Greyparrot

The new wave of indoctrinated democrats from the universities are ready to eat Obama and his legacy.

RIP Obama.

It's a good thing indoctrinated political science hacks don't choose who gets to be president. Might have a Soros puppet in the office.

The same people that are condemning Trump before his term is up are the same people that awarded Obama the nobel prize before he could wage 8 years of war.

700,000 tax dollars to promote a political position to grow the authority of the government. Nobody see anything wrong with this?

State controlled media funded with tax dollars?

erectile

Makes sense. Fat women produce limp males.

That was a funny advertisement.

When I was growing up, it used to be that the Media spoke truth to power.

Now the MSM Media speaks the truth as dictated from government power. Remember the endless coverage of the 17 Government intelligence agencies? There would never have been a single network 20 years ago that would have trusted anything that the government said without rigorous cross checking. In fact, the medias prime position was to distrust anyone in power first and verify everything government claimed. Now the media just "leaks" the government truths from anonymous "sources" as "facts." Even though the media gets all these facts wrong, the people still don't get that the media is now working hand in glove with the government.

I'm pretty sure corporate media has been bought by the same people that purchased the government. This is sad.

So it's not just an American thing that political elites want to thwart the will of the people. America has the impeach Trump movement, and UK has the remainiacs.

The classic brick puncher argument is also used to justify the 70% gender wage gap argument.

Consuming is not the same as investing. If a greedy person can't resist the urge to consume for instant gratification, they do not deserve to be rich.

You are using the classic Marxist brick puncher argument. (also known as mud pie argument)

You are conflating work with productivity. Productivity includes value. Work does not. If you spend 8 hours a day punching bricks, you will not be as productive to society as a teacher working 8 hours.

I am el doggo

Condors are pretty badass. They can frighten off dogs.

not really. the entire service industry is a con job. You pay people to make you feel better.

Capitalism is a system where the more productive are richer than the less productive. Capitalism is also a system that punishes greedy people who cannot delay their instant gratification and people who rack up unsustainable debt. Capitalism rewards people who delay instant gratification in order to invest in themselves and save for the future.

Certainly more nuanced than saying the Cambridge cops acted badly....

I'd be more upset if Trump did not condemn the actual radical supremacist protesters in Charlottesville. I don't really care about his ham-handed attempt at nuance by claiming some of the people there were not racists. He did the same thing with Mexico when he said they were sending their worst over the border, but he also said he assumed some of them were good. Ham handed nuance, not crafty calculated malice.

I agree with you, Trump is horrible with his tactless tweeting, but I guess that has a lot to do with growing up in New York, as most people there are are very rude and blunt.

Yah, but it's not very logical to claim someone incompetent that hasn't shown growth numbers worse than Obama's average (assuming Obama was extremely overcompetant.) That would mean an average competent person would have stayed the course. An incompetent person should have tanked the economy far below 2% growth. By Obama standards of course.

fair enough, although it's not looking too hot with the current 3% average GDP growth. Assuming you are hoping the president fails.

Because by the Obama standard, 2% average GDP growth is showing extreme competence.

Trump would have to have an average GDP far lower than 2% to be deemed incompetent. Certainly nowhere near 3% average GDP growth.

It should be negative, not ranges between 2 % and 4 %

3% average GDP growth doesn't show incompetence. Negative % would. Maybe even 1% average would.

Well there it is. An admission that the economy has nothing to do with the competence of the president.

Not talking about a negative rate of increase. I mean an actual negative rate of GDP growth, which is what you would expect from an incompetent president. You certainly would never expect a 3% increase in GDP from an incompetent president, no matter how many Obama laws and regulations remained untouched. You would expect a negative %.

An incompetent president while slashing over 1500 Obama regulations should at least by blind dumb luck if not incompetence, should have managed to remove the Obama regulations that were improving the GDP. Why isn't the economy tanking under an incompetent president?

I agree, Mueller has been far more professional than Comey. So far.

The economy should be in negative growth if Trump was incompetent. Why is Trump allowing the growth to continue under Obama laws and regulations?

there's 1579 things you can follow up on if you really have the time.

Now answer the question and try to think longer than a minute on the answer.

How are these specific laws allowed to stand where others were completely eviscerated during an incompetent Trump's maniacal purge of Obama's legacy?

Why do you think Mueller is quiet? 

Here is a good video explaining how Pakman is a cheerleader for the left elites.

What exact laws did Trump allow to stand? Even if you can find these elusive laws, my point still stands. If there is no proper leadership in the white house, how are these specific elusive laws allowed to stand where others were completely eviscerated during Trump's maniacal purge of Obama's legacy?

Explain it.

The point is that if it takes a skilled politician to improve the economy, then the economy should be tanking right now under no proper leadership.

If that was true, then the economy should have done way better than it did from 2008-2016.

What looks good on paper doesn't actually translate to real world results.

Do you trust Mueller? Why is he quiet?

I voted for him as the only choice against Hillary.

It's also very interesting to see the effects of completely biased Media outlets like MSNBC and Pakman over the last decade. When the media absolutely refuses to critique their own house, you end up with exponentially increasing incompetence from the DNC in its ability to provide viable candidates and win elections. It's highly likely that the DNC will probably churn out a candidate in 2020 that is worse than Hillary. The DNC is crumbling from all sides as the MSM continues to support the elites in the Democratic party. Meanwhile, the crazy fringes of the party are free to do things like call Biden out...call Pelosi out.... and the media is powerless to stop the left from eating themselves. Whatever chaotic ripples Bernie Sanders threw into the DNC in 2016 will pale in comparison to the bombs AOC and Ilhan Omar and others of the fringe will be throwing at the establishment candidate. Because the biased media was unable to critique Sanders on his policies, they will also be completely unable to critique and reign in the growing radical left of the democrat party. The radical left policy positions are so bad that even the Senate can't go on record as defending things like GreenNewDeal. While the base of the left voters will mostly jump at the chance for a luddite return to a colder planet and medicare for all, it's going to drive the absolutely most important voting group off, the independent voters. Without a proper unbiased media, the Candidates themselves are going to take their talking points from venues like MSNBC and Pakman, and look very appealing to their base while seeming uninformed and out of touch to the independent voter. 

With a media so thoroughly biased, it forces candidates to take extreme positions to win the primary that will never pass muster in a general election. Plummeting ratings for biased media outlets are a sign that they are losing control of the independent vote, and that won't translate to a 2020 win for Democrats.

Response to a non response? Mueller has been completely silent. No collusion.

Well, discounting Mueller's rebuke on Buzzfeed fake news. Mueller has been completely silent.

While we won't know what's in the unredacted full report, we can accurately assume that most of the report will explain the indictments handed down, mostly centering on Flynn, Cohen, and others who had process crimes against the FBI and the IRS. We do know a lot about these indictments, and that there was nothing involving collusion within those indictments as stated by Mueller himself. Yeah there's stuff that was caught by Mueller, but there was no collusion. There was never any collusion. Trump was never that smart to pull that off.

Meanwhile in a DOJ that leaks anything it possibly can, continued silence from Mueller and his team about collusion. You have to either believe they found nothing, or that they did not WANT to find anything.

Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel to be betrayed by Mueller.

lol, how does it feel to be a member of a failed coup?

I just wanna say, if I was gay, I would have to admit BSH has a nice ass.

>=)

lol, how does it feel to be a member of a failed coup?

Why does Brussels know what is best for England?

You nailed serenity. People just need to be honest about the questions you ask.

I mean, that's how OJ got justice...through a civil suit which he lost that then pressured him to go do something dumb like get caught threatening a person with a gun. There's multiple ways the law can get you.

Yeah, so the law discriminates on your geography. If you are in front of the mayo clinic, the baby gets better odds to live. If you are a mother in appalachia, the law screws over a mother by forcing her carry an unviable fetus that can't possibly live outside the womb for 2 weeks from week 20 to week 22 because of where she lives.

Why does the appalachian mother have less rights?

They should be able to win the civil suit, as it doesn't matter if he is guilty or not of the hoax. They only need to prove that he was liable for the hoax.

Because a fetus at 18 weeks can survive if it happens to be in front of the doors of the mayo clinic, and a fetus at 22 weeks can't survive in the Appalachians.