Total votes: 8
Pro successfully refuted Con's arguments with factual information. Con refused to properly refute Pro's counterarguments. In particular, Con failed to address Pro's points regarding Israel's rightful ownership of the land, and the fact that the Jews are not in fact the minority. It does not help that Con chose to skip two rounds, effectively forfeiting them.
FF on both sides.
Pro had something vaguely resembling an argument. Con basically just used Ad Hominem, which is also why I'm giving the conduct point to Pro, even though neither one of them had great conduct.
FF on both sides.
Pro didn't really make an argument, and didn't have any sources. I am also giving Con the conduct point because of Pro's lack of participation and forfeiture.
Pro missed 2/3 of the debate.
Full forfeiture by con.