"IAdvocates of idealism argue that the mind shapes and constructs our experience of reality, and that the physical world is ultimately an expression of our mental processes."
Wrong, an idealist can believe the world is essentially the imagination of God, pouring out and still treat the world as an objective reality independent of our subjective experiences.
I probably know more about Laissez-Faire capitalism but I am weak on social democracy. Though currently researching this topic from what the advocates of social democracy state, it is very similar to what we already have in the United States, and I have learned the founders of it consider it a form of government they want to put in place to transition into communism
bruh not only is none of that a rebuttal for anything sowell has said but he acknowledges that systematic racism exists. (Depending on what definition you use)
I feel like you have read critiques of portions of his works, without actually taking the time to read and engage with what he says.
The definition of peaceful could disqualify just about any group of people as not peaceful. Nobody is "Free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder."
I'll be damned. An equal voice as long as I can keep the chat informal. I wonder how long I can keep sharing inappropriate memes. Is it sustainable? I guess we'll find out
RM is trying to circumvent his ban on reporting frivolous stuff by tagging you guys when he wants to report frivolous stuff. I suggest removing his ability to tag you guys
Police testimony is treated like evidence in the court of law. Me personally I was a juror and viewed them as skeptically as anyone else, particularly since they held the interrogation in a room without cameras and refused to do any gun powder residue testing, but I think most jurors are not like me and will actually obey jury instructions
I only gave the debate some sort of half assed read and just saw one thing that sparked my attention when reading it. I am in no place to judge and the topic is not that interesting to me
You did have me worried you would miss your round. Me being on a phone for whatever reason means I can only read like 75% of your arguments at the moment so can't wait to read them fully
I thought tragedy of the commons was one of the more common arguments against Laissez Faire capitalism. How was it unexpected?
It is too bad. I really was curious about how his rebuttals would look
Yeah I was just kidding. The scoring of debates is not a part of the portion of the COC that was just voted on
You did well in the limited time you had my stupid jokes aside. It was fun to read
How do you define homophobia?
Computer models who have dealt with this problem agree that you punish for every bad behavior but also forgive.
AI models that forgive do worse than ones ones who don't but AI models that punish and then forgive do the best an game theory scenarios.
English is not his native language. Hopefully whoever accepts this will steal man his arguments and debate him fairly.
You guys really are going to beat me and lxam to the finish line here. That was unexpected
The majority of the BOP should be on pro here. Not the person arguing the negative.
I can still wim this
I should have known it would be legal in Texas.
I believe in Seattle it is legal. I saw that one RLSH do it in front of a cop.
Just glad I could make you happy
I can criticize capitalism all day boys. Heil Stalin
Thank you
Just some evidence you are strawmanning idealists
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective_idealism
Objectivism might be the intended debate
"IAdvocates of idealism argue that the mind shapes and constructs our experience of reality, and that the physical world is ultimately an expression of our mental processes."
Wrong, an idealist can believe the world is essentially the imagination of God, pouring out and still treat the world as an objective reality independent of our subjective experiences.
Bobby fisher actually invented Chess 2. He called it chess960 though
It's easier than googling stuff. You do have to verify the accuracy before you hit publish though
I probably know more about Laissez-Faire capitalism but I am weak on social democracy. Though currently researching this topic from what the advocates of social democracy state, it is very similar to what we already have in the United States, and I have learned the founders of it consider it a form of government they want to put in place to transition into communism
It does favor me. I thought Lancelot was confused about which side was pro
Maybe but it's literally what the word means and is the most common one
bruh not only is none of that a rebuttal for anything sowell has said but he acknowledges that systematic racism exists. (Depending on what definition you use)
I feel like you have read critiques of portions of his works, without actually taking the time to read and engage with what he says.
The definition of peaceful could disqualify just about any group of people as not peaceful. Nobody is "Free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder."
Sneako is literally a cuck. A maybe watched one of his videos and found that out and noped the fuck out
I figured
I'll be damned. An equal voice as long as I can keep the chat informal. I wonder how long I can keep sharing inappropriate memes. Is it sustainable? I guess we'll find out
Can you respond to RM's accusation you don't respect me
RM is trying to circumvent his ban on reporting frivolous stuff by tagging you guys when he wants to report frivolous stuff. I suggest removing his ability to tag you guys
Police testimony is treated like evidence in the court of law. Me personally I was a juror and viewed them as skeptically as anyone else, particularly since they held the interrogation in a room without cameras and refused to do any gun powder residue testing, but I think most jurors are not like me and will actually obey jury instructions
I am the highest authority. The decision is final unless a jury trial is requested.
After reviewing the decision, I find it to be in line with the voting standards of the site. The decision is upheld.
I am also evaluating the vote to see if a veto of their decisions is in order. I will be back with you soon
I actually have the second round argument written out. It's been a rough week though
I am con on this, but I can't be the only one right?
did you miss a word or did I understand you correctly that Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah?
I only gave the debate some sort of half assed read and just saw one thing that sparked my attention when reading it. I am in no place to judge and the topic is not that interesting to me
The meaning is clear and that mistake won't impact the debate.
You did have me worried you would miss your round. Me being on a phone for whatever reason means I can only read like 75% of your arguments at the moment so can't wait to read them fully
the use of the word current in the title. Why not just cut the word current out?
The inventor of the hate based diet is a sleezebag. Try again
I literally told him to vote for you and you are still dumb enough to think I am recruiting voters
Do you mind joining this to be a witness to the hate based diet community I am creating https://discord.gg/NwVWeemV
Also anyone else is invited to join if you want hate based diet advice, I will be charging for memberships after that link expires, so join now
I just ordered a pizza bro. I was hoping it would take longer to get somebody to accept because I need to follow my own plan to prove it works
Because I knew it would get under your skin 😂
Pro keeps winning spelling and grammar points even though in The title of the debate he spells ham with no less than 5 M's.
And spells the following word in the description
"csjkhfrhjuwydusdtgsyegdeyut"
Anyone going to defend the weight loss benefits of not being racist?
I conceded so just say "pro conceded" and vote
This looks like a fun read unless whiteflame takes it too seriously.
Do me a favor and arrange them in whatever style is easiest to defeat. If nested than carry on