Greyparrot

I'm generally not a big fan of callout videos. They usually end up being strawman infernos.

It is literally infuriating Pacuckman and the idiots that follow him are allowed to exist while being this stupid. In the first instance, he is clearly saying he typically doesn't like to apply naturalistic interpretations to the bible, but in that instance of the Red Sea parting, he would apply someone else's interpretation of a naturalistic argument in that instance... And the second instance this idiot is talking about, Ben Shapiro CLEARLY states he would not attend a celebration of their wedding itself, which he regards as a religious ceremony, but would be fine going out to dinner with them in any other setting which wouldn't be considered a direct religious celebration of their gay wedding in itself. I'm a hardcore Atheist and I can still understand his positions are consistent here. Pacuckman and the low IQ animals that support him should be banned from voting for being this stupid.

Bomb the statues of Oppenheimer as well.

Now I am become Woke, the destroyer of Statues.

This skit alone would have had Carlin roundly and thoroughly crucified on the altar of PC non-comedy.

Trump is doing something about it. Haven't you heard about Trump pulling federal funds from Universities that shut down free speech?

Universities of course having a vested interest in shutting down free speech as it could expose their ponzi scheme.

That was for Dred Pirate. The left has no humor. PC sucked the life out of them. That's why all approved comedy is indoctrination followed by clapter.

George Carlin fortunately died before the left could crucify him.

Basket of deplorables indeed.

Why do you think the Union allowed those statues to be erected in the first place after Sherman bulldozed southern culture in his march to Atlanta?

Sure I did. 

1) People pay to get their children rubber stamped (Varsity blues scandal)... but that's been going on for decades with Alumni support.

2) Affirmative action awards people higher on the intersectionality hierarchy scale. That is textbook arbitrary decision making since science hasn't proved that being a light skinned hetero is a genetically weaker and inferior lifeform on the planet.

3) 500% increase in tuition with declining benefits to marketable job skills. Most Universities have gender studies as a field of expertise. Nuff said.

4) All accreditations are done with other Universities participating in the scam. That is textbook ponzi scheme with the students ultimately paying for the fake accreditations when they find that the 500% tuition debt hasn't translated into a 500% increase in employment opportunities.

All Universities are fake with arbitrary credentials. You would think the current Varsity Blues scandal along with the 500% increase in tuition has exposed that ponzi scheme by now where arbitrary universities race to authenticate each other.

If 2020 isn't a clear referendum on the merits of intersectionality hierarchies...then the left won't win again for decades. By your responses, it may not be, and another scapegoat will be found to explain why the DNC can't win after the 2020 loss (probably males)

In any case, I am sad you missed the joke about the current misandry environment.

All I am saying is that society should proceed with caution when bulldozing history, lest history repeats. Do you want to witness a cultural Civil war in this country where one culture wipes out another culture in your lifetime?

You still missed the joke, because you don't see the misandry problem. I guarantee you that all the males who have zero chance at winning the DNC nomination are extremely aware of it.

Why would you waste time listening to a right comedian? he doesn't say anything that would draw clapter.

His comment was obviously a pushback joke addressing the "shut up you're a patriarchal male" hysteria in today's PC climate, leading to the current crop of garbage DNC candidates that need to persuade independants that the X chromosome and a vagina are superior and sufficient tools for leadership.

How about the ones doing the disenfranchising? I mean take a look at the current crop of authoritarian socialists coming out of the DNC today. You would have thought they had learned their lesson by now about using the state to disenfranchise productive people by now...guess removing history is a sure way to repeat it.

Learn to code.

And Clayton Bigsby.

God forbid that we have statues as a reminder what happens when we blindly believe what people in power tell you to believe.

Most scrutinized president in all of history.

I wonder about the kneejerk media outrage if a politician stated that some of the Muslims are very fine people... oh yeah...

From your link:

Who cares what the politicians say. The reality is that with no action from either party, all these programs are going to go bankrupt. What is your solution? Taxes? We can't balance the current budget with a 100% tax on the rich as it is. Our debt is larger than our entire economy right now.

How about the new one "Trump lied on his tax returns" when Trump has been audited by the IRS every year since he made his first million? 

That one is really a funny conspiracy theory considering what a hardass the IRS generally is at pouring over someone's tax liabilities.

But don't worry, the entire Democrat Congress is better at spotting tax discrepancies than the actual IRS agency responsible for it ...lol.... what a joke of a conspiracy.

Really that "Obama is responsible for the economy" is such a funny one, considering Trump slashed around 1500 regulations Obama had in place. How was Trump such a genius to know which Obama regulations to keep in place to get an averaged 3% gdp growth? Didn't Obama claim that 2% was going to be the new norm for economic success?

Crazy like a fox i guess.

Let's see..what's a more important debunked lie... Trump lying about what he eats, or the DNC lying about the crisis on the border...

Trump lying about the size of his hands...or the DNC lying about how bad the economy is...

Trump lying about how good he looks....or the DNC lying about Trump being a russian agent hacking election machines.

Trump lying about how sexy he is....or the DNC lying about the world ending in 12 years.

People generally know how to prioritize, even if a brainwashed nevertrumper cannot.

I think the public is genuinely becoming nauseated at the nonstop "orangemanbad" endless parade of conspiracy theories pushing such a whacked out narrative.

Russia hasn't really had any effect or global influence on the USA since Reagan. God knows they try, the last best effort was to sucker the USA into a proxy war in Syria (which Trump got us out of)...Russia isn't a threat to the US or Nato now that Trump has gotten EU to bolster their military contributions to NATO.

However, Iran directly supports and finances terror in the Middle East and across the globe in addition to being a nuclear threat (they have the will to use them unlike Russia). Iran supports Hamas, Isis, any jihadist group to take the USA down, as they have been at war with us for 40 years since Jimmy Carter. Trump is the 1st person since Reagan to actually address the real threat.

LOCK IT!

Condoning Iran has far greater direct ramifications to American life than whatever Russia can do to us as a country.

Because to admit Trump did something right is to admit they did something wrong by supporting Hillary.

If the left truly wants to maintain this delusion, they should immediately stop funding the DNC and start sending money to the Kremlin, because after all, it is really Russia that has the power to get an American  president elected, not American political groups.

No amount of conspiracy theories will ever put Hillary in the Whitehouse at this point.

Supporters can't possibly admit Hillary was flawed because it would mean they are somehow flawed as well.

A<C<B.... hack the election!

1C

2A

3No

4Yes

Well one good thing coming out of this is that the Left will never be mistaken for a party of tolerance and civility ever again.

I read an article that the FBI determined that ONE UNSPECIFIED GOVERNMENT COMPUTER in Florida was hacked by Russia. No mention in the Mueller report about which computer or whether the said computer was involved in election tallies. If this is what the rabid left means by "hacking the election" then it's a bunch of ado over nothing. All Florida election officials deny a hacking took place. Mueller never followed up on the FBI claim.

So then there are health benefits for genital mutilation.

Is genital mutilation part of the treatment?

We even anthropomorphize Aliens. Those are as popular as jealous Gods.

Gallup poll collected extensive data in a project called "Who Speaks for Islam?". John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed present data relevant to Islamic views on peace, and more, in their book Who Speaks for Islam? The book reports Gallup poll data from random samples in over 35 countries using Gallup's various research techniques (e.g. pairing male and female interviewers, testing the questions beforehand, communicating with local leaders when approval is necessary, travelling by foot if that is the only way to reach a region, etc.) 
There was a great deal of data. It suggests, firstly, that individuals who dislike America and consider the September 11 attacks to be "perfectly justified" form a statistically distinct group, with much more extreme views. The authors call this 7% of Muslims "Politically Radicalized".They chose that title "because of their radical political orientation" and clarify "we are not saying that all in this group commit acts of violence. However, those with extremist views are a potential source for recruitment or support for terrorist groups." The data also indicates that poverty is not simply to blame for the comparatively radical views of this 7% of Muslims, who tend to be better educated than moderates.
The authors say that, contrary to what the media may indicate, most Muslims believe that the September 11 attacks cannot actually be justified at all. The authors called this 55% of Muslims "Moderates". Included in that category were an additional 12% who said the attacks almost cannot be justified at all (thus 67% of Muslims were classified as Moderates). 26% of Muslims were neither moderates nor radicals, leaving the remaining 7% called "Politically Radicalized". Esposito and Mogahed explain that the labels should not be taken as being perfectly definitive. Because there may be individuals who would generally not be considered radical, although they believe the attacks were justified, or vice versa.

105,000,000= 7% of 1.5 Billion.

That's not just a few nutjobs like the 3000 KKK members in the USA.

Are you referencing Transgenders with genital mutilation?

Nah, we anthropomorphize just about anything we see or hear about. Especially animals. Humans are a ball of hubris.

Jealous Gods are the most popular.

More Islamic terror in Sri Lanka. Wew, religion of peace.

Yep. Every time they put plastic in the recycle bins, it goes straight to the oceans. And they feel great about doing it too.

Feels good to send plastic into the oceans instead of landfills? Sure does.

Thank god Trump was too smart to fall for perjury traps, like Cohen and others.

That's fine as long as the Left makes Cohen the rat rot in prison.

The left will never pardon Cohen either.