toxic cancel culture the left has cultivated in their dystopian Marxist university Petri dishes.
50 years from now after the Marxist left loses the next civil war, the normal Americans will erect statues of Al Sharpton, Jussie Smollett, and Bubba Wallace while flying BLM flags to appease the mob and facilitate reconstruction, only to be torn down 100 years from now when the American culture decides it no longer wants or needs to worship statues of controversial race-baiters.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I really haven't seen many testimonials at all about ANY poc explaining how they felt suppressed while trying to vote.
If active voter suppression was so widespread, wouldn't social media be practically littered with the testimonials and "gotcha" videos? Yet there are zero.
The soft bigotry of low expectations of personal agency is a far more likely explanation without the gotcha video evidence.
And the cherry on the top is a low voting rate among poor blacks in cities like Detroit which is 90% run by POC's, from the top down. Exactly how are blacks suppressing the black vote in the Democrat-run cities?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I was also watching some Crowder videos discussing systemic racism, and he brought up a question that neither he nor his guests could address.
Poor whites have been systemically voting at a higher rate than poor blacks for the past 50 years.
I think a lot of that may actually be due to the generational reliance on reparations and welfare. Welfare and reparations are the solutions, instead of self-reliance and self-determination (voting). Welfare is a tangible incentive to check out of personal responsibility, which is a prerequisite to the act of voting.
You could even make the case that policies that encourage generational welfare among blacks disenfranchise the black vote.
Created:
Posted in:
1) The lack of progress in building self-sufficiency since the beginning of the War on Poverty 50 years ago is due in major part to the welfare system itself.
2) By breaking down the habits and norms that lead to self-reliance, welfare generates a pattern of increasing intergenerational dependence.
3) The anti-marriage penalties should be removed from welfare programs, and long-term steps should be taken to rebuild the family in lower-income communities.
Additionally, urban black communities are currently infested with racists who will ostracize anyone in their group for doing well in school as "acting out the white devil" while praising degentrification and economic malaise in favor of skin color hegemony. Social pressure needs to help give the people who want out of the black-skin culture a real opportunity to escape that toxic culture instead of social praises and incentives for the virtuous segregation into black-skinned tribes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Maybe if the Democrats gave the welfare money to black fathers instead of the fatherless children, then the Democrats wouldn't have to worry about all the crime, violence, and rioting in the Urban degentrified ghettos.
But nah, males are toxic, especially Black ones. Who needs a father anyway?
In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
77% of black kids have no father, so there's no check on the violence and no check on the lashing out for the attention of one remaining parent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
Most of those arms Israel had were bought, not given. Palestine had opportunities to purchase weapons from all sorts of anti-west nations, including all the surrounding Arab nations along with Russia.
Palestine was just a broke backwards culture though, so the loser was the one that couldn't scrape up a decent army, as is the case of a lot of losers in war. Yeah, it's so sad and tragic, but there has to be a loser in these wars for wars to end.
Nobody is crying over the backwards Confederate south culture that couldn't scrape up enough money for weapons, and were the losers of war.
Want to have land? Don't suck at war.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
But the point I'm making here is that Palestine would not be the loser.
Now that is a huge stretch considering all the historical wars Palestine lost before the USA cared.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
And yeah it's sad the uyghars are doomed to lose the war with China, along with Tibet, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. It's sad, and maybe morally wrong from an arbitrary perspective. But it's inevitable because there has to be a loser for conflict to end.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
That's what happens when you lose a war. Somebody has to lose a war for it to end.
I mean sure, it's sad that people lose wars, but people have been losing wars since the dawn of man and will continue to lose wars long after you and I are gone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
Many Jews will have to leave settled land back to the Israeli part of the partition.
Yep. Israel probably won't suicide its own existing state. Especially if Palestine and Hamas bring nothing to the table but loud words.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I mean it's no secret Trump is a jew lover, look at his family.
Created:
Posted in:
probably never will have a 2 state peace because Palestine will NEVER abandon the demand of right to return (which is essentially the elimination of the state of Israel.)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgmi
Yeah...seems like there will be more mob violence in the future as the government continues to fail with both parties. It's clear that the Democrats in power in the government wanted the statue removed, but the government in general has become so overburdened with excessive responsibilities that today it's unable to do something so simple as remove a statue, even when the government was 100% willing to do it....yet the public wants the government to have more responsibilities and power? It's a recipe for disaster and anarchy.
I posted that 2 years ago haha.
oh and I also posted this 2 years ago...
Another troubling thing about the removal is that the mob encouraged racist attacks on any white person who happened to stroll by the event. We don't need a revival of skin-based racism in this country after it took decades to reduce the KKK to a handful of basement dwellers unwelcome at any venue. Mob justice rarely ends well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
I would have voted Tulsi to destroy the military-industrial complex and I would have voted for Yang to destroy the systemic tribal class and race segregation of America with UBI, which would have destroyed tribal welfare.
Obviously not electable by Democrats due to opposition to entrenched swampy establishment status quo, but one can dream.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
There's 2 people that got 1% in the Democratic primary that I would have voted over Trump.
Created:
Posted in:
you are right that he is a cheapskate, but you are a forgetting a core part of his history. He gets people to do stuff, but he then refuses to pay them.
Someone is paying Anderson Cooper 50,000 dollars a day, and it sure as hell aint Trump.
Created:
Posted in:
That's not my theory at all.
My theory is that Trump is too much of a cheapskate to outbid his rivals for media hush rights.
He thinks he can compete with the establishment media.
Created:
Posted in:
He pays others and is also paid by others.
Lol..4d chess theories again?
Created:
Posted in:
Maybe because Trump doesn't want to pay Anderson Cooper 50,000 a day in hush money.
Created:
Posted in:
Orangemanbad is a profitable media business model.
Anderson Cooper makes 50,000 dollars a day.
Created:
Posted in:
Yeah, but he doesn't pay fox to do it, and he also doesn't pay the other 90% media hush money either, like all those Hollywood sexual predators did.
Created:
Posted in:
We should just go back to days when honest poliicians paid the media to shitpost for them.
Created:
Keep posting stalker. I'm sure you don't gaf about the COC.
That "For GreyParrot" post is enough to get you banned for stalking if I had the mind to report your infractions.
Created:
-->
@PressF4Respect
Ad-hom trolling. Unlike a typical libtard, I don't cry to the moderators. I just block the troll.
Oro is the only person I have had to block with obvious COC violations including stalking.
Created:
"Most trusted name in news."
-Jeff Zucker
Created:
-->
@PressF4Respect
OMFG you FUCKING OWNED ME KID!
Meanwhile, in the clown libtard world, Doctors in CHOP were instructed to only give Tylenol (tm) to COVID patients as it was the only drug FDA approved for COVID-19.
(plus all the citizens of CHOP were already on non-FDA approved recreational drugs)
Created:
Created:
Created:
Created:
Post your political fanfiction here.
Created:
Posted in:
A CHOPian died. We need a 3-day funeral and some gofundme from Celebrities. Cmon! CHOP CHOP!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
I said it before. Attacking someone's family is a tool of organized crime.
Imagine a world where CPS takes your child away due to your skin-color as a parent because...
"...Clearly I’m more concerned about [your child] than you are."
George Orwell saw this coming.
Created:
Posted in:
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
It's okay, because Cedric put him back on topic.
not one person had condemned or punished him for what he said, when you can attack someone and involve their children in that setting without reprisal that should say a lot about the state of society. they have NO moral authority over President Trump.
interesting how that furthers division and harmony in our society, gotta fire up the riots and looters I guess.
Created:
Posted in:
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PressF4Respect
going on a tangent to a completely unrelated topic.
It's okay, because Cedric put him back on topic.
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PressF4Respect
If I am the ringmaster of misdirection, then you are the entire circus
"Clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
black privilege, imagine anyone of a different hue had said that.
Cedric was morally justified though because Gaetz was most certainly brainwashing that brown-skinned Cuban to behave like a white-skinned man.
Cedric had a moral and civic duty to intervene for the sake of the welfare of the child and to fight white supremacy.
"Clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are.”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
or maybe it wasn't clear but you are too obtuse to further explain yourself, what else did anyone expect you to do?
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
ahhh you're slick, much respect but you really burst my bubble with the direction I was going :(
Yeah, he has become the ringmaster of misdirection. I heard he won an award on Penn and Teller's show.
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
The conversation was about police reform. then Gaetz threw a fit and started crying.
Exactly. Gaetz TOTALLY overreacted to the simple fact every Democrat knows instinctually. That the government is a better parent than you can ever be.
Especially the 77% fatherless black children in Democrat-run urban dystopias.
“Black people in the streets are getting killed and if one of them happens to be your kid, I’m concerned about him too. And clearly I’m more concerned about him than you are,”
-Cedric Richmond
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
my main issue is claiming to care more for his child than he did, obviously you aren't a parent, perhaps ask a parent what kind of reaction they would have.
Some people are raised by wolves, others by a government of Democrats.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Again, it's not a moral attack. It's a clear statement of a fundamental Democrat principle.
That a government of elite oligarchs knows best over a parent, Especially the 77% fatherless black children in Democrat-run urban dystopias.
Cedric did NOTHING "wrong" and Gaetz is overreacting.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PressF4Respect
Cedric Richmond is talking about one thing, and then Matt Gaetz goes off on a tangent and moves the conversation onto a completely different topic, completely sidestepping the issue at hand to demonize Richmond's character in an attempt to discredit his argument. But then again, what else did anyone expect him (and others like him) to do?
I don't think Cedric did anything "morally wrong" by stating a solid Democrat principle. That a government of elite oligarchs knows best over a parent, Especially the 77% fatherless black children in Democrat-run urban dystopias.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I mean the guy literally said he was clearly more concerned for the welfare of Gaetz' child than Gaetz was. That's a solid Democrat ideology. That government controlled by a Democrat oligarchy knows better than a deplorable parent. Especially the 77% fatherless black children in Democrat-run urban dystopias.
Created: