Total posts: 28,020
-->
@FLRW
Yes, Einstein was a hippie, like Trump.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Well he did make a foreign sex worker the First Lady.
Clearly, Trump is the hippie America needs.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
It's literally the quote from the congressional source. You are so lost.
How about googling why CIA's job is misinformation, and weak minds trust the CIA.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
What he lacks is statesmanship
Yes. If only he could start no new wars in a nice way that looks good on tv.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Only if getting the job done means almost causing civil war,
That would only have happened if the bullet landed.
Luckily for most Americans, that job did not get done.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
but when Biden was in the ticket all we ever heard about was how old he is.
How else would you explain the unworkable economic policies and foreign policy disasters? You don't think he actually planned the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle with a clear mind?
Regardless, he vindicated your claim already by resigning the ticket.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Luckily, most trump voters know he isn't smart, but he got the job done.
Faith in humanity restored.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
This was an absolutely surprisingly accurate clip from MSM
This is why people say "don't care, still voting Trump"
And this clip was BEFORE Trump was shot at by his opposition.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
this is just sad. Show me how you "inject" light. cultists will just make any excuse they can for him.
Again, if the world is going to end for you because Trump used a layman's term instead of the medical term "intubate"....
If you were to try and explain:
to someone, you probably would use layman's terms too.
Good luck with your TDS bro.
If you are gonna call Trump a "dummy" for not knowing the difference between the medical term intubation and "injection inside" when he was describing "bringing the light inside the body" ...feel free to mock him for not being a Doctor and using layman's terms.
But he never came anywhere close in this clip to saying he wanted to inject people with bleach. He didn't even say he wanted to intubate people with UV light. He was only asking the doctors to look into it.
You claiming anything remotely close to the lies spread on MSM is the Mandela effect.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
As an example, there are 4 companies (Tyson, Cargill, National Beef and JBS) that control 85% of the US beef market.
How does that stop joe blo from offering a cheaper steak?
Another thing that stifles competition is the corporate ownership of government.
That is the ONLY thing.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Here, I will bold the 2 phrases that describes your "mystery disinfectant" that you feel compelled to fabricate:
"A question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you're totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting: so, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous—whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light—and I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're gonna test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you're gonna test that too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the (UV) disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute—one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside, or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it'd be interesting to check that. So you're gonna have to use medical doctors with it, but it sounds interesting to me, so we'll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that's pretty powerful."
Not only did he say it was uv light twice, but also repeated twice that the light knocks it out in 1 minute.
This isn't even close to being ambiguous. You have to have full blown TDS to misread that clip.
Again: read this:
And if you are gonna call Trump a "dummy" for not knowing the difference between the medical term intubation and "injection inside" when he was describing "bringing the light inside the body" ...feel free to mock him for not being a Doctor and using layman's terms.
But he never came anywhere close in this clip to saying he wanted to inject people with bleach.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
disinfectant (a common one being bleach)
And a not-so common disinfectant is uv light, which the president clarified at the start AND the end of that clip.
Why even stop at bleach though, if you are going to mind-read the president, you should have gone full retard with formaldehyde, since it's pretty common too.
That would be a cool made-up story too.
This is just more of the same gaslighting and mind-reading as the word "bloodbath", even though the full context makes it clear to anyone with even the most rudimentary grasp of the English language.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Maybe that's why Russia rolled into the Donbas in 2022, because Biden was afraid he would go to jail if he threatened Russia.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I know. They had a link to hearsay in that article (which I linked for you) and claimed Trump said it. He didn't say he had a "fascination" with using nuclear weapons. There's no record of him saying it.
Thanks again for spreading CIA disinformation.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Only the CIA can correctly decide what a disinfectant is. And then gaslight millions into thinking Trump said the word "bleach" or clearly meant IN HIS HEAD to say the word "bleach."
Surely it couldn't be UV light as Trump clarified not once, but twice...once at the start and again at the end.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
From your source:
Trump's alleged comments, reported for the first time in a new afterword to a book by New York Times Washington correspondent Michael Schmidt....
No wonder there is no record of Trump ever saying this. Thanks for spreading the CIA disinformation though. Again.
Created:
"A question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you're totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting: so, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous—whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light—and I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're gonna test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you're gonna test that too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the (UV) disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute—one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside, or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it'd be interesting to check that. So you're gonna have to use medical doctors with it, but it sounds interesting to me, so we'll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that's pretty powerful."
word count for "bleach" = zero
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
or I heard him say those words out loud...
Maybe this is the Mandela effect working on your mind as you remember Trump saying the exact word "bleach"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
The "Orangemanbad" narrative, which portrays Donald Trump as a reckless figure potentially capable of launching nuclear weapons without restraint, can significantly impact public perception of nuclear energy. This kind of portrayal heightens fears around anything associated with "nuclear," even though nuclear energy is a peaceful and essential technology for powering the future. When the public conflates nuclear energy with nuclear weapons due to such narratives, it becomes more challenging to build support for expanding nuclear power, which is vital for meeting the growing energy demands, particularly in the context of AI advancements.
Moreover, this narrative can influence policy decisions. If policymakers are swayed by exaggerated fears that Trump or any leader might misuse nuclear technology, they may impose stricter regulations on nuclear energy development. This could slow down the adoption of nuclear energy at a time when it is critically needed to ensure energy security and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The implications extend beyond just energy policy; they affect national security and the U.S.'s ability to remain competitive globally in technological innovations.
Finally, the focus on sensationalized claims about Trump’s potential misuse of nuclear weapons distracts from the real discussions needed to advance nuclear energy. The energy debate should center around the benefits of nuclear power as a clean, reliable energy source and the challenges of safely managing and expanding its use. When the discourse is overshadowed by fear-mongering narratives, it detracts from the critical work of ensuring a sustainable energy future powered by technologies like AI, which will require significant and reliable energy sources that nuclear power can provide.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Yeah, Iran is really worried USA can't have nuclear energy solely due to the fact of Orangemanbad vibes.
During the interview with Elon Musk on X, Donald Trump touched on the importance of nuclear energy, specifically in the context of powering the future of AI. Trump suggested that as AI technology advances and becomes more integrated into various aspects of society, there will be an increasing need for reliable and substantial energy sources. He indicated that nuclear energy must play a critical role in meeting the growing energy demands driven by AI, ensuring that the U.S. remains competitive in the global technological landscape.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
more Orangemanbad vibes.
It's by design that the deep state wants you to waste all your time and energy attacking non-existent strawmans for fear that you will attack the actual real threats.
Created:
-->
@cristo71
- did not have a catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan where no one is held responsible or is fired or resigns and when asked about the debacle, responds “That was four, five days ago!”
- did not have Russia invading a country;
- did not have Iran funding a major terrorist attack against a US ally.
Exactly. We all here know Trump is dumb about a lot of things and we have also said here that Trump was dumb about a lot of things, but his actions were verifiably better than the status quo today.
"Don't care, still voting Trump" is how MAGA really feels, not the strawman caricature the media projects about most of his supporters.
Created:
he never said "bleach"...he never conclusively "thought" bleach.... end of discussion.
Anything else is just vibeing to the Orangemanbad vibes.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
He still thought it was a good idea. Which is really dumb.
This is how you form your opinions? Projecting mind reading into actual spoken words? No wonder the current leaders will never be held accountable for anything they do or say. Only mind reading applies to your tribe. Words and actions are secondary and trivial concerns....
You sound like a CIA spook here, and what's worse, you act like this is normal.
Maga culists DO think donald trump is smart because...
More mind reading. None of us have ether said, much less thought that here. You have been watching so much CIA media, you have learned to think as they do, apparently by your words and assertations here... a plethora of "My Truth" bullshit that casually disregards spoken words and real world actions....
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Seriously, wtf is up with the current fascination of the Marxist left with viewing the CIA as a trusted source? Even old school Russians knew you couldn't trust the deep state police. You feared them.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
On page 4 of the report, it states: 'The statement’s purpose was to delegitimize the New York Post’s reporting about Hunter Biden’s laptop by suggesting it was the product of Russian disinformation, despite the lack of evidence to support this conclusion at the time.'
The report goes on to describe how some of these officials were still active CIA contractors, adding another layer of concern about the politicization of intelligence work. You can find this detailed analysis in the full report here."
Created:
Posted in:
This misinformation and disinformation about what people say is why we can't have nuclear power and instead have to rely on unsustainable Chinese energy.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
You know Trump thought Chloroquine was bleach, don't you?
There's more of that CIA MK-Ultra crap where Democrats believe they can read minds and write minds.
CIA is so shameless these days.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
It's a perfect video for people who don't really like either candidate (the majority of independent voters)
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
why would you continue to claim Trump said "bleach" unless you were in a cult? You literally agreed he never said that, and then proceeded to say he said that.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Also sports. Also putting a person with a bean-counting government level of talent and ability in charge of national innovation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
But Operation Tru-Dat had an additional, more insidious layer: the phrase was specifically engineered to reinforce loyalty among Black voters to the Democratic Party, even when party policies were detrimental to their communities. CIA operatives recognized that while many Black Americans were staunchly loyal to the Democratic Party, there were growing concerns about the impact of certain policies—such as underperforming public schools, mass incarceration, and the influx of illegal immigration that threatened unskilled job opportunities.
As "Tru-Dat" spread, the CIA's analysts observed a subtle but undeniable shift. Black voters, despite facing policies that contributed to failing schools, limited economic opportunities, and job competition from illegal immigrants, remained fiercely loyal to the Democratic Party. The phrase acted as a subconscious reinforcement, making it difficult for many to question or break away from the political status quo, even when their best interests were at stake.
Operation Tru-Dat wasn't just about influencing key Democratic leaders—it was about maintaining a crucial voting bloc for the party by ensuring that Black Americans continued to support it, regardless of the negative impact of certain policies.
In the context of Operation Tru-Dat, Kamala Harris's calculated use of Black vernacular was a deliberate strategy crafted to reinforce the psychological triggers embedded in the "Tru-Dat" phrase. As part of the covert operation, the CIA subtly influenced Harris to adopt a more "down-to-earth" and culturally resonant style of speech when addressing Black audiences. By faking a connection through exaggerated vernacular and references to Black culture, Harris's rhetoric was designed to activate the embedded command in "Tru-Dat," deepening the subconscious loyalty of Black voters to the Democratic Party. This manipulation ensured that even as policies negatively affecting Black communities, such as underfunded schools and job competition from illegal immigration, persisted, the sense of cultural affinity and allegiance fostered by Harris's words would keep voters from questioning or challenging the party's direction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
In the shadowy corridors of Langley, Virginia, deep within the heart of the CIA, there existed a project so clandestine that only a handful of operatives knew of its existence. Codenamed "Operation Tru-Dat," it was a psychological warfare initiative designed to subtly influence political dynamics in the United States. The project's aim? To manipulate the behavior of key political figures and their supporters, ensuring compliance and strategic alignment with certain covert objectives.
The origin of "Tru-Dat" as a trigger phrase dated back to the early 2000s, when CIA behavioral scientists discovered a curious phenomenon: certain phrases, when repeated frequently in specific contexts, could subconsciously influence individuals' decision-making processes. The phrase "Tru-Dat" was chosen for its simplicity and colloquial resonance, especially among demographics that leaned towards progressive politics. It was disarming, friendly, and non-threatening—a perfect candidate for embedding a deeper, hidden command.
The CIA began testing the phrase in small focus groups, carefully monitoring the subjects' reactions. To their astonishment, they found that repeated exposure to "Tru-Dat" in casual conversation could subtly increase the subjects' openness to suggestion and compliance with authority figures, especially when the phrase was used by those they trusted or admired. The success of these early tests led to the decision to deploy "Tru-Dat" on a much larger scale.
To introduce the phrase into the political mainstream, the agency covertly worked with influencers, politicians, and media personalities, encouraging them to incorporate "Tru-Dat" into their rhetoric. The phrase became a viral sensation, popping up in speeches, interviews, and social media posts, all while the public remained blissfully unaware of its true purpose.
As "Tru-Dat" spread, the CIA's analysts observed a subtle but undeniable shift. Key Democrat leaders began to show signs of increased compliance with certain policies and decisions that, under normal circumstances, they might have resisted or questioned more vigorously. It wasn't mind control in the traditional sense—there was no overt compulsion—but the phrase seemed to grease the wheels of the far-left consensus, smoothing over internal conflicts and dissent.
The success of Operation Tru-Dat was not without its challenges. Some operatives within the agency began to question the ethics of using such a tactic, fearing that it could spiral out of control or be discovered. However, the project's handlers reassured them that it was all in the service of national security, and the potential benefits outweighed the risks. It also did not seem to affect Democrat Palestine protesters.
Years later, as "Tru-Dat" became a ubiquitous part of the cultural lexicon, few would suspect its true origins. The phrase had seamlessly integrated into the language, a seemingly innocuous affirmation that, for those in the know, carried a far deeper meaning. And as the political landscape continued to evolve, the effects of Operation Tru-Dat quietly persisted, shaping the course of events in ways that only the most secretive operatives of the CIA could fully comprehend.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
He's also leading with men who grab steering wheels, soldiers who are suckers and losers, men who inject bleach, kids in cages, disabled reporters, and fine KKK on both sides.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Trump just hired Tulsi Gabbard to take on Kamala (again)
Not exactly a smart decision considering Kamala absolutely demolished Tulsi Gabbard on the debate stage... .according to MSM and the CIA
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Thank you. All prices should be zero.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
It's getting really hard to be a CIA shill these days. AMIRITE?
Created:
-->
@FLRW
The panel's recommendation against using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin together for COVID-19 treatment due to concerns about QTc prolongation is understandable, but it overlooks evidence from several studies that suggested HCQ could be beneficial, particularly when used early in the disease’s progression. For instance, a study by Dr. Didier Raoult in France, published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents in March 2020, showed that patients treated with HCQ and azithromycin had significantly lower viral loads compared to those who did not receive the treatment. This early intervention approach suggested that the combination could reduce the severity and duration of the illness when used appropriately.
Further supporting evidence came from a study conducted at Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, which found that hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received HCQ had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to those who did not. Published in International Journal of Infectious Diseases in July 2020, the study reported that 13% of patients treated with HCQ died compared to 26.4% of those who did not receive the drug. Importantly, this study noted that when HCQ was administered early, alongside careful cardiac monitoring, the risks of QTc prolongation were managed effectively, highlighting the potential life-saving benefits of the drug under controlled conditions.
President Trump's comments about HCQ and azithromycin were based on early reports and studies like these, which indicated that the combination might be effective, particularly in early-stage COVID-19 patients. While the concerns about QTc prolongation were valid, the outright rejection of HCQ in many media reports failed to consider these documented positive outcomes. The debate around HCQ illustrates the need for a balanced perspective that recognizes both the potential risks and the documented benefits, rather than dismissing the treatment altogether.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
OMG, are you part of Operation Mockingbird? Maybe you and others work for the CIA?
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Media Reporting and Misrepresentation:
The New York Times, in an article from June 15, 2020, titled "FDA Revokes Emergency Approval of Hydroxychloroquine to Treat Covid-19," highlighted the FDA’s decision to revoke the emergency use authorization (EUA) for HCQ. The report focused on studies that showed no significant benefit of the drug for COVID-19 patients and mentioned potential risks, but it downplayed or ignored studies and anecdotal reports that suggested possible benefits, especially when used early in the course of the disease.
CNN consistently ran stories casting doubt on the efficacy of HCQ. In an article from April 24, 2020, titled "No, these medicines cannot cure coronavirus," CNN dismissed the potential of HCQ by citing studies that had shown no benefit or had been halted due to safety concerns. However, the article largely ignored or minimized studies and reports that suggested HCQ could be effective when used in combination with other drugs, such as azithromycin and zinc, particularly if administered early.
The Washington Post published a piece on May 18, 2020, titled "Study finds hydroxychloroquine didn’t help clear coronavirus, citing more deaths among patients," which referenced a study that showed higher mortality rates among patients treated with HCQ. The article focused on this study without adequately addressing the criticisms of its methodology or acknowledging other research that showed differing results.
The Impact of Selective Reporting
The media’s selective reporting on HCQ created a narrative that the drug was not only ineffective but also dangerous. This narrative was reinforced by sensational headlines and the omission of nuanced discussions about the conditions under which HCQ might be effective.
Several studies later suggested that HCQ, particularly when used early in the disease’s progression or in combination with other treatments, had significant benefits. However, these findings were often underreported or dismissed by the MSM, in part because the drug had become so politicized.
Created:
How the Media Reported It:
The New York Times published an article titled "Trump Muses About Light as Remedy, but Also Disinfectant, Which Is Dangerous" on April 24, 2020. The article highlighted Trump's remarks, suggesting that he proposed using disinfectants internally, which the paper described as dangerous and irresponsible. The story quickly gained traction and spread across social media, amplifying the claim.
CNN ran with a headline that read "Trump ponders dangerous coronavirus treatment: injecting disinfectant" on the same day. The report emphasized Trump's suggestion about disinfectants, warning viewers of the dangers of ingesting or injecting such substances.
The Washington Post published an article titled "Trump asked if disinfectants could be injected to kill coronavirus inside the body. Doctors answered: People will die." This story not only reported Trump's comments but also included quotes from medical professionals warning against the use of disinfectants in this manner, further solidifying the perception that Trump had suggested injecting these substances.
The Spread of the Narrative
These initial reports set the tone for the coverage that followed. Headlines from other major outlets included:
NBC News: "Trump suggests 'injection' of disinfectant to beat coronavirus and 'clean' the lungs"
BBC: "Coronavirus: Outcry after Trump suggests injecting disinfectant as treatment"
The Guardian: "Trump suggests injecting disinfectant to treat coronavirus. Doctors urge people not to listen."
These headlines played a significant role in shaping the public perception that Trump had told Americans to inject themselves with bleach or disinfectant. The initial framing by these outlets led to the widespread belief that Trump had proposed a dangerous and absurd solution to the pandemic.
How the media DID NOT report it:
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Companies reacted to the bleach lie perpetuated by the radical left. Had the MSM chose to not lie, and report the truth as my link shows, there would have been no warnings issued.
Created:
Created:
But I like the way you reword everything in way where you have just a little wiggle room.
The media has the wiggle room as paid liars like the CIA.
GP is a liar
I work for the CIA as confirmed by the resident stolen valor larper in chief.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Thank you. All prices should be zero.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
He asked questions about tracheal uv light and that is how the bleach lie originated
Conclusions: In this first-in-human study, endotracheal narrow-band UVA therapy, under specific and monitored settings, appears to be safe and associated with a reduction in respiratory SARS-CoV-2 viral burden over the treatment period. UVA therapy may provide a novel approach in the fight against COVID-19.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I will reiterate since it seems you glossed over this:
The reason why most people can't accept that Trump is dumb (which he is) is because your side insists he is the dumbest man on the planet. (which he is not)
Media caught crying wolf so many times lose credibility when actual wolves are sighted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Thought you had some ideas about price controls to fight inflation.
Created:
Posted in:
The CIA is full of spooks—people whose professional lives don’t exactly revolve around honesty. It's hard to trust a group that deceives for a living or recruits others to do so, often for reasons that are anything but clear.
The problem gets worse when you consider how often the CIA has been caught deceiving American citizens, reporters, and even the politicians who are supposed to be their bosses. Some of these instances are shockingly well-documented, while others are less so but still pretty convincing.
This makes it tough for many to trust the CIA. Sure, they have access to some of the best information out there, but they don’t always share it. And when they do, it’s often so tangled up with half-truths that it’s hard to know what’s real. Sometimes, they just flat-out lie.
It’s like having a professor who’s a world-renowned expert in their field, someone who knows everything there is to know. But then you find out that this expert (cough, Fauci) is a pathological liar with a hidden agenda, shared only with a select few. The lies might be incredibly convincing, complete with detailed notes, citations, and images—yet all of it as fake as a three-dollar bill.
Created: