RationalMadman

I used TOR Browser to access it. These fuckers are quoting Sun Tzu in their homepage, they are no doubt about it experienced at what they are doing.

They are actively disallowing HTTPS on their main domain, I never said plugin, they do disable any form of HTTPS other than their Amazon thing on the "www." version of the domain only. That's sly, scam artist shit just like it's always been.

They are dirty and I always fucking knew it. It's a shell company, probably for either a group of nefarious people having a tax write-off or a government agency spying no people of strange views.

Tell me, why does Juggle have no HTTPS version? did you know it will cut your connection to it if you try to go to the HTTPS version?

That is some shady shit.

There is a user who calls themselves a fan of mine in their 'about me'. This user ignored me completely in both messages and being added as a friend (as well as pick and choosing what to reply to and what to ignore with my forum posts very selectively).

This user is not my fan. 

I was also curious what you can have in your 'about me' and how indirect or direct you can flame others via it.

Oh, so are you sorry for trolling the admin?

DDO isn't going to fuck up your computer, Dudz, it's going to spy on you and use your data for nefarious purposes, especially if your username, email and password have any connection elsewhere on the Internet as on DDO. It's owned by completely corrupt adscam click-count-faking artists who get ad revenue and tax write-offs and who knows what else, considering that they were complicit with pirted advertising.

You are just here to taunt and bully me.

I see Post 2. It disproved nothing I said whatsoever.

In this thread, would you care to show me the false information I have spread?

Show me the false information I have spread.

This app is more reliable than Chrome and Mozilla put together, it is a socialist concept of making HTTPS available to websites that don't even want to pay for the certificate. 

Chrome and Mozilla both support the means it uses to deal with websites where the certificate is invalid. Look at the sponsors of the 'Let's Encrypt' certificate: https://letsencrypt.org

The extension I use is this: https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere

Stop talking to me like I'm your fucking underling who is a piece of dirt to smirk at and humiliate even when I am trying to warn people not to go on a dangerous competitor of this website that may get their login details if they use the same password as here etc.

I am not interested in your putrid tone and attitude, go and talk to your reflection like that. I am here warning people. Tell me, who owns DDO?

The registrant of DDO ownership is clickablenames.com. This is not a case of them 'selling it to Juggle' like we were told, they have owned it the entire time and are only interested in generating revenue from superficial activity rates and the garnering of user data. What they then do with that data, no one knows. They clearly are not just interested in 'clickable names' they never actually sold the true domain of the website since 2015. From 28th July 2015, Juggle clearly sold the site back to Clickable Names (which makes sense, it was when Juggle suddenly began updating nothing on the website at all and it was hard to get Airmax to explain why). From that point forth it has been run by either neglectful or abusive owners that have enabled adspam bots that were advertising pirated content download links on a high-ranking website, and in turn enjoyed the activity-rate superficially going up. Shortly after the attacks, they qualified for a big sale to an advertising company and if you visit the website without adblock of any kind, it's jampacked with endless ads not just at the bottom but throughout (trip-links are coming soon probably etc, making it hard not to click an ad while you're there).

They got their own HTTPS registered, unique to themselves. This means they themselves certify that they are running a legitimate website with no leaks of data or shady shit going on in the behind-the-scenes coding and security of the database. They even ban my HTTPS Everywhere app from using public domain means of certifying a website in the most basic way via SSL encryption, it has "Let's Encrypt" free certificate available for any website that applies to it and/or enables it.

You do not know these things, so whatever. Just keep preaching. DDO literally only allows the encryption of data and tunneling of website navigation to happen via its self-certified HTTPS, it actively is banning other, willing/free means of encrypting it.

The certificate that DDO is using is not a trusted one that any other website than itself uses to validate its legtitmate encryption and ownership.

It is a phishing method it has used to get Amazon to certify it. It has certified its own HTTPS via some means it has purchased on Amazon. The domain of the HTTPS certificate is apparently owned by and unique to debate.org itself. That is why both Firefox and Chrome are noticing it. I also noticed it is doing a redirect before you hit the main website that is running javascript but it is so instantaneous, you can't notice it. If you visit pages on DDO (not the main site itself) from google searches or via some links on it, it will actually try redirecting you elsewhere than DDO but then back onto the real page.

There is something very shady going on and the anonymous owners of DDO are clearly in on it.

If you genuinely trust this website, you have no idea what has happened, they have new anonymous owners. Juggle is dead as a corporation. It is a phishing site, they are garnering data on you, DO NOT THINK FOR A SINGLE SECOND your PMs are not being read by the people behind it!

It is absolutely exposed, it has certified its own HTTPS via an account it bought on Amazon. Chrome and Firefox both noticed this.

I take it this is out of famous ones, yeah? 

It's only the top 3 of each, other racial complexions show up in my top 10 and such but I do have a thing sexually for white people and races that are closest to them, sorry if that offends you.

Females:

What occured happened before I even posted a thing to you.

I am not the moderator here, I can't enforce anything. You were a troll abusing the platform development request feature, in order to make the admin frustrated and insecure.

I had his back in a way bsh1 never would, that's all I am proving here. Bye. I don't give a single damn what you have to say back to this.

It is moments like this where I see that I am very clearly not the stereotypical autistic nerd that people think me to be.

I don't even comprehend how someone can be so socially-numbed that they bully while feeing like the victim in a situation that from the very start was them asking a question they knew the answer to, just to test the 'human subject' they were testing.

You asked a question that you already knew the answer to. You proved this by the very same reply with which you tried to make him feel shit for 'misunderstanding' your question (which he perfectly understood and answered).

When people ask 'can this not be done?' they mean 'can this be done?' and want the 'yes' and 'no' to refer to the original thing. You flipped this around purely to troll and pretended like the Admin made a mistake. If you genuinely struggled to grasp why he answered 'nope', you need severe social skill training and maybe shouldn't live under a rock.

This isn't a debate. This is you preying upon someone who is not a native English speaker, trying to troll them when they correctly read your question which flipped the dynamic to a 'not' for no reason at all just to troll with the next reply.

You are the bad guy here, trolling the admin of this website with the 'not' question like you did.

Read this up please:

I was not actually talking in metaphors.

Sorry to be graphic and blatant but anyone can take away what you want, even in anarchy... In graphic and sadistic ways, both severe and mild.

Nothing changes with government, the 'could take it all away' is always there.

Who is stronger: the richest one alive or the one that the richest one(s) can't touch with their money?

I aim for the 'immovable object' aura and position in the website hierarchy, you guys can go get your Dartbux and dilly dally, I'll always stay an OG round these parts that enough rich and powerful people will protect when you come for me.

'Unstoppable forces' are simply waiting to meet with what can stop them. Immovable objects aren't waiting to be moved. This fundamental difference makes aiming for the first as an end-goal of domination, self-destructive.

The truly terrifying opponent is the one who knows they are not an unstoppable force at all, but keeps on fighting anyway and adapts to what can stop them. The truly satisfying opponent to defeat is the one who thought they were an unstoppable force and finally they meet you; the immovable object.

Nothing highlights this better than Mcgregor vs Mayweather's fight. Pregame to Endgame, Mcgregor was the force waiting to be stopped, Mayweather was the object, smirking in its immovable position.

Your double negative was understood in the wording you used right now. His answer was 'no' to the question you asked now, he ignored the 'not'.

No, it does not. This lie is most easily disproven by Nixon and Reagan. Obama took so much flack for using NSA techniques that Bush Jr. Okay'd and that were planned to go on since Nixon's era, but only had the legal loopholes in place to enable it via the Patriot Act that happened post-9/11.

Authority and nanny-state censorship of media etc. were Republican concepts entirely. It was the Dems who wanted to give those against it more freedom, they've always been the friendlier party to anti-gov't groups and thats the only real reason why the KKK originally sided with the Dems, who were the more open party to a split-nation solution (Confederate States breaking off woth slavery legal while the North styed as US and abolished slavery). 

It also, then, was the Dems who had to completely steer the Civil Rights Movement to get anything done whatsoever, since Lincoln had left a lack of slavery but plenty of subtle means of subtle apartheid.

I don't enjoy emo raps, if you are depressed and suicidal I actually think it's a toxic piece of advice to take pride in what you write about it.

Write it all out, keep it to yourself. Read it later, help yourself get happy or cope. Then delete it. I aint into the whiny shit; the angry shit, however, I dig.

For what it's worth, I totally agree with you on the notion of God being unidentifiable in any objective sense, despite objectively being real.

God is real, do not be confused. There absolutely is necessitated to be an original entity that created the rest due to the fact that reality isn't totally random (you're not changing into a watermelon and then into air and then into a chihuahua at any given point in time, right?). That structure means that eventually the randomness, randomly generated a series of variables that turned 'on' or 'true' the attribute 'can alter/rig the randomness' to a randomly generated entity at the time. From that moment, everything changed forever. God was born and turned 'random chaos' into 'organised fate'. Still God answers to fate, for it was ultimately the 'disorganised fate' for God to exist and take over.

God to me is Fiora, she is a fascinating sadistic being that is entertained in testing us. She can even randomise certain variables (or maybe the randomness persists in spite of her organisation, not sure which) and this causes her to be able to be surprised and 'judge' or 'view with interest' the reality before her and entities such as us.

I have had enough of these Obamas, Bill Clintons and all that shit. It's not that they're establishment, that never was the issue. It's always gonna be an establishment goon who ends up running shit; it's about the one who gives a damn about the poor and vulnerable. You need that type up top or else the corruption will work so brutal to those on the bottom end of it. When corrupt works against other corrupt people, that is called balanced fair game. 

Warren knows what she's doing, she'll do it well. Sanders is preaching to some Socialist choir about how we need to stop big banks and all that nonsense. You won't ever stop big banks, you only can hope to challenge them in a friendly but firm manner. That's what Warren will do, she knows how the game works but has the heart.

I am fucking telling you if Warren wins, the best part of Illuminati will show through in America and the world, it will be a huge huge huge huge snowball effect you cannot imagine the good that will come.

If anyone else, even Yang, wins you will see 'too far left' happen and all hell will break loose next election cycle. We need a proper leader, but one who isn't only in it for the power. Warren absolutely is that.

True, but his question really was about search engines not being the means. DDG is definitely the superior option to Bing and Yahoo search but Google has reasons why giving up privacy can be useful. They organise links by relevance and reliability all at once so that will help him more than DDG for scholarly debates.

Wtf do I want all that effort for a JUDGE DEBATE (which is always unrated) where RAMSHUTU is voting?

NO THANK YOU!

At what?

I loathe government oppression, even when it benefits the people. I abhor taxing sugar to stop people having sugary drinks (especially when it's universal, affecting all having it even if they aren't obese or whatever). I abhor the government snooping in on private Internet conversations, controlling us via the media, censoring us beyond the severely graphic and/or threatening, and thinking it has a fucking damn right in hell to TELL US WHAT OUR RIGHTS ARE?!

Yet, I do not at all agree with Ron Paul types on anything other than an innate 'chaotic gene' I call it. You're definitely born with or without it, I am certain of it. You are born a rebel, never ever raised or forced to become one. You are born a motherfucking rascal or you're not. I am a freedom lover by nature. I understand that anarchy becomes tyranny-by-the-strongest in no time at all, instead I seek a version of Progressive agenda that ties Social Democracy in with Libertarian core values.

They are not contradictory at all. Nothing at all about Social Democracy requires us to censor each other or force affirmative action. If we focused so much more on equal opportunity instead of equal output we would be making things fair. To me, it's really simple; if a race, gender, creed, whatever else group, is better at something than others but despite this a race, gender, creed etc is being hired disproportionately in the face of what the statistics would imply based on potential in the pool of who is being hired, THEN you as a people, a nation of private investigators journalists who may ask for government assistance in the investigation but isn't dictated by them, should expose it and enforce affirmative action via boycotting.

The people are the motherfucking power, NOT THE PEOPLE 'IN POWER' GIVEN TO THEM BY THE PEOPLE. That is not a right-wing Libertarian concept, it is a concept of any rebel, leftist or not.

Stupidity isn't important to admit oneself has. Instead, appreciate that true stupidity lies in the inability to identify it in oneself, or to falsely notice it in others.

Your Conservative beliefs and way of seeing some nations as 'greater than' others in some kind of grand objective scaling highlight that much more than one skim reading going wrong.

Errors in thinking, laziness in logic-pathing in the brain and refusal to care about it are cancers of the human condition. People are so worried about being happy that they forget to be correct (and call people like me the ones who are 'lost', just ask John Lennon).

Read it slowly, take every word in, breathe in the realisation that you were wrong all along...

;D

If I cannot choose my side, I do not want in. This is VERY important to me and I will happily be called a pathetic coward who runs from tournaments if need be.

I am not good at debating all topics and I hate playing devil's advocate against a strong opponent because I become sick to my stomach typing shit I know is vile stuff that could convince someone to support Brexit, Trump or that NASA and the UN aren't part of a clandestine group.

It will be an absolute criteria that I get to agree to the topic and side before the debate ensues, otherwise I do not want to partake in it. I tried this vs blamonkey when sure, I was not as tailored to this site's audience in debating but I gave up after R1 of trying to prove that US should keep Saudi as an ally because honestly I dislike both nations and hope they see the bad side of each other.

I can't do that again, I accept you calling me a pansy. I am sensitive, it's true. I am emotionally powered when I believe in a debate that doesn't hold risk of harming me IRL (so I avoid exposing the true details of Illuminati or flat earth conspiracy beyond what another has compiled already, as if I were to do that then the Elite will truly be displeased with me, for now I keep me head low enough and provide just as little evidence as it required for me to be on the 'tame truther' list, oh yes there is such a list they have and I am certain I am on it).

I donated real hard cash to the website 2 months worth of Patreon and even did it while banned, wrongly, for 3 days and later a 2 week ban.

I was told that the site doesn't give a single shit about money and that I was nothing but a servant to bsh1 regardless. I then took it on board and served the website behind the scenes working hard every day at organising it and coming up with ideas, transferring ideas from the forums into a brainstorm layout within the software, as well as adding many of my own (and helping restructure new ideas from Ramshutu and Virtuoso and even the admin himself).

I was rewarded with bsh1 never joining it, having people pile on me when I asked bsh1 to have a MEEP for us and was told I couldn't moderate my way out of a paper bag and than I'm essentially a piece of shit on the bottom of the site's shoe.

I then quit the Trello, leaving everything I could have sabotaged the organisation of (and deleted all of) in place and helped still with suggestions, bugs and advising people on the admin's behalf of issues and suggestions they have and how it's being handles or can be handled better. I welcome(d) each new member with open arms and you will notice that I have a significant balance between noob allies, noob enemies, oldtimer allies and oldtimer enemies. That is because I am true to myself and don't fuck around here out of any petty motive other than to be a great debater and human being. 

I am not interested in what you have to say.

Don't fucking RIP the competition to replace DDO. Civid ran against DebateIsland and DART both.

I loathe the education system. I loathe every part of putting everyone in a box that the government controls and caters to their financial backers' interests.

I also loathe a random corporation shoving its religion down people's throats with an even more corrupt agenda as well as parents doing this at home via homeschooling. So, when you talk to me about education being broken, it's more of a 'survival of the fittest' kind of thing no matter how you try to cottonwool it for the masses.

Not everyone is smart enough to 'make it' in the world, we need road-pavers, wall painters, musicians, artists, shopkeepers and a whole array of people who have some form of genius that education can't cater to or measure. These people exist and are there in society, with no need at all for anything beyond rudimentary math, English (and/or their native tongue) and science (math including economics as in statistics) to handle their walk of life. These people are told to sit down, keep their mouths shut and study to regurgitate ideas and score a grade. 

Let me put it like this. There are two very different types of brilliant players in league of legends; mechanical geniuses and macro geniuses. You will find that the mechanical geniuses can 'learn' the macro decision making and make it very far in the Pro scene, whereas the 'macro geniuses' cannot learn how to make ingenious flashy plays or how to handle a team where people don't think in the ways they do about the overall map and concept etc. They find it extremely hard to translate their talents into the pro scene but make fantastic players, often you will find that out of the top 20 players every season outside of the pro scene in the game itself's season ranking, 14 are macro players and 6 are brutal mechanical players. The 6 brutal mechanical players in any region often are either pros or could easily make it as pros if they had the ambition to do so whereas the macro geniuses are rarely even streamers, since they're introverted geniuses who just want to be left alone but if they are streamers they are very much the quiet type.

Let's look at something like movies. You can learn your way into becoming a great soap-opera rom-com maker but you cannot learn, nor measure via examination, the kind of genius of Tarantino, Spielsberg, George Lucas etc. They are brilliant, they prove it in practise but if you examined them on 'this is what the textbook says on directing', it's likely Tarantino would score lowest with the other 2 struggling to agree with the general consensus on certain parts.

I don't see it as an issue that I need to be more disciplined than you do, Ramshutu. I see it as a compliment to my self-discipline that I can reign it in and hold my cool while you're sneering at me with the crowd jeering you on (yes sneering, jeering, I know). 

Rudyard Kipling's 'if' is always a go to but frankly it should be rewritten and be more about being a disciplined person worthy of admiration; whether a woman or a man. 

They were made by King_8 alts who are already banned. nice try.

I have gone into depth on it before, would you like case study examples, such as deleting my debates for the exact reason that he didn't delete others as well as after the MEEP that officially enacted it as a rule, I reported the debates with banned users but no deletion occured?

Would you like me to highlight how Ramshutu talks to me like a piece of fucking vermin, how people can call me vermin (rat) and if I were to speak in the same tone and style of taunting to them, I have extreme legal precedent to show I'd be banned for it?

If I spoke to you as harsh as you spoke to me, I'd be banned for flaming you.

That's all I gotta say.

If you want to silence me, you're gonna need to try harder than whining like spoilt brats to daddy bsh.