RationalMadman

I recommend you to read what I just quoted from ADoL's post in this thread.

Wylted may have been onto something.

Yes they do.

It's sad people still talk about this goofball, just let him be a nobody trashbag that accidentally got let into the white house because overall that's what he was.

Which rule did I break

Do you understand the reasoning behind affirmative action?

I have reported you for derailing a thread in a direction that does not make any sense at all. It is not even a tangent, you straight up derailed.

Did you even read the context of what you just pulled out of the CoC? It meant impersonation and only one person has been resopnsible for impersonating me via my profile pic recently. If GreyParrot were to say he's RM on top of using the image and keep the lie going, that would be a usage for that rule, in the context of:

How can somebody accusing somebody of criminal acts be constituting impersonating them?

I'm not being a dickhead nitpicker here, I have every fucking reason to nitpick, your tyranny found its way to me in 2020 September and believe me I will never forget how you stabbed me in the back, nor David. You will get no mercy from me when and if I am the rightful moderator of this website. I paid attention to every single rule at all times, careful to obey and still I got banned for 2 FUCKING MONTHS over jack shit and double jeopardy abuse despite amnesty promises for asking somebody if they consented to partial doxxing due to their face being on a video elsewhere that I would need to use to show some context (the user is Ramshutu if you are confused what I am referring to).

I do not think it is acceptable how you wield the rules wildly as you fancy. I do agree with Wylted being permanently banned from the website, he doesn't contribute anything positive to the community and several negative things to it. Even when signing up to a tournament, what he did was make a really ridiculous Nazi-based clickbait resolution and forfeit it in the end. He may think he is doing good there with the clickbait, he may believe he was doing good with wanting to dox ADOL but what you need to do is decide for yourself if he obeyed or did not obey the rules.

That is moderation, that is why you had to bite the bullet and not permaban him yet again because when it comes to Wylted, you guys tiptoe like cucks around rightfully permanently banning the guy for continual, intentional abuse of rules, he gets off on it. Whereas if it wasn't for one of the biggest dickheads on the website, Lunatic and the absolute biggest one, Mikal, defending my right to be a dick to them, you'd have banned me for 6 months for being annoying. You have serious issues with comprehending your role as a moderator or what the rules are.

This is also why I am cautious in my approach here as I do not want to fight Whiteflame, he is less of a favoritist mod than you were (despite thinking you favoured me, you ended up doing the polar opposite). He is not a fascist like Ilikepie5 states but there is a serious issue with Airmax, whiteflame's old mentor and friend being his power-balancing position holder, you're not fooling me that's for sure.

Airmax is nowhere near ideal in terms of moderating fairly. He has not got the slightest clue how to moderate, he is good for getting a site popular and that's all I gave a shit about when endorsing him for President's seat.

I know, first hand, personally and possibly and the single best user in DDO's entire history to speak on the matter as I have seen all sides to Airmax, I promise you. All sides, him and I chatted on hangouts and had a couple deep chats as amicable people. I know all sides to him and can tell you this man is not fit for putting justice above friendship, it's his fatal flaw and leads to a nasty streak where enemies of his friends get treated like dirt and his friends get perpetually forgiven.

I will not deny that some very extreme progressives go as far as to say 'white people don't have problems at all and racism and segregation doesn't ever happen towards them' but I want to very specifically ask you something...

White people in America (since you are making it specific to white-majority nations and America is a well-known one with heated issues) who are not too poor and also not very disabled or harmed in terms of mental health, gender and/or other criterion need to worry in particular about which issue?

I am trying to think of an issue affecting white people in America that would be solved by change in legal policy, which doesn't affect essentially all other demographic groups and targets all white people the same overall... I am honestly struggling to come up with one.

Whiteflame and Airmax go way, way back.

Having a president this tight with the chief mod is suicidal usage of the balancing power to the moderators.

Airmax and Whiteflame were tight-knit af back in DDO's heyday. Whiteflame was the chief voting moderator whenever nobody else was willing and able/active to be. He was schooled by Airmax on how to moderate and learned from Airmax how to approach moderation.

There would barely ever be a scenario where Whiteflame and Airmax would clash. This is why the only reason to vote Airmax into president's seat was for the popularity factor he promised, and 'activity boom'.

No, they absolutely did not. Thett3 didn't have shit to do with Airmax's ticket. Mikal and Luna are both closer to being VP than Thett is, by far.

If you are going to shit on an Eastern European nation for cowardice in this war look no further than Belarus.

Belarus eagerly joined Russia until 2-3 days into the war when they realised Putin was going to keep using Belarusian infantry as frontliners, regardless of their training or experience. 

Belarus has been the number 2 (after Russia) trafficking centre for humans, almost as high for drugs trafficking, ever since such trades became a thing in Eastern Europe and Belarus existed.

What precisely could the Hungarians have done? How certain are you that the opposition party were not just as corrupt?

You are calling all Hungarians cowards but 47% did not vote for him out of those that voted.

Thett3 announced himself as VP joining a meme-vote that TheHammer and Mikal got going during the voting stage (Hammer wanted Thett3 to be his own meme VP originally).

If Airmax were to step down or if Wylted had been President, the President could not genuinely appoint a VP to take their place even if they wanted to, there would need to be a MEEP for that to occur, laying out the written premise that the elected President can undemocratically appoint position(s) VP and other such ones.

It is important to note that Wylted promising you VP was a guaranteed lie from the start. He never could appoint you, you were not part of the elected package.

It's a 2-term limit, the wording in the document says that you can't have been President for more than 1 term when applying to be a nominee. Not that you can't be for more than 1.

social* expression

Sex is the physical.

You tell me, this is precisely what happened to me with regards to Seldiora and Mikal except there I really didn't break rules at all. The mods on almost all websites are essentially a frat (or sorority, to remain gender-neutral), I learned how to stay on a neutral side to them instead of being a thorn in their side, it's how you last.

That said, it's never a smart move to compare things to Nazi Germany for the sake of hyperbole, it's tasteless. Wylted/Incel-Chud's threat to ADOL was also fascistic.

The only wise move you made in the nominations was temporarily endorsing me.

You stepping down for Wylted was the least wise move but to each their own.

I am what I say I am and I do what I say I do. Airmax is as snakey and shady as you are starting to realise he is. I hope you campaign and act wiser next election, I know that I will but I also would prefer a Luna presidency over either a Mikal or Max presidency so we'll see.

Bernie actually is a centrist on a fair few matters, even economically (but least so economically).

He is not a Socialist, he is a social democrat.

Analyse his take on almost all social matters, as opposed to economic, and the centrism and chameleon nature that every mainstream politician has become known for starts to shine through.

I think the brainless sheep tend(s) to make threads based on other people's content and use only profile pics that others came up with.

It sure would be a festering wound for the Wylted support base, had he won.

Okay, so why did you say cheating

Quite the candidate we had going. I wonder how the site president he dropped put to endorse is going to help.

This is not really calling out the user, I am curious what all his endorsers would say to defend their choice.

He said he is for freedom of speech and used threats of doxxing and direct defamation to pressure a user into silence.

Idgaf if this thread gets locked or not. I want to say this.

I speculate that you have an image of Putin in your bedroom, on the ceiling.

You would enjoy Wylted's newfound Buddhist ideals.

That said, many Eastern philosophies encourage that approach. The labelling of ourselves is mostly only useful for artificially presenting our strengths and weaknesses on a resume or dating profile, as well as in psychiatry. In the end everybody is at least 50% exaggerating or toning down their real self in their job application and general dating profile's description of themselves.

They originally searched for Nemo but it was Shemo that revealed herself.

What you did with my dam question is literally debating for Pro and acting like Pro said it.

What exactly did you base your 'sources' and 'conduct' allocation on? One source I used on solar panels? That's it?

American society has varied demographics within it. It would be a disservice to democracy to discourage certain demographics to be informed which issues particularly affect them.

I'm not the one advocating for the 'solution' (eye for an eye) that you are finding problems with. Your thinking is so simplistic, I am frankly tired of it.

You just sent me a question if I chose my profile pic or greyparrot did. At this point, you are either consistently trolling or consistently unintelligent.

I do not care which it is, I gain nothing from engaging you at this point.

Imagine having absolutely zero originality within your brain to the point where you need to use somebody else's profile pic to maintain your sense of identity on an online forum.

debate is in voting period now.

Why dud you fake quote me in your second quote?

Oh so now it is specific to child victims?

An eye for an eye for a rapist would be to rape them, not kill them.

Fix your rules or I promise you I will eventually reach a limit where Ichange my image to your profile pics until you admit it is not okay.

If you then ban me for imitating mods, you are blimd to see me being imitated beforehand.

That using profile pictures to harass or imitate another user comes under personal harassment.

I have now had two different users do this to me during my time here, actually three but Novice having a Russia flag is not really important to count.

What sounds like hogwash is everything he says between those questions. He yells something then mumbles some nonsense and leads to the next while shouting it.

I do not need to answer his questions, he has to. It is like he does not realise what News is meant to be.

What the fuck are you using my profile pic for? Get inspiration elsewhere or is mimicking me your only way to have a sense of identity here?

Pathetic.

Second time you've done it, this time literally mimicking it.

People are acting like Will vs Chris is new age sensitivity at play but I actually see it as a remnant of the 'chat shit get hit' masculine ethos of a time passed.

Will Smith grew up jaded because his father abused his mother and he couldn't stop him. What happened is not new age sensitivity gone wrong, it is oldschool discipline methods scarring a man that was raised under it pre-GenX.

Questions are not points, they can help make points but they are not points. Furthermore, he presents himself as a reporter but he isn't, he's a preacher.

He is preaching what he believes (or is told to believe). He is not reporting on events objectively and analysing the facts, he is instead passionately expressing his feelings on a matter and giving wishy-washy rhetorical points.

Putin needs many idiots, in fact Russian intelligence coined the phrase 'useful idiot' as a concept of psychological warfare where people such as yourself would destroy your nation(s) from within by unwittingly pushing Russian Propaganda and agenda, believing you were fixing the system. It also has another context with speicfic individuals who are naive in their security practises.

Eye for an eye... I think you got the wrong idea how to implement that on a rapist and a wrong idea about life if you think you've 'cracked the secret' to justice that was the most primitive way of implementing justice ever invented.

So, do you just type things and hope they come out alright?

I sometimes do that myself but rarely when I'm calling out someone's irrationality.

For instance, you didn't address a single thing I said about Pfizer and Moderna blackballing nations in their negotiations.

RB is a real celebrity, been with the elites, married Katy Perry, divorced her did many movies with the elites serving their subliminal messaging agenda and completely participated in the Illuminati's scheme of highly shallow, nihilistic movies to take our minds off of serious matters.

I don't have an issue with entertainment, I don't 'hate' the elite I just know what they are and what the Hollywood part of their agenda is. So, why is this guy suddenly a wishywashy far-left far-right defender of liberty all at once? Sounds like hogwash when he talks, it's just controlled opposition made to make his side seem irrational and ridiculous if you ask me.

I can see his hand signs many times in his videos and it's very intentional. What he says is extremely similar to how Trump talks, he begins talking about something then quietly babbles during a trajectory and goes loud again on the new avenue always trying to spark a 'OH YEAH FUCK THOSE ELITES' vibe.

I am starting to believe that RB is just controlled opposition. Some of the stuff he says is so ridiculous and he keeps making illuminati hand signs at specific points in his videos clearly intentionally as he knows what they are.

Feeling's mutual

The quote you replied to just highlighted how religion serves the believer and how atheism fails to (in the poster's opinion).

That guy is usually drunk when using this website, it's best to ignore him.

In your shoes, I'd just go 'yeah I was disgustingly OP and this was bastard modding' but to each their own. You didn't play well but it's true your fakeclaim was good since Lunatic had given scum the themesplit without Town's knowledge (despite telling otherwise) and this let you pick a role that would be in the middle of the themesplit.

I agree with you that given how unlosable your position was, whiteflame taking the lynch over you was smart play and a good team move.