I have debated you twice and beaten you twice. Third time? That's so boring. Also your suggestion is irrelevant because I have not stated an opinion. Only facts. It is my opinion, however, that we ought to listen to facts. Maybe you disagree with that and in that case, we can run that debate
"Goof move" is supposed to say good move. I don't really know if I should remove the vote and edit it again just to chnage that mistake because it will notify everyone again
It is not surprising to observe the level of incompetence engrained within the single vote casted for this debate, given knowledge of the individual responsible for its content.
It's just unfortunate to me I suppose. Regardless this guy isn't a good debater in my opinion. Records are misleading and frankly, anyone can win a debate with an equitable resolution. Some of the people ascribed with this perception are simply just bad faith individuals who hardly ever have genuine challenges.
Well, i'm not blaming you or anything, I do understand people have things to do and that's fine, I am just frustrated with the results here because I think it's obvious that I am the rightful winner here.
Well, what can I say? Everyone knows I won this debate. I was robbed by some far left ideologue who clearly made a ridiculous RFD and did not understand the arguments made. The issue with this site isn't debates, it's the voters.
Here is a quote from someone who voted bombed for oromagi previously saying he still would have voted for him even if it was obvious he was losing.
> "I would have voted for oromagi if it looked like he was losing." (FLRW).
Do you think it's not a genuine issue to have someone openly admit he would vote against an individual even if he thought they won, for apparently no reason at all?
Do you know how annoying and it is to have challenged the" top ranked" debater on the platform, clearly and evidently defeated him argumentatively, and still "loose" the debate on record?
Don't know exactly what you are mentioning me for...but given your willingness to extend your argument in respect to the debates conclusion, it appears self evident that this comment holds far from any imperative to you.
It's very funny from a personal standpoint. I would score the debate a draw by virtue of its entertainment. I also don't know how you manage to respond so quickly.
Mall may have won this debate. As this is my new account I do not yet have voting permissions, but I can evaluate that Rational Madman's output was much too low here.
Would it not be better to make use of the quote feature in order to make the rebuttals more clear? It's hard for both readers and voters this way in my opinion.
Okay, so, if one is aware of the feeling of having read something so foolish/idiotic, but is meant to be serious, that is close to my current line of thoughts in respect to the comments section of this debate.
Okay
I have debated you twice and beaten you twice. Third time? That's so boring. Also your suggestion is irrelevant because I have not stated an opinion. Only facts. It is my opinion, however, that we ought to listen to facts. Maybe you disagree with that and in that case, we can run that debate
Its more of a fact then my opinion.
> "Islam does not condone terrorism"
It obviously does, however, I will let someone else have this debate.
"Goof move" is supposed to say good move. I don't really know if I should remove the vote and edit it again just to chnage that mistake because it will notify everyone again
I have voted now obviously. I also want more people to vote
Why didn't anyone vote on this?
I didn't have permissions at the time because this is my new account. This was a annihilation by pro.
It is not surprising to observe the level of incompetence engrained within the single vote casted for this debate, given knowledge of the individual responsible for its content.
Thanks a lot
If either of you have time, maybe one you gentlemen can vote as I only have 4 days left here
This rap battle is fascinating in certain aspects, and I suspect it is going in a direction I was not prepared to fathom
Oh my
I would appreciate any votes for this debate. We only have a week
Oh my
Thanks, it was indeed an interesting engagement
You must be extremely occupied to allow a duration of two weeks for posting arguments
I don't know if that is what he means, but this should not be a hard debate based on this. The resolution is not a debate that exists.
The instigator clearly forfeited, can someone vote on this please?
https://www.debateart.com/debates/3403-atheism-is-simply-a-lack-of-belief
I appreciate you saying that because this vote is just incoherent and poorly constructed.
It's just unfortunate to me I suppose. Regardless this guy isn't a good debater in my opinion. Records are misleading and frankly, anyone can win a debate with an equitable resolution. Some of the people ascribed with this perception are simply just bad faith individuals who hardly ever have genuine challenges.
Well, i'm not blaming you or anything, I do understand people have things to do and that's fine, I am just frustrated with the results here because I think it's obvious that I am the rightful winner here.
Well, what can I say? Everyone knows I won this debate. I was robbed by some far left ideologue who clearly made a ridiculous RFD and did not understand the arguments made. The issue with this site isn't debates, it's the voters.
Here is a quote from someone who voted bombed for oromagi previously saying he still would have voted for him even if it was obvious he was losing.
> "I would have voted for oromagi if it looked like he was losing." (FLRW).
Do you think it's not a genuine issue to have someone openly admit he would vote against an individual even if he thought they won, for apparently no reason at all?
Do you know how annoying and it is to have challenged the" top ranked" debater on the platform, clearly and evidently defeated him argumentatively, and still "loose" the debate on record?
I did not expect such a quick debate given the time for argumentation. As it appears, the debate has ended whilst I was asleep.
I don't believe you just did that
Newer variations of the cosmological argument are inherently stronger.
I suspect your opponent will reveal these reasons to you within his time for argumentation.
Very weak affirmative case.
Okay, well, I was hoping to not have to forfeit, but it's a 5 round debate, so I don't suspect much is lost.
Yeah, fair enough. Thank you for being willing to vote here.
Don't know exactly what you are mentioning me for...but given your willingness to extend your argument in respect to the debates conclusion, it appears self evident that this comment holds far from any imperative to you.
I think you have to write much more then that, but I agree with the general outlook of your vote
It was a concession...
I'll vote when I can
PGA2. 0 put up a good performance in this debate
What's with whiteflame's profile picture? I was confused for a minute
Is this guy a troll?
Thanks for voting, but I would expand on you reasons. Other people like to see why people cast the votes they do
I actually would have voted, however, I don't yet have permission to do so.
Not surprising. As I said 12 days ago, the debste was a forgone conclusion
It's very funny from a personal standpoint. I would score the debate a draw by virtue of its entertainment. I also don't know how you manage to respond so quickly.
As an active user I hope you will consider voting, believing you are the most likely to be available.
Maybe you would be interested in voting based on a shown presence within the comment section.
Because that wasn't the topic? In the same way that the topic isn't "birds are good."
Mall may have won this debate. As this is my new account I do not yet have voting permissions, but I can evaluate that Rational Madman's output was much too low here.
Why did you make the voting period 60 days?
Yeah, I didn't expect such a performance. Very interesting. Very good job to the instigator here.
Would it not be better to make use of the quote feature in order to make the rebuttals more clear? It's hard for both readers and voters this way in my opinion.
Okay, so, if one is aware of the feeling of having read something so foolish/idiotic, but is meant to be serious, that is close to my current line of thoughts in respect to the comments section of this debate.
Why did you made two completely new arguments?