"Depends on what you mean by SEXUAL intercourse. I'm referring to the act of penile penetration of the vagina. The only method in doing that act would be the insertion of an organ into another."
Alright, so you think oral sex is never intended? Well, I don't find a purpose or a reason why Oral sex exists, but this argument can also be used for any other entertainment. There is no reason why mobile phone games exist whatsoever according to this logic.
I have met the guy who has argued with you on that question. He is backwardseden and his insults lost conduct. I had tried a lot to make him respectful, but he just can't. I have learned to stay away from him.
And of course, I try. I didn't do the best but at least that is the most I can deliver here.
My brain is tired as hell. I mean, PRO just made me good at arguing something that I have never even thought of. However, I think I am the more adapting one since PRO is the one that is supposed to know a lot of this subject.
It seems like you are pretty experienced and you are probably over 18 years old. I have noticed that you have less pressure writing your arguments compared to me.
Suppose there are two people called Adam Smith(just a common name), then will their names collide and result in a misidentification? Creative names exist for this.
You know what I am, and if you don't, I would probably take only 1-3 hours to draft a single argument, and everything else is either wastage of time of irrelevant useful stuff. There are 7 days in the time that I have, and I won't dedicate even 10% of them to only this discourse.
I honestly expected criticism and I thought this debate will be deleted after criticism appears. However someone accepted this under a day and it brought be happiness.
I mean, I did it because the last one who did something like this was a troll. This time it was an ff’er. Then again. Not doing this again because eventually it will lean towards truism and plagiarism from this one.
I have a feeling CON will win. I mean, North Korea is a pretty bad country overall, but that doesn't mean people there should not be patriotic. If Jeff Goldblum instigated, "The US is not a great country" He'd win with this argument, but for me, his argument here is unrelated.
Again, I have everything ready, but the fact stillborns exist disprove my argument. If I can prove all cases except for those who aren't fully grown people, does that count?
Judging from that PRO is off for 6 days, are you taking advantage of FF, or do you really understand children's cartoons?
The one on the bottom. It prevents me from accidentally voting again.
Can you remove my vote on this one? My past self have already voted on this.
If you truly believe so, then you could k and win because you prove that the bible is false and there might be no sins at all.
Thank y’all for voting
Just realized I made all points tied. Had to delete and redo.
"Depends on what you mean by SEXUAL intercourse. I'm referring to the act of penile penetration of the vagina. The only method in doing that act would be the insertion of an organ into another."
Alright, so you think oral sex is never intended? Well, I don't find a purpose or a reason why Oral sex exists, but this argument can also be used for any other entertainment. There is no reason why mobile phone games exist whatsoever according to this logic.
If I am not mistaken, you are authoritarian right?
I am too lazy to read the debate but are you assuming the bible as a true source?
I have met the guy who has argued with you on that question. He is backwardseden and his insults lost conduct. I had tried a lot to make him respectful, but he just can't. I have learned to stay away from him.
And of course, I try. I didn't do the best but at least that is the most I can deliver here.
Your belief now is similar to mine a few months ago.
My brain is tired as hell. I mean, PRO just made me good at arguing something that I have never even thought of. However, I think I am the more adapting one since PRO is the one that is supposed to know a lot of this subject.
I might disagree, but I am too scared to take this lol.
Final arguments ready in 24 hours. Drafting begins now as I gain new inspiration. What is the new inspiration? I won't tell you guys until it is time.
It seems like you are pretty experienced and you are probably over 18 years old. I have noticed that you have less pressure writing your arguments compared to me.
Thank you for responding.
Suppose there are two people called Adam Smith(just a common name), then will their names collide and result in a misidentification? Creative names exist for this.
No. The falafel is not awful. It is either fawful or it is foul.
Oh, I had to forgot something. So 4 is a belief but 3 isn't.
My first win is so anti-climatic it is absurd.
You know what I am, and if you don't, I would probably take only 1-3 hours to draft a single argument, and everything else is either wastage of time of irrelevant useful stuff. There are 7 days in the time that I have, and I won't dedicate even 10% of them to only this discourse.
I think I need to think about this one. New argument arriving in probably more than 3 days.
nice
Who are you on DDO though? I had found only like one debate on an account named Jeff Goldblum.
It might take 1-6 days for me to evolve an actual argument, so be patient guys.
Look at R1 and I have defined the terms. Conditionally wrong is not fundamentally wrong.
You’re right.
The BoP of this debate rests on PRO right?
So according to your logic? unicorns exist because a 5-year-old girl next door drew it? Does Spiderman exist because of my comic downstairs?
I honestly expected criticism and I thought this debate will be deleted after criticism appears. However someone accepted this under a day and it brought be happiness.
I mean, I did it because the last one who did something like this was a troll. This time it was an ff’er. Then again. Not doing this again because eventually it will lean towards truism and plagiarism from this one.
Are you for PP prior to this debate or you are convinced?
Also, judging from CON's (a lack of)activity, he will most likely FF and give me a win. However, if I'd bring the 2nd argument, I would.
Opinions?
Oh, so no matter how hard he tries(Which he most likely wouldn't), you will still win conduct.
I quit the site and gave you an advantage, but you are still proving that ALM is conditionally wrong? I thought I had given you the definition.
I suggest you make an actual argument in R5, because if CON comes back and makes something extravagant he can still win the argument point.
Unless you are sure that CON will ff.
Oh you are right. I think PRO will have a better chance of winning. The bad does not make the good disappear.
There are lots of one-time debaters where they quickly create one then go away. They constitute 50% of my total win in my old account.
I have a feeling CON will win. I mean, North Korea is a pretty bad country overall, but that doesn't mean people there should not be patriotic. If Jeff Goldblum instigated, "The US is not a great country" He'd win with this argument, but for me, his argument here is unrelated.
I don't know what is up with you recently, but this is not a procession. Neither of us here have processed anything.
Again, I have everything ready, but the fact stillborns exist disprove my argument. If I can prove all cases except for those who aren't fully grown people, does that count?
does improvement upon indoctrination count?
As comical as this is, Fawful is a noun, not an adjective.
BTW this is just user but new.