Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
lol, you had god knows how many public warnings from the mods and probably countless other warnings in private
Everyone knows you went full Aspergers here and couldn't stop yourself from getting yourself banned, even spergging off to the mods publicly (hilariously)
Created:
Lol, I love how partisanbrained it must be for you to say its Trump lying about the bonespurs and not the doctor that diagnosed it.
That would be way too much to expect from a less than normal person.
Created:
Posted in:
See, you're so based you can’t imagine a delusion like that
I feel bad for dysfunctional people that get themselves banned in weird ways from something so easy to normally participate in.
especially from a site as forgiving as this one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
So Trump will try something crazy and Harris will do something reasonable like sell back land Mexico once claimed.
Created:
Posted in:
Uncontrollable emotions, lol.
The same people who told you Biden is fine, are the same people who now tell you Harris is capable
Created:
Posted in:
I have a lot of extra money, gambling is just for fun, win or lose. It's still money I don't absolutely need. I just happened to win big this year betting on the collapse of the left tribe.
Like this chat site, it's just for fun, and not ever something I would take so seriously as to get myself banned in an uncontrollable emotional outburst. I'm probably going to end up buying my girlfriend a car or something which she probably doesn't need either.
Created:
Posted in:
Happens all the time.
Yes, mental decay to the point where you ban yourself from a chat site.
Happened to Biden too. A travesty.
Created:
Posted in:
Crying is for unstable people who get themselves banned on a chat site.
I was simply explaining why the media are being careful to not let Kamala have the opportunity to answer a question because they know what probably will happen.
Created:
Posted in:
Lol, unstable. Uncontrolled emotions. Maybe you are a disgruntled former bank teller still believing growing your debt exponentially is good.
Did you even touch grass this week at all?
Created:
Posted in:
Nobody mentally unstable enough to get banned from a chat site likely has a job with consequence.
They would have gotten banned from that kind of job at the first uncontrolled outburst.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
Liberals love sucking up to massive banks and megacorporations. They are pawns of the elite.
what's funny is that the corporate oligarchy clearly coopted the skin of Marxism/wokism and somehow pulled it off with the uninformed electorate.
Propaganda machine go brrrrr
ESG was all about jumping that shark for the few left unconvinced.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
The last guy running for president dropped out after answering questions.
"look, we beat medicare"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Exactly. If you know the Titanic is going down, might as well enjoy it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
The machine has all journalists held at gunpoint for fear they will start asking Kamala questions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
17 trillion extra debt over 10 years under Biden and we live like shit
or 24 trillion extra in debt with Trump and we get to party.
I'll go with option B
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Stop shaming AI for debunking your "we can tax our way to prosperity" fantasy lore.
3 trillion/10 is 300 billion...nowhere near enough to cover the yearly deficit of 2 trillion.
Marxist Propaganda may work on idiots, but not on math.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
$3 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade
What a joke, we run 2 trillion dollar deficits yearly. Under Biden, we would have 17 trillion additional debt instead of 20 trillion...... big whoopsie doodly doo.
3 trillion/10 is 300 billion...nowhere near enough to cover the yearly deficit of 2 trillion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
AI debunked this. Stop lying to the AI about taxes and debt.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
His speech writers run in shorts? What a rich Orangeman.
Created:
Posted in:
A top tax rate of 60% on income over 1 million would reduce the deficit and eventually lead to a surplus.
AI debunked this.
It’s highly unlikely that a top tax rate of 60% on income over $1 million alone could possibly generate an extra $2 trillion in revenue. Here’s why:
- Current Revenue from High-Income Tax Brackets: High-income earners already contribute a significant portion of income tax revenue. Even with a 60% rate, the marginally increased revenue generated from the income over $1 million will not be nearly enough to close a $2 trillion deficit. The exact amount of the shortfall depends on the income distribution and the response of high-income earners.
- Diminishing Returns: As tax rates increase, there is a diminishing return on additional revenue. High earners historically have engaged in tax avoidance or evasion, and reduced their income to avoid higher taxes. This could limit the actual revenue generated by a higher tax rate.
- Economic Impact: Higher tax rates will have negative effects on economic growth to some degree, reducing overall tax revenues when high-income earners invest less or work less. This unintended consequence offsets the revenue gains from the higher tax rate.
- Revenue Elasticity: Tax revenues historically are not linearly proportional to tax rates. The response of high-income earners and the economy can cause actual revenue increases to fall way short of projections.
- Devaluation of the dollar: High earners might shift substantial portions of their wealth into cryptocurrency, which could lead to a devaluation of the dollar and undermine efforts to capture that wealth through taxation in American dollars.
In essence, while a higher tax rate on high incomes might increase revenue theoretically, it is unlikely to single-handedly generate an extra $2 trillion. Achieving that level of revenue would require a combination of increased taxes, broadening the tax base, and effective management of tax policy and economic factors. In reality, while increasing the top rate to 60% would likely generate significant additional revenue, it would not come close to covering a $2 trillion deficit. The additional revenue might be in the range of $100 billion to $300 billion, but precise figures would depend on detailed analysis and actual taxpayer responses.
Created:
Posted in:
You’re a free gibber. You are part of the problem. This country has too many free gibbers.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
In fact, we could have a balanced budget, zero debt, taxes on the rich, and still have a massive amount of theft through inflation "paying" for all the free gibs.
Created:
Posted in:
We need to increase taxes on wealthy people (those making over a million per year) corporations, and inheritances to get to a budget surplus and pay off 4 trillion in debt.
AI debunked this, even if we taxed you at 50%, the country would be around 500 billion short with the best tax revenue predictions.
Created:
Posted in:
Like people who fall for the debt trap, you have cultists that fall for the government trap that promises a smaller government if you vote to give them more power.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Yeah, Trump sucks, and it sucks that he will be elected mainly for getting shot at by a crazy person.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Like people who fall for the debt trap, you have cultists that fall for the government trap that promises a smaller government if you vote to give them more power.
The solution to a problem should never be the source of the problem.
According to AI, Homeopathy is generally considered to be debunked by the mainstream scientific and medical community.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Chat GPT says taxing people who make 100k at 50% and taxing everyone below that at 25% is still less tax revenue than the current spending budget (by about a half a trillion).....god help us.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
a 100% tax on billionaires most certainly won't come close to 2 extra trillion dollars. Math simply is not there.
They will have to go after the 100k people for a 90% rate to even come close to adding up to 2 trillion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Assuming everyone is okay with a significant cut in the standard of living, a 50% flat federal tax could eliminate the debt in about 18 years assuming for no additional spending/money printing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Eh, he never created illegal immigration when he was doing tv shows.
If he started younger, he could have really done well with the whole government's game of dig a hole, fill it up, and force you to pay him to have the privilege of watching him do it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Apparently, Trump is learning from expert politicians how to create a problem, then become a hero by solving the problem you created.
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Timpon?
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I say "discipulus the based"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
JUST AWFUL! Kamala Harris BERATES Protesters & Vows to Solve a Problem SHE CAUSED!
Created:
Forgot to add source:
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
This is what happens when people put words in your mouth:
Created:
-->
@FLRW
I'm still confused as to why 100% tax would be a bad idea. Communism can work in the USA.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Another way to contextualize the growth in interest costs: right now, the Treasury pays about $2.4 billion per day, on average, for interest. And unless we change course, that will rise to $4.7 billion per day in 2034.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Trump FORCES Liberal Media To ADMIT Kamala LOOKS SCARED After CALLING HER OUT At Press Conference
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Not to mention equity enforced by government guns.
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
DD: Trump sucks, but not for draft dodging.
IWRA: OMFG you are a "maga moron" and what's more, declare him fit to be president!
DD: Grass, please meet feet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Right after he said "troops are losers, inject bleach, and I grabbed the steering wheel"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Beta Chuds for Reagan.
Created: