Total posts: 2
-->
@Proletariat
Marx rhetoric defies human nature.
For Marxism to be successfully applied you need to disregard human complexities there are no individual's we all surrender into an economic brace of equal income. Human attributes like greed or ambition just have to dissipate in order for any success everyone has to abide by strict depressing standards. Which considering the human race is improbable humans cannot be confined to full equality people will also find ways to ensure more monetary power legally or not that is basic phycology that even Marx doesn't consider in his doctrine. that makes the communist manifesto egregious and in honesty a work of fiction something unapplicable to any mass society. I believe Marxism can only work in tiny conglomerates of people so for Marx to even imply inducing his strategy on a mass scale makes him a deluded buffoon.
Created:
-->
@7000series
Hawaii is a US state, and a legitimate one at that. To justify this claim, I will be using master morality, originally proposed by Nietzsche.
That comment about it being legitimate. Hawaii was legitimate before we occupied it had substantial resources and a fair governance even if monarchal in foundation.
Connecting this to the annexation of Hawaii, while the overthrow of the queen was bad, Hawaii is now much better off as part of the Union. As of twenty-twenty-four, Hawaii has a gross domestic product of one-hundred and fifteen billion dollars. Additionally, due to the tourism industry, Hawaii is the happiest state of the Union. This would not be the case if Hawaii was still a monarchy.
(quoting from the description of this topic)
To begin why you are wrong in every way I must deconstruct your faulty narrative of history. To call the excursion on Hawaii a mere annexation is to deter yourself from reality it was by definition a bloodless coup. You justify your claims with biased statistics that Hawaii is the happiest state. The issue with that is Hawaiian natives whose land and culture we scourged during the coup are not happy, The Americans who are the majority are. 90% of Hawaiians are not natives who were afflicted by the unconstitutional invasion of their peaceful country.
By technicality yes Hawaii is a better aspect of our Union but only for the 90% of Americans who inhabit it. I recommend you consider native statistics. You again ignored native considerations when you discuss tourism and how it is what makes Hawaii soo happy when native Hawaiians have been begging for people to stop visiting there for years as many feel exploited by the tourists. They acknowledge the monetary gain but feel humiliated. Your use of Master morality is depressing because you use it as a cloak to disregard the wants of others.
No Hawaii would not have a gross domestic product of one hundred and fifteen billion dollars if they still had a monarch, but they would still have full authority over there home which their ancestors had habited for thousands of years how can you consider that morally just? The Hawaiians were pleased with how they lived with their traditions and denying their autonomy, considering we demolished all of that there is no justification.
All I want you to know is
your only argument is how this benefits America your point is apathetic, and I plead that you acquire some humanity before justifying a tragic event that stunted the culture of thousands.
Also, I would love to see you try to justify the coup the Philippines it had similar motives only difference is having a body count of 200,000 Pilipino citizens.
citations
under demographics is where I received my 90 to 10 ratio.
Created: