Total votes: 4
PRO didn't debate. He just made a "point" in R1 that Jesus, Allah, Zeus and Odin were the same and were all used for puppetry and mind control. CON simply cited the differences between each god, their various attributes and how they unto themselves don't equal mythology. PRO forfeited the debate, so CON's arguments went unopposed. Victory to CON.
I had to read CON's argument multiple times to get it and I think he's saying that God (or G.O.D.) and the main big 3 religions are just big conspiracies concocted to oppress, control, and murder people. PRO's argument is that CON's argument is a non sequitur since the vile deeds that CON harps on and on and on about could just as easily be conditions to appease "God" and thus get into heaven. I find CON's argument persuasive to the extent that it questions the flaw in PRO's reasoning. Religion = Evil doesn't get us to the conclusion that it's all a scam. No equal B.O.P. was specified in the description. If there had been, I probably would have made this a tie. As one was never established and PRO presented persuasive grounds to deny CON's case, I vote PRO! To CON, I would recommend to not make one-round debates in the future. Make them at least two so you can actually defend your positions!
https://shrib.com/#MVisEVyqTjwcm6aFvH6l
RFD: https://shrib.com/#Q3RpDXG4Hd7hs0ZfZDQU
Good job to both debaters!