By no means I am a theist, and I am playing no devil's advocate: Religion isn't harmful. I am an atheist that believes that religion is good to an extent, just like I am a person who believes in laissez-faire capitalism raised in a socialist nation.
You have been on DDO so you know. Mall just went here to debate like the average DDO user. This site just serves as a filter of the more interested DDO users, and those advertisement bots and those bedsheet trolls will not care less about what this site is.
"People are people that are people and aren't non-people. People, As people, Must do things like people and not do things like non-people. People, As people that are people and not non-people, Must behave like people, Or else, They will be categorized as non-people, Which is not people and therefore is not-not-not-people, Which is non-people. People are people, And people are not non-people. People that are people should be people until they want to be non-people, Which that they should still be people even if they want to be non-people, Which makes them as much like people as possible for the standards of the people."
---anc2006, Debate.org
But that is not separating from the art and the artist. If I peel the banana peel out of the banana then the banana is with the peel, How is that peeling the banana?
You literally pointed out "Single people can be noble, but single people cannot be dogs", which is more straightfoward than my r3 argument. I guess you are the top debater for a reason.
This is his whole logic. the comment below is the whole structure of this whole debate. It will take me at least an hour to add fillers to it because apparently I am the one with insufficient proof.
If a person with no strong religious belief hates another atheist who criticizes not his group, it means probably the latter is comparable to a reproductive organ.
The proof is so abundant that if you search up "news" you get evidence for the PRO side. I openly say this because well... it is just a big fat "ggez".
Using my school's way of speaking: I can present proof that Adolf Hitler is racist.
Pro just needs to present evidence and justify them. Again, I think those are plenty.
I think I agree with Pro. I don't know how Con can even win.
If you are starting this without any video, then you are a hypocrite.
Fine, you must post your argument in a video's manner.
Take down this debate, NOW!
It is boring arguing about stuff that I know too much to not win. I want to have a real buzz of challenge.
By no means I am a theist, and I am playing no devil's advocate: Religion isn't harmful. I am an atheist that believes that religion is good to an extent, just like I am a person who believes in laissez-faire capitalism raised in a socialist nation.
You have been on DDO so you know. Mall just went here to debate like the average DDO user. This site just serves as a filter of the more interested DDO users, and those advertisement bots and those bedsheet trolls will not care less about what this site is.
Mall's average argument is the definition of gish gallop.
It does, though it is different.
We know that physically a tree will make a sound but we don't know there is a God.
"People are people that are people and aren't non-people. People, As people, Must do things like people and not do things like non-people. People, As people that are people and not non-people, Must behave like people, Or else, They will be categorized as non-people, Which is not people and therefore is not-not-not-people, Which is non-people. People are people, And people are not non-people. People that are people should be people until they want to be non-people, Which that they should still be people even if they want to be non-people, Which makes them as much like people as possible for the standards of the people."
---anc2006, Debate.org
But that is not separating from the art and the artist. If I peel the banana peel out of the banana then the banana is with the peel, How is that peeling the banana?
Orange man bad.
No, actually, orange man bad. No satirical irony. Orange man bad.
Why did you switch sides?
You literally pointed out "Single people can be noble, but single people cannot be dogs", which is more straightfoward than my r3 argument. I guess you are the top debater for a reason.
no, seriously though. His argument in response to that is basically "Your reasons are opinions, and no opinions matters".
Oh nvm I thought he was pro
How?
Mr. Supermarket is now starting a new debate because someone else has defeated him using resolution-allowed reasons that he thinks is bare nonsense.
Seldiora really reminds me of User_2006. The "User_2006" is now top 5. I am pretty sure Seldiora can do it too.
wow, seldiora is really winning.
It's just a clump of cells that can autonomously do stuff. How is a cat more valuable?
why not?
so this?
https://zhidao.baidu.com/question/2057750902777520227.html
"I am not convinced even whiteflame can win con side on this one"
We got one who claims to be better than whiteflame.
hold on, this exists
Sounds fun, huh?
Humans being single or all organisms?
Oh, are you using christian points? Christians value marriage.
His fault is that it is being too radical. It is like saying “because the Germans caused the holocaust, nothing they do is ever correct”.
I think he is probably telling us that "Non-theists will have a hard time converting to theism" instead of the actual resolution.
Don't worry. he never forfeits in these days. Though he might type long rants of basically gish gallop...
it doesn't even work lol
shush, don't reveal the obvious! Delete the previous comment.
This is his whole logic. the comment below is the whole structure of this whole debate. It will take me at least an hour to add fillers to it because apparently I am the one with insufficient proof.
If Jewish ppl can write "God" as "G-d", why don't expect you to do similarly?
yes.
I bet $1,000 on Con.
It is more like "is being a draftsman more beneficial to me compared to being an actor"
I hope so.
Me neither, apparently because some cars broke would correlate to that using tools for transportation is harmful:
Interested?
Um...This is a falsism.
If a person with no strong religious belief hates another atheist who criticizes not his group, it means probably the latter is comparable to a reproductive organ.
I praise you for your bravery.
Oh hi, I am known as anc2006 on DDO. This is me here. Welcome to the site!
"Power"?
The proof is so abundant that if you search up "news" you get evidence for the PRO side. I openly say this because well... it is just a big fat "ggez".
Vote
bump comment