RationalMadman

Wylted, see a therapist please. Preferably not a racist one.

It is very good to see that no one can deny it.

this is literally DOSing the DART server:

I honestly believe that if you are an anarchist you need mental health assistance. This is not at all mocking them, I promise you this because at some point in my life I was one.

If you honestly want to abolish all government, have unfettered freedom and absolutely no money or capitalist means of strategising society, you have reached a stage of severe delusion and depression. You are so utterly furious and on top of that ignorant of what's going on around you, that you think it will ever be viable to have that. 

If you believe in anarchy as an end-goal (not just a polarity that you lean towards) you need to seek mental assistance from a professional before it's too late. I will like anyone, anarchist or not, to defend against this.

I support making it a 14 day ban instead of 30.

I only sign with that condition. He did do wrong and did obstruct justice and must be made an example of to a degree. He barely uses the website for months and comes back to do that, he deserves a 2 week ban nothing more, for the sake of deterrence of others doing what he did more than accurate retribution in and of itself.

I support making it a 14 day ban instead of 30.

Injustice does madden me, that is not an incorrect presumption to have about me.

I asked for Bsh1, Virtuoso and Oromagi to write my HoF entry. The one who wrote it is clearly the best member of the website and proves the work ethic and attitude of the other two didn't deserve to make the cut. Virtuoso is the greatest member of this website on par with me and that's a fucking fact.

Yet even after that it's still unlocked.

lmao

rofl

lol

Only Islam and Christianity have Hell. They are both sexist religions.

The problem is that Hell doesn't exist. It's a sexist religion's concept of how they punish the evil, therefore it is inherently designed to prefer a masculine type of follower. It's also why monks were historically 'respected' and revered as authoritative in their communities while nuns are seen to 'serve' the community.

I am curious.

Same with Sir and Lord. I was merely using your metaphor against you, like you pathetically scramble to do with every profile pic I choose.

Your metaphor implied I was the one with the power to declare you a Sir and Lord, I used it against you by saying therefore I'm your King.

You can call me King, I don't mind.

Both of you are wrong. Voting late is strategically optimal from a defensive perspective. It's why Ramshutu ensured to be one of the last voters both times. I went for an offensive strategy as I realised I had the hugest lead and knew which forum threads and my own username that I wanted to get in so I had no reason to stall.

If I had waited until the 12th post to even vote and been disallowed to talk about anyone being voted in the HoF, I would have been unable to expose anything or even defend myself. It is not corrupt what they did, if anything you are trying to corrupt this against the mods for no reason at all.

Sycophants and sheep mentality is what happened with people going 'hee hee let's vote wylted, tyrone and coal who have all done next to nothing for the website and two of which are racist, homophobic bullies!'

You are a not a Sir to me, Ramshutu, if anything I have a title here that's actually earned, unlike you.

Supa, did it ever occur to you that the reason that all active and decent members of this website stay the fuck away from your Discord server is that it's moderated by bullies for bullies?

Also what he had as a sig was 'unbanthecuntman' for quite some time. Maybe that was ShabShoral on his/her/their DDO account (which has another name).

And he and ShabShoral were sure to mock me and join in taunting me the moment I actually interacted with them.

You also don't understand how much sarcasm is laced into a lot of what Hammer and Thett ever say in favour of me.

He would not sign this for me and I know he will stay banned regardless so I will just sit and laugh at this as he would to me.

He has not been active at all. His only active phase was being a severe hassle to the mods and starting shit for reason. The most he's ever done for the site is play mafia games and host DnD.

Ramshutu is one of the most belligerent bullies of the site. His taste in mods is bound to be wrong. The rest have no reason to want drafter unless there is indeed collusion at play.

What the actual fuck has drafter done to qualify?

Doesn't matter. DDO Elite chose to appoint him.

Agree = Aye

Disagree = Nay

Android thwarts Apple in every single category, including Camera quality depending which model you get.

If the website was properly configured for Android keyboards, there'd be a lot less typos.

I see literally nothing here that I didnt already know. Hammer kidded around and got absolutely overpunished for a fucking joke, forced to give a screenshot to "prove innocence" he decided to fake one in an obvious way, what kind of idiot asks for a screenshot to prove innocence? He didnt plot to get me in HoF, it was a fucking joke. Get over yourself bsh1, you're not some well-respected supreme arbiter of justice here, you're just the one Mike gave undue power to. Wylted, spacetime and even Vaarka, were all directly doing what suited their drama-inducing agenda. That's why they pitted Virt against Supa many, many hours (over a whole day)after Wylted began campaigning for it. They were sandwiching Virt against Supa with Mike kept safe to give Ramshutu the chance to get revenge with an overturn of his Virt vote. Supa getting in instead didn't matter to them, they just wanted fireworks to go off.

The fact you think REF was referring to a snitch shows ignorance of his humour or ties to the situation. The Tekashi69 image shown referred to Hammer snitching on himself with a completely exaggerated semi-lie, like Tekashi did in his raps, that somewhat resembled the truth but had a lot different (like me being their target to get into HoF). It referred to if he had said nothing or not dared make a bold joke or exaggeration about what he did, nothing would have gone down (this is not entirely the case for Tekashi69 but whatever, the resemblance was via that).

Warren. Only. I would give her the floor and sit in awe.

That is not sarcasm, she's genuinely the best thing in American politics I've seen in a long time.

That is what I am saying. He took a meme that already exists and forced it and it paid off.

Wylted, they are playing you. Quit while you're ahead. Coal is being sarcastic, Castin is being even more sarcastic and Thett is always perfectly ambiguous as to whether or not he is being completely sardonic or actually serious as fuck. You are not going to get to investigate anything and that's fine, we are not all in their inner circle. Just accept it and play the game.

he forced a meme, eat your hat.

I am the most qualified expert on the DDO Elite. From Victim to their greatest rival, I have come a long way in my time with them.

I will list you the absolute members, partial members and blind members.

Apex Godfather: Coal AKA YYW

Intermittent Godfather: Thett3

Underboss: Airmax1227 (probably Mike) (rivalling Bench, who has lost ambitions since and parted ways with the group)

The rest has shifted a lot throughout the times.

There is no one true Consigliere anymore, it used to be Ore_Ele but he's an ex-member (would be Partial upon return).

REF is one of the only remaining 'non-partial but non-absolute members' who is somewhat influential but answers solidly to those 3, the rest have gone extinct.

TheHammer AKA SeventhProfessor

spacetime AKA Romanii

ShabShoral (he/she hasn't outed his/her other account on DDO here so won't say)

Mikal, Kitty, Vaarka and a bunch of others... the Hangouts crew. Whiteflame is potentially this but is more so a blind member.

bsh1 (complex chain-of-event game theory prodding and manipulation)

Wylted (via slanting him into the opposite of where they really want him to go, they know he's oppositional)

Bench (jumped ship from absolute to this)

Warren42 (via Vaarka)

Supadudz (via Vaarka primarily but others too)

That is all for now.

There is more to them, how they pick enemies, enemies that pick them out etc.

Made this topic a year ago: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/524/the-irrefutable-actual-difference-between-the-genders-and-their-brains

Men want to be admired, women want to be desired but there is more to it.

I understand I was mistaking a result of a fundamental difference as instead a fundamental thing they seek.

I believe the truer, or at least other, fundamental difference that explains nearly every single difference between the genders is that when men feel something, they want you to feel it too. When men think something, they want you to think it too. When women feel something, they either want to feel it or don't, they stop there and handle it from that point on as internally as possible (though usually use external stimuli more so than men, even though they internalise the coping far more). When women think something, they only want to share it if it will help shift their feelings to be what they want.

You can go ahead and discredit this as uneducated, sexist bullshit. It took many years of careful observation, piecing together people like puzzles and finding 0 (yes, 0) exceptions to this fundamental law of the genders and their brains. However, this DOES agree with transgenderism. People who truly have feminine behaviour and brains despite being born XY, do actually fit my description of the fundamentals of women and the opposite is also true for XX with very masculine mind and behaviour.

This at first seems to run completely opposite even to what people think about the genders. When women cry, they just want you to cry with them too right? Wrong. This is something I learned that helped me handle them very effectively in life. Women want someone to make them feel welcome, desired and that whatever the woman feels is fine to feel and respected by the other, it's that simple. People wonder why women dig the badboys over the nice guys, it's because the nice guys break to pieces when they cry, and though they may find that therapeutic at first; they want someone who is reliably happy and stable emotionally for them to continually cry to and get cheered up by, they want you to also help them know when they're too optimistic and happy... Yet, they want you to do that at the right time in the right way so you don't kill their high dead in its tracks.

On the other hand, you will find that when you try this with males it makes them unhappy without fail. When you try and soothe and cheer up a guy, it doesn't matter how 'nice' he is unless he's very, very feminine for his biological sex. He will want you to be as angry as him or leave him the fuck alone. He will want you to be as happy as he is or fuck off, because you're killing his vibe. This explains nearly everything about why males and masculine-minded women are those who both have the most destructive and creative minds. They can make the funniest comedies, the saddest tragedies, they can be an Einstein, Tesla, Mozart and/or Mandela, or a Hitler, Caesar, Stalin and/or Genghis Khan.

You can look at me and say 'but the world was rigged, you are talking about what men did while things were always rigged against the women who wanted to do it.' and you'd be right in one way; they had an easier time making their ambition have a payoff for it in an external manner but that's also because societies in all races, even matriarchal tribes, followed a core, fundamental concept:

Men (especially very masculine ones) want you to feel what they feel and will stop at nothing until you are in as much awe to their own idea as they are, as angry about what they loathe as they are or as happy about what they enjoy and love as they are... This then creates the dilemma of if every man loved the same woman equally, then what? Exactly. Men waged war more than women and invented more than women not just out of unfair headstart; it is their urge to make everyone feel what they feel that backfires when other men actually begin to feel what they feel... It snowballs back and they get the same lust for the same title, reward etc. as the other guy and want everyone to feel it.

Women (especially very feminine ones) run entirely on what they want to feel and do not want to feel. They do not give the slightest damn if you feel it too or think it too, so long as your behaviour is grounding to them emotionally and leaves them calmer or happier than when they came to be in your presence in the first place. It's that simple.

Not your ex then. 'Grats.

RIP BR, not that I knew you too well.

I think it is severely anti-Sun-Tzu-esque if I were to reveal my own equation that openly but I do have one.

I will say this, the place where you have 'fun' is where I have the 'power' and the thing I divide by is more like fun - what you call 'size' but it's not really a division equation or as simple as 'this vs that' because often the bad comes with partial benefits and vice versa.

You can think of my equation like this:

       Energy level in units of power capacity inside me * life priorities right now being met (in %)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  =   ?Pwrefficiency

Net gain from putting in effort required for this project in units of power/influence/agency

==========

CLASSIFIED } OUTPUT IN UNITS OF 'FUN AND/OR NET SATISFACTION'

==========

Size of project and thus cost in Energy * Stage 1's result

---------------------------------------------------------------------------   = True Power Optimisation Score

                         Stage 2's result

Once you work out Stage 2 and truly decipher the rest of it too, you will be on your way to successfully manipulating and/or controlling me but note that when/if I notice what you are doing, the stage 2 evolves because it includes more than just fun.

What is 'size' as opposed to responsibility?

It was a Tyrone reference.

The user who apparently campaigned to get me into the hall of fame did not vote me in either the nomination or voting stages. He voted only for supadudz in the second Round, making the theory very hilarious to believe in.

Hammer and Shoral have a love-hate relationship with me. They hate to love me but can't resist.

Vaarka votes Supa Virt Mike. This was planned well ahead, I know it now.

You think you are making me look dumb, but you are only accentuating my brilliance.

In fact, take note that Thett3 and REF both voted Mike and didn't get banned. Wylted did not. Banned. Spacetime did not. Banned. Hammer clearly betrayed and only voted Supa... 30 days banned.

Sometimes patterns are more telling than anything else.

I voted Mike by overturning from Ramshutu, Thett perhaps rewards me with a vote. Virtuoso tries to overturn it to Supa, they punish him by making it so Supa is the threat to his victory and Mike is safe. Virtuoso is blackmailed to expose the Discord Coordination of votes in order to defend his title. Supadudz was a pawn to them. I was a shockingly powerful contender but one Max learned to work around instead of directly against. I know it now and, in hindsight, played it very well. Fuck yes.

Airmax or YYW were my prime suspects for who Mike really is, perhaps it was a triple layered conspiracy where they planned to get Debateart.com to win. Time will tell.

Do not underestimate Airmax, he is one of the most intelligent and cunning strategists of DDO history.

Until this happened, Coal's claim of a DDO Elite being involved was a joke. Now we must open the horizon of what really was behind the election. YYW was always the alpha of the DDO Elite.

You could be right there (with the latter part) but are definitely right on the former. On this website I am also an anti-villain overall.