Total posts: 19,931
Everyone can see your pattern by reviewing the threads you've made and posts you've made across your accounts.
This is one of the first threads you've made on your Mesmer account that isn't with a Fascist agenda so I really don't see what proof you want. Can you find me threads you've made that aren't fascist, racist, far-right etc?
That said, this technocratic 'utopia' is in fact the dystopia that The Matrix and Terminator movie franchises excellently explore (as well as others).
You've made threads like 'IQ is a valid metric' when if we analyse your other accounts and the way you carry yourself in the thread is blatantly a veiled way to lead into racism regarding IQ tests and the races and implying therefore there's a superior one.
You instantly regard any who dare to oppose you regularly as 'anti-white' you even have unironically used the term 'black supremacist' while saying 'white supremacist' is a racist term to use. It is almost laughable what you are doing, except you are serious and that is what is scary. You really think you can run around spreading your racist vitriol and then even go 'but it's not racist' because you don't hate a certain ethnicity or race, you just see them as inferior. You aren't 'not racist' just because you are not claiming to overtly hate a race, you are still racist because it includes both the dehumanising and pushing for a race as inferior (such as to justify enslaving them in the past) as well as being racially hateful on the other side of it.
You don't say 'the term science is stupid because chemistry is within it' and equally you shouldn't say 'the term racism is stupid because racial hatred is within it'. It's a significant subset of racism.
Created:
Posted in:
Apologies hold more weight after time and consistent effort has proven the previous depiction of the person as no longer fitting who they are.
Prove to us you are now 'saner' and the 'insane moments' will indeed then be able to be apologised for.
It is why I personally don't understand the idea of discipline for adolescents and youth where we make them say 'sorry' after they did something wrong immediately following the punishment. This is creating a person who understand how to avoid punishment in the future, not who understand what being sorry actually is meant to be.
Be 'sorry' within yourself but don't hope for people to really believe it until you've proven with your actions that you've changed. I understand why saying sorry matters, just giving you a tip within yourself that both can help make guilt a healthy emotion and help your apologies be fruitful exercises.
For instance, say 'I'm sorry about how I used to be that way' if it ever happens to come up after a while of you changing your ways. That kind of apology actually holds weight, some will never accept your apology though and that's just life. It's also why I resent being famous if I were ever offered to be it. The world of fame is unforgiving as hell, every mistake becomes 'who you really are' and all the good moments are considered you being fake. Avoid fame.
Created:
-->
@Barney
@Vader
@MisterChris
when you're ready to stop your slumber, let me know btw
Created:
Much like you, all Fascists began by portraying their opposition as the tyrants, if you accept that as an 'either way around I'd do that, whether I was Fascist or a freedom-concerned person' aspect then I can show you how you absolutely align with Fascism and follow every pattern of Fascist propaganda in the past through to as recently as Trump.
The Colonisers of African nations, India etc (primarily the British and French but of course others) who were partially Fascist, used 'divide and conquer' strategies too, they focused on finding the second-most-in-power tribe or ethnicity within a country and empowering them while tearing down the current powerful ones. What full-on Fascists did different was they worked extremely hard at saying they weren't for that kind of control while being entirely for it, since there is a unique advantage in politics when you are the tyrannical coloniser of your own land positioning as a 'defender', it is extremely cunning and something that Hitler's propaganda really was the epitome of but he was neither the first nor the best, just the most blatant.
It starts with easy-to-demonise groups that can easily be framed as both powerful and drains on the 'hard worker' but unlike any left-wing socialism 'national socialism' merely uses that as a facade to then become the greater oppressor of both the poor and the otherwise-would-be succeeders in the more meritocratic culture there previously.
The strategy works like this:
- Constantly, repetitively, make the other side seem as evil for a certain ethnicity or 'group' that is a minority that happens to be something that is taboo to demonise and which it is known many quietly resent.
- Once you have achieved the angle that you're pro-free-speech and pro-quiet-majority, ensure to provoke the opposition, twisting absolutely everything they do and say to fit your portrayal of them. If, for instance, the Jews are rich, you need to make sure every way they flex their wealth to defend against your anti-semitism is itself fuel for your Fascist agenda rather than what it really is; them outplaying your attack on them defensively using what is at their disposal. Every single time they call you evil, point out how they demonise you and then proceed to instantly demonise them. Every time they correctly, accurately destroy you with facts, exposing your past and real agenda, you must simultaneously mix this duality of demonising them worse and using their very means to justify how much worse they are, do not defensively address anything they expose about you, dismiss it as communist disinformation.
- Once in charge, begin to rapidly create a concept of 'fake news' and 'evil media' so that when you censor exactly as you protested against on your rise, you can avoid needing to yourself do it, the people themselves will enforce the start of pressure and push against such media. Eventually, you will of course need to censor but by that time only your supporters will be the ones with voices and media left to speak for them, making it convenient to do it without a single yelp of hypocrisy and tyranny on your part.
- Alongside this, begin to move on from your original 'demon group' (in Hiter's case it was Jews) and begin to demonise the disabled, elderly who didn't retire rich enough to self-sustain entirely independently but not just them, that's not enough to make you seem as a leader pushing for strength, you need to notice what people see as weak, whether it's homosexuality or being deformed despite not being particularly disabled and prey on their hatred because that rage and spite is what will keep you able to remain in power, if you lose at any point revert to the demonising, perhaps saying 'rigged' and incite violent protests in your favour until those in power are forced to flex their power defensively and again can be demonised.
This hasn't been word-for-word written before, it's my original writing on it here on this website, but something like it has since the core ideas are already exposed and written by many experts on Fascism, including those that noticed the parallels in where Trump was heading from day one through to the bitter end where he really upped the ante.
You are a Far-Right fascist that I can see from a mile away for what you are. Whether others see it or not isn't really my issue, I can point out how your experimentation from your Zarroette account through to analgesic.spectre, mgtowdemon and mesmer on this website alone follows a pattern of experimenting of how to refine your Fascist propaganda to make it a combination of digestible and yet full of enough emotional fuel to really get a cult-like following going (not necessarily here, you're going to use your refinement on other platforms potentially), however the effort involved with that isn't really worth it for me just to prove to you what you are doing. I'll let the other readers here use those usernames to notice start-to-end what you've done and unfortunately for you, your 'real beliefs' leaked on mgtowdemon which you assumed nobody would catch but I did and everyone except the 2 mods (who are too inactive or preoccupied at the moment to properly converse with me about it) that I have PM'd about it sees it clear as day.
Created:
-->
@Wylted
This is indeed wrong and eventually when it comes to be the AI illuminati vs the human resistance, I will side with the humans (but I won't be around to do that, it will come at least a few generations away from now) but until humanity is at war with cyborganisms, Mesmer and their school of thought should at least stick to this idea rather than fascism which they're posting in their other threads.
There is validity to the claims of inefficiency in humans but what the fuck does it matter if we are inefficient? That's what comes with being human, if joy and sex as well as nice food and drink are inefficient, I wouldn't want to be totally efficient at all.
The real transhumanist endgame, which benefits humanity, is with us as the leaders and end-users and the robots as the slaves. The moment you try and make them surpass us as the leaders and users, the war will commence (or if it doesn't we will automatically lose as the AI will surpass us in raw efficiency).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
A magician never tells ;)
but yeah, the reverse search was the obvious strategy if someone didn't know.
I really like vampire and werewolf type things but this particular game seems to be a genre that wouldn't entirely be for me (as in the game seems to be a story more than a game and that isn't my typical go-to genre in gaming).
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
You don't have middle easterners having this, "Never forget" mentality.
Ironically, this part couldn't be further from the truth. That said, your original point is somewhat correct for the wrong reasons.
The deaths caused in the middle east weren't 'revenge' for 9/11, that understanding is not at all a direct or even indirect way to interpret things. In fact, 9/11 (whether inside job or not) was one of a series of attacks that succeeded it (terrorist acts) resulting from a vicious rage at how US had promised Al Qaeda and the Taliban that they'd help them and then betrayed them (both were assisted heavily by the US to hurt the USSR and other communist regimes, Al Qaeda wasn't just funded it was begun by the CIA wheras the Taliban already existed but was funded by them).
Both of these had a lot of fury to the US and UK alike (but more so to the US) because it was the US who had directly promised them the loyalty and rewards later on and what happened once the Cold War ended was they helped the Saudi government catch and tame Al Qaeda by snitching a lot to them, they tried the same with the Taliban but Pakistan's government was not as cooperative or happy about it and the Taliban was also more powerful relatively vs the Pakistani military.
This betrayal to both is why the fury was there already.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
In UK the minimum wage is slightly higher and cost of living is lower for the poor than in US (free healthcare for starters) so in UK entry level jobs really are close to minimum wage if they're blue collar. Just clarifying for context, in the US it's less livable by far due to everything relatively costing more (I really mean everything).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Just to be clear, that's just the start of my issues with One Piece.
I think the mechanics of fighting in One Piece are so utterly outrageously nonsensical that plot armour is basically able to be stretched (ironic, given what Luffy's power is) to unjustifiable proportions in order to guide the storyline where they want it to go in any 'showdown'.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Naruto and Bleach show good and evil in almost all characters.
Even a literal Fascist like Danzo is shown to be an antivillain as opposed to pure villain, even Nagato. Perhaps the only 'true evil' in those series are the likes of Zetsu and Aizen (if you don't think Zetsu is evil, you haven't watched enough so I won't spoil).
Created:
Posted in:
- Naruto
- Bleach
- many other animes
- One Piece (hideous animation style and overly simplistic dynamics (villains are 'evil' and heroes are 'good' etc)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
You are a real 'old head' huh, I don't dislike the old school, I just don't overly love it. I prefer the more melodic beats and slicker flow of modern rap.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I am primarily tactical, so I agree with you. I am weaker at overall strategy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Not at all.
For instance one of the paramount juxtapositions of your stance is whether or not to snitch on an ally who has done something unjust.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
It definitely depends on the circumstances. These are equally impressive, exactly equally so in fact.
10-1 is initially superior to 5-0 and 5-0 is initially superior to 10-3
but 10-2 vs 5-0 is that fine line in the 'sand' where that team may have realistically been equal to the 5-0.
The reason is that a 5-0 team starts to be studied and challenged by more informed opponents who know their strats, the 10-2 team already has begun to be studied and exploited.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgmi
I think you posted that reply to the wrong thread.
Created:
Posted in:
Loyalty, Justice, Mercy
Rank these three and justify the ranking in the importance, morally, in a situation for you most of the time.
Created:
Posted in:
Most other nations tax their poor so that they pay their fair share
No they don't. Most nations are either hyper-capitalist hells for the poor because barely any tax is paid and therefore barely anything is publicly funded (zero welfare etc) or they are developed nations with progressive taxation that is gentlest on the poor.
The US is in fact the single harshest nation when it comes to how much it taxes the poor. Not saying this makes the poor in it suffer more than the 'hyper-capitalist hells' I am merely noticing a falsehood.
Created:
Posted in:
I never called you Hitler, you're more of a Mussolini.
Created:
Posted in:
Since you don't mind simply pasting links as your proof, I'll paste links on it.
Created:
Posted in:
If a system is much harsher on your demographic for being involved with drugs, your demographic ends up more likely to lie about having any involvement with said drugs. That's pretty simple.
Created:
Not taking the bait, just pointing out to anyone else reading that the 'tail doesn't wag the dog' should clearly, blatantly apply to the quality of education and teacher-training (with handling unruly students and techniques of rewarding good behaviour and punishing malicious behaviour within a school) being the dog and the students being the tail.
Created:
I say this without any cynicism, you have a point in this thread. I wish to see more of this content from you as opposed to the far-right stuff.
Created:
lack of quality schooling.
existing schools and Teacher unions need more power and money funded with taxes
Not only is it true the schools do but if you support the education disparity needing to be fixed, there is more that has to be provided for the very poor, a 'few dollars' is a medium purchase the poorest, this seems unthinkable to the more well-off.
A calculator is expensive to them, you need to understand that absolutely everything is costly for them (let alone a laptop to be able to do anything technical-based from home which really caused issues during Covid).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgmi
This is the system Germany currently uses (other nations near to it and elsewhere use very similar but Germany's system is pretty much what is described here, what they do is subsidise the insurance and regulate its policies to be government-approved). It is also what the Democrat candidates other than Bernie supported as their model this time around in the elections. Biden said he'd support this (this is in fact what medicaid under Obama was trying to move towards).
In fact 'Obamacare' in the original plan before it was heavily protested against, was in fact absolutely this.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
NF is one of the single best rappers (even more so than Shady/Em) at encapsulating rage, sadness and agony of people who have a kind of unhappy past that most don't care to hear about. There is a pain solely attached to the fact nobody cares and thinks we had the same happy childhood they had (or even happy adulthood).
Created:
There's levels to the gaslighting and trolling going on here, the mods at the moment can't even perceive the first layer though. So,my advice to all the sane and decent members is to stop interacting with the troll in the arena she/he is baiting you into. Make your own thread, with your own context on a subject that allows you to interact 'around' trolls of any kind.
It's up to you what you feed with your posts and attention, the more 'genuinely' you engage the troll, the more fuel the troll has to twist words within and use against you. The less seriously you take this type of troll, the easier it becomes.
Me posting this will fuel the troll to do anything to wind me up, they may twist words, may warp past events or even state something true that they predict will trigger me a lot more than others think I am entitled to act angry in reaction to, then if I do react with the rage I play into the hands of the troll to play the victim with me as the perpetrator.
Know what you are dealing with, stop feeding it. You are not 'debating' you are just fuelling a far-right troll to rile you up. There's no intellectual discourse going to take place here, even Thett3 is getting baited and he is on the troll's side.
It's not the fuel that's the issue, it's the continued fuel afterwards. Post a response if you want and leave it at that. Go for stern as opposed to angry. If you keep properly engaging this user as if they give the slightest damn what you think and feel, you will end up coninually antagonised.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
What do you guys think of Beach
Assuming that you mean 'Bleach', I think it starts off great and gets very weird and side-story heavy so much so that after the Bount Arc is finished the series is in such deep chaos that the starting of the actual storyline with the Espada seems like just another side-story/filler.
The artwork is fantastic and the story itself is great for sure but I just feel the order of the storyline was a bit iffy (yes, literally things that happened before and after other things could have been structured differently, it wasn't entirely chronological once the fillers came in). I also think that it tried too hard to have so many massive twists, rather than focusing on finessing some twists and mainly being straightforward. There end up being so many twists that it's somewhat confusing who really is a good guy (again this starts happening shortly after the Bount Arc ends, everything about the series gets really chaotic around then).
Until the Bount Arc and even during it, you felt clear on who stood where (despite a massive twist with Aizen). Slowly after that Arc ends, you begin realising that the entire storyline is far more complex than you'd imagined and a lot of the 'bad guys' had simply come to see soul reapers and quincy as the villains, which further complicates who to root for and why.
The series also is so utterly huge that it becomes daunting for you as a viewer to feel you are watching for hours just to progress for a tiny bit of storyline. I do appreciate the effort put in and all the actors and even directors did a great-effort job. This is just about execution of a project and the mysteries of art. Something about the execution felt 'off' for me. The 'natural flow' of a storyline felt absent.
Created:
Just as with the other one it ends up reaching a point where either I accept it as a chore or pay to cover my relaxation (neither is desirable).So, ironically, I can see the flaws with it that Mesmer mentioned earlier. It doesn't fit very well into anyone who has a busy lifestyle and who then doesn't want to spend much on a game.The core issue is that games like this require consistent effort and dedication from the player. This, of course, is by design and makes it a very stimulating pastime, except that when you factor in how many hours are in every day, how much energy you have and the emotions of real life vs even the game (yes, it gets emotionally intense, it's a social clan game with drama and rivalries) it amounts to a grind, where the grit required is something that acts against the pleasure from the game. There is no pleasure from spending money on a game in itself, the pleasure if from the progress but if you constantly feel like the progress is requiring you to either work your ass off in the game or in real life to pay, it amounts to the game not being a game, it's a chore. Thus defeating the reason you played the game in the first place (to have fun as you let off steam from your chores).I do see the appeal of these games and could even see ways each could be refined and/or improved but ultimately it doesn't matter how you design a real-time strategy game that is based around clans and building, either it becomes a chore or it becomes a bore... I know it rhymes but that is indicative of the irony of it all.Eventually, of course, it becomes both but at that stage you feel so invested into it all that you don't want to quit and let all your time, effort and actual money go to waste.This doesn't make me at all say that I see particularly how this type of game is worse than any particular game franchise that is pay-to-play, since this is actually free to pay and all payments are your choice but I do see the problem with the structure of it, you end up trapped and don't know a way out. It may take your phone breaking (but then you have emulator, however it will still factor in) or something along those lines for you to start to see the issue.I happen to be someone who both can get 'addicted' to these games and yet can remain resolute with how much I spend etc (I guess it's upbringing that plays into this though, since I was always raised to understand what any cost really means and stuff) so I don't personally notice the 'predatory' aspect of these games as too brutal or harsh and don't see these companies as particularly immoral, compared to any sort of 'pay us to get pleasure' service. However, I can somewhat see the issue given the social elements of the game (you're in a clan etc) and how it keeps you stuck, afraid to wither away and lose all your progress. It doesn't matter how mentally disciplined you are, the quitting feels horrible at worst or dull/numbing at best. I would say that one thing that could improve these game types is if there were 'levels' and I don't mean newer servers because that's already there and is fair enough. There could be 'levels' to the servers and you move up or slide down the servers based on your progress, this would be far, far fairer and superior even helping you with matchmaking for the clan wars. The reason they don't do this, which is justifiable, is that this would also force you out of your clan and make you stuck in a whole new server, interacting with all new poeple who are just as powerful or even slightly more powerful than yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sum1hugme
Just as with the other one it ends up reaching a point where either I accept it as a chore or pay to cover my relaxation (neither is desirable).
So, ironically, I can see the flaws with it that Mesmer mentioned earlier. It doesn't fit very well into anyone who has a busy lifestyle and who then doesn't want to spend much on a game.
The core issue is that games like this require consistent effort and dedication from the player. This, of course, is by design and makes it a very stimulating pastime, except that when you factor in how many hours are in every day, how much energy you have and the emotions of real life vs even the game (yes, it gets emotionally intense, it's a social clan game with drama and rivalries) it amounts to a grind, where the grit required is something that acts against the pleasure from the game. There is no pleasure from spending money on a game in itself, the pleasure if from the progress but if you constantly feel like the progress is requiring you to either work your ass off in the game or in real life to pay, it amounts to the game not being a game, it's a chore. Thus defeating the reason you played the game in the first place (to have fun as you let off steam from your chores).
I do see the appeal of these games and could even see ways each could be refined and/or improved but ultimately it doesn't matter how you design a real-time strategy game that is based around clans and building, either it becomes a chore or it becomes a bore... I know it rhymes but that is indicative of the irony of it all.
Eventually, of course, it becomes both but at that stage you feel so invested into it all that you don't want to quit and let all your time, effort and actual money go to waste.
This doesn't make me at all say that I see particularly how this type of game is worse than any particular game franchise that is pay-to-play, since this is actually free to pay and all payments are your choice but I do see the problem with the structure of it, you end up trapped and don't know a way out. It may take your phone breaking (but then you have emulator, however it will still factor in) or something along those lines for you to start to see the issue.
I happen to be someone who both can get 'addicted' to these games and yet can remain resolute with how much I spend etc (I guess it's upbringing that plays into this though, since I was always raised to understand what any cost really means and stuff) so I don't personally notice the 'predatory' aspect of these games as too brutal or harsh and don't see these companies as particularly immoral, compared to any sort of 'pay us to get pleasure' service. However, I can somewhat see the issue given the social elements of the game (you're in a clan etc) and how it keeps you stuck, afraid to wither away and lose all your progress. It doesn't matter how mentally disciplined you are, the quitting feels horrible at worst or dull/numbing at best. I would say that one thing that could improve these game types is if there were 'levels' and I don't mean newer servers because that's already there and is fair enough. There could be 'levels' to the servers and you move up or slide down the servers based on your progress, this would be far, far fairer and superior even helping you with matchmaking for the clan wars. The reason they don't do this, which is justifiable, is that this would also force you out of your clan and make you stuck in a whole new server, interacting with all new poeple who are just as powerful or even slightly more powerful than yourself.
Created:
Your reply to me was simply ad hominem fallacy... Hypocrite?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
He said 'the word God' he did not say god. You don't understand context and have ignored his entire life before that quote, much like you ignore everything leading towards an intelligent designer simply because diseases and encephalitis exist. How do you know that the designer didn't want pain and natural selection?
If reality weren't intelligently designed, it would be extremely (99.9999...%) probable that we'd have things disappearing and reapparing rapidly, chaos everywhere, a green leaf becoming a brown hamster just like that, for instance, there'd be absolutely no viability for laws of physics, biology and chemistry to consistently be maintained... Yet they are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
That's also what anyone with Jewoshs heritage thought pre-Hitler, what anyone with ties to the Tsar and capitalism thought pre-Lenin, so on amd so forth.
You don't know who is seeing it or what their agenda is. Crime is the excuse, the reality pf what rhey surveil and can use the information for is much more sinister. They could be making a virtual projection of yoyr personality and lifestyle tendencies, strategising how to place you in their society and use you. We don't know what theseassive corporations are using our information for.
At the very least, they use it to stratify adverts towards you and manipulate you as a consumer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Well, I don't really care what you think tbph.
You're just another atheist who feels their absence of belief in a deity gives them an advantage, while deistic believers have a similar advantage without having the disadvantage of both total lack of purpose and total obscurity at the core of our reality-comprehension.
If you are curious, I explained a few times months ago about what I think happened and is at the core of reality. Basically a random variable (true or not-true for each possible aspect) generator runs at all times and used to randomly determine all things about reality/realities (it has only one of itself, but can/could run multiple realities at once of course all within the true overarching reality of itself as that thing is the only real thing that always has been and will be).
At some point, it reached a slight glitch/paradox ('at some point' because according to me, time isn't contained inside reality, even this ultimate thing runs along time, not outside the time continuum). The paradoxical glitch is that it set 'is true' to a conscious entity's ability to control the random variable generator.
At that point, you can imagine just how much could change. I predict the first thing this entity picked was 'is true' to 'knows everything' for itself. That would give it total control instantly.
The reason for entropy still occuring at the quantum level is that I presume the god (not the generator but the conscious deity persona) became bored with everything being too predictable and left some variables random. That's basically as far as I've gotten and reckon it's as far as I'll ever get into the 'how' of my theology. The rest is more 'what' and 'why'.
Created:
You're debunking ideas that very few on the left uphold. If anything it's right-wing libertarians that tend to run the 'race isn't real' Kritik, in order to dodge the benefits and validity of BLM and what they've pushed for.
Also your debunking is just URLs
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Why not? You do understand what context is yes? In this later quote he refers to the word as in when others generally use it.
Do you only judge someone by their beliefs later or does a younger self and predominant amount of lifespan not amount to anything?
Unlike you, I factored in his whole life and all quotes. If you do that, it is far more probable that the term 'God' as most Theists used it back then had grown to irritate him especially as it was becoming a tool to silence physicists (as it had always been) and he wasn't a Christian (and was a secular Jew, ethnically) he was a deistic type of agnostic.
Created:
-->
@Wylted
Can you name me a single right-wing society/nation that isn't rampant with appeal to authority for any conflict of ideas within it? I can think of many left-leaning progressive nations that have less so than any right-wing society you can name but all human societies have this flaw due to what authority entails (in a genuine sense not just abusive sense).
There's good reasons, not only corrupt reasons, why we trust information and claims made by those with greater authority in a field than those with very little.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Or that those in line with the second group spend 8 years in prison or die from cancer
I pointed out a major flaw, considering that my views are closest to Einstein's on your list in terms of god.
Einstein believed that a god is probably real and is simply unconcerned with morality, explaining why bad things can happen to good people and covering a significant flaw in the popular version of God being particularly benevolent.
He found that certain sheer randomness at the core of reality (quantum level) vs the total lack of chaos on the bigger scheme of things (general laws of physics such as Newton's which are false at the quantum level) implied that there is an intelligent entity defying entropy's randomness to keep certain things constant for reality to be functioning as it is.
He didn't say this all in one direct quote, it is implied that this is how he reached god being real and deistic based on all his findings and quotes combined.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
1. Those that align with Albert Einstein and Stephen HawkingFLRW, Sum1hugme, zedvictor4, Double_R, Bones2. Those that align with Jim Bakker and Tammy FayeEtrnlVw, Tarik, Polytheist, 949havoc, RationalMadman3. Dunnooromagi, DeadFire27
If you're gonna make such a comparison, perhaps what we could instead say is that those in line with the average sociopath are in the first group, those that are in line with the average do-gooder are in the second group and those that are in line with the average scientist are actually in the latter group.
Albert Einstein wasn't an atheist, he was a Deist, much like myself. However, I'm not here to flex that.
Created:
Posted in:
Ramshutu has done absolutely nothing for the site for two years at least. He only returned for this election most likely.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
That is literally fake news as in fraud, that paper should be sued and pay compensation to all European governments for the disinformation.
Read what it says and consider how utterly corrupt it is.
"Long waiting times" clearly will kill less people than not being able to afford to wait at all and dying on the street not even attending the hospital.
So, unless I'm missing something, which I'm not, that already was a brutal fraudulent way to prove the title true from the get-go. After that, I noticed it completely missed out noticing that with free checkups and free treatments, the poor are far more willing to go and get things diagnosed, such as cancer or cholesterol issues and therefore literally save decades of their life by changing lifestyles or undergoing chemo etc.
While high-level chemo at times isn't free because anything above the minimal level is covered under private sector, as is most of dentistry in these nations, the poor end up left with more money for such procedures due to progressive taxation having taken less from their income, proportionally.
All of this put together ends up with a huge benefit to the poor and their lifespans in said nations, as well as the lower middle class.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgmi
This would only work with luxury mansions, in general the mass-estate property moguls actually out-trade their competitor because they sell lower for the same property quality and location than their rivals. They can afford to do this because not everything rests on the profit of one property at any particular time for them.
What you are saying is truer for luxury mansions but clearly the poor can't afford them regardless.
Created:
Posted in:
I am very busy this month, it can't happen for me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Your sarcasm is pretty useless in this thread.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
He's 'good' but not 'great' so I agree with you in terms of I would not call him the GOAT in rap, he's also a Trump supporter who suddenly ditched Trump and ran for president as an independent when it suited his agenda... He's done a rap with Lil Pump when it suited his agenda also.
I don't respect him, of all the women to go for, he goes for a Kardashian. I can't say it's right or wrong but all his life decisions seem based on whatever gets him to headlines ASAP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Closest to 2, number 3 is a separate entity to this god of mine, it made the god and my god hijacked it.
Created: