RationalMadman

Do you fake interest in people and ask questions about them to reply snide remarks afterwards? I notice that you run around to debates and call people who debate tryhards and then complain that they are not tryharding when they don't be tryhards. Do you do anything other than complain and insult?

Being laughed at and underestimated is one of my greatest talents, that is not at all a joke.

I am fantastic at many multiplayer online games thanks to knowing exactly how to intentionally (or even accidentally but in a minute way) making a mistake here and there that makes my enemies comfortable that I am not the perfect player. Then they bet big and make a super risky move later, totally underestimating me and bam, I win and profit hard never letting the snowball-lead I just gained slow down until I win. I enjoy being underestimated, both physically and intellectually, hell even emotionally. It is important to be seen as weak enough, dumb enough and emotionally vulnerable enough that all of your enemies feel comfortable that you're not a real threat to them. Failure to do this with even one enemy, opens you up to the enemy realising how great you are and giving you their A-game which will increase stress against you etc and tire you out making the guy who made himself or woman who made herself be underestimated a little, end up on top of you in the long run as they end up with no one really full-out taking them down for long while you have people trying their level best to do so, hellbent on revenge.

At the moment I have one main reason not to, I would clash brutally with Ramshutu and struggle to have a good working relationship with bsh1. Nonetheless, I could be a great mod if I really treated this site like a job and I have already come up with the perfect way I'd handle Ramshutu and bsh1 (neither would be banned, especially not bsh1 which has no justifiable reason to ban) in order to tame them and make them happy to work under me if I were chief moderator.

As for why I am not moderator yet, it comes down solely to Mike and his worry that people wouldn't like me. That itself stems from knowing I am both intelligent and unpredictable, which makes me dangerous for his agenda because he knows I would not be easy to remove once I am in power. If he were to demote bsh1, bsh1 would likely not throw a major tantrum, same with Virtuoso. Ramshutu would but Ramshutu is consistent in that he will value gaining power back over expressing discontent over the power lost so Mike knows that Ramshutu would tame himself if Mike simply offered him a much lesser role and gave him a pat on the back. On the other hand, there is me. I will come and tell you that I am a sexually dominant genius motherfucker and then spit verses out of nowhere too. While I have my boundaries and never directly violate CoC, I also treat this site as what it really is; a recreational place to let off steam, not a professional environment to be a member of staff. If I were to be moderator, Mike would need to provide me an account that is used pretty much solely for that stuff. If he did that, I'd put on my professional self's mask and be a quiet, disciplined moderator but he already knows that even then, the rebellious 'don't you dare demote me' guy would be present and I'd intentionally be partly corrupt in order to keep my position and please the masses.

Being a moderator and being corrupt go hand in hand, the difference is that moderators who know what they are doing will pick the right friends to be corrupt with and get rid of real assholes and scumbag users in the correct fashion, even going as far as legal action if need be if the users begin threatening or continually abusing the website's means of signing up etc to bypass bans. It's not easy to be a moderator, I never ever suggested that. You will get haters, lovers who then will partially break rules later that you'll struggle to punish and so much more. I don't lust the job but I know I'd be great at it, regardless. I would be someone everyone feared and/or respected in their own way. It would begin small but over time I'd snowball it, have a real team working under me, delegate moderation (especially if the person being punished is my friend, I don't want to deal with that manipulation but I also know that lowkey I'd want to avoid banning them for my own sake) and that's basically it. This is also why Mike won't pick me for moderator; I'm too damn willing to admit that I'm going to be biased somewhat and openly will tell the website 'I went easy on X for Y reason and went ham on Z for B reason.' and will even openly discuss the why's and how's to keep drama alive and activity going as well as being seen as a fantastic moderator by all (even my haters).

The reason why bsh1 stays in power is he's timid. He knows how to make everything appear like someone else's fault (his MEEPs are always angled, always bullshit wording and whether you vote yes or no his enforcement will not at all alter, especially with the recent 'delete debates against banned users' which solely was for me and enacted retroactively which he now will say it wasn't but was always against the rules). He does everything sly, lowkey and knows how to constantly shine the limelight on someone else like myself, disgusted and even you if ever drama breaks out too severely. This is why not enough people ever build a 'remove bsh1 from power' thing for long enough. He knows how to say to Mike 'I did nothing wrong man' and make it indeed appear that way to his lovers.

If you mean the 1-10 system, (denary counting) then that's solely a social construct because for some reason the humans found '5' easy to remember and chunk things by and they figured 5 was too small but 5*2 was a good amount to make the minimum amount before you go to the '10'.

If you mean mathematics in and of itself, you are correct but no more so than someone who says without language the very same thing would be true. In fact, language is more essential than mathematics if one wants to comprehend ideas or use the information that is garnered mathematically, in a creative and/or extensive way.

I agree that Vaarka is barely a user of this website but he/she/they's the owner and by extension admin of the site's official Discord server.

So, one may ask why that is so, and the answer one may get will be 'don't you dare ask'. Vaarka, Supadudz and Warren42 are the site's Discord server's Illuminati. They did less to earn ownership of the Discord server than Bsh1 did to earn modship here and that's saying something.

Big man, strong man,

Enemies are the wrong clan,

You step up to the madman and that's that; you're a long gone man.

Learn how to use 'your' and 'you're' before trying to be a smart alec who laughs at everyone.

See what I did there? I hit 2 members at once.

Is that you over there?

the King of K-ing has spoken.

Other posts include we are homophobia and bullying! Oh no someone is doing such horrific things pretending to be one of ours!

Look at the DDO forums, how could someone do that to our innocent member?

The K is the forbidden technique of the noobsniper. Ramshutu has brought justice to all the K'ers except himself and Ragnar. Oh the K, the Ninja way!

What irony?

Your 'your' is unwelcome.

Thanks

Because he's a genius of strategy.

Here is what you are meant to do. 

1658 / 100,000 = .01658

Then you multiply that by 100 to get the 1.66 (which was less as he has less posts to begin with and was 1.65) so Alec was correct for the wrong reasons.

The funny part is Alec is correct about the percentage, supadudz is wrong. The part that is strange is why Alec's second step is incorrect on both parts.

- Alec, our resident genius.

We both know what this conversation really was. You're not used to someone giving you as good as they get. I assure you, I'm aware of how numbskulled I can appear at times, it's destressing for me to do it but when it comes down to it, I'm a hundred steps ahead of you, whether you believe it or not. 

Ramshutu, you're beginning to engage in the very passive-aggressive mod-action threats that you accused me of.

If you truly want to and can take me down, do it. Bear in mind, Sun Tzu wouldn't let his enemy defeat him without mutually assured destruction at play. Not that I'm Sun Tzu.

Either back the full fuck off of me and never ever try even subtly threatening me like that again or flat out do it and see who is or is not punished at the end. That's not a threat man, that's a full on statement of where we stand.

Good boy.

Oh I see, well I had similar complaints when supadudz revealed my YouTube channel that now I can't post vids in because it's linked to this via his exposing me but the moods said that wasn't doxxing. I didn't think making up something about CD conspiracy theories that resulted from you saying I asked Type1 to make debates so that I'd get free wins, would be taken as serious threats. You have nothing to hide right? I'm really sorry you felt threatened by me.

Please delete those posts if possible, I had no idea it was actually true.

I was just kidding around, I swear I didn't really think you had CD accounts that are in any way affiliated with Type1, I am so so sorry it's true it was a total accident. I won't ever say it again.

No idea where to find the threats. They're just fantasies I made up that are fairytales, right?

Perhaps take it up with the mods and refer them to the location and context of the threats and what you post on said accounts, I'm sure they'll deal with things very appropriately.

That's funny the conversation you're referring to never happened, would you like to refer me to where when and how it came up? These threats?

I g2g for now and frankly I'm losing interest in this as I know you will just keep bringing up the same thing again and again to trigger me so I'll leave it at this:

Flip your concept via inversion.

It's the biggest herd that definitely has the biggest boogeyman.

You are saying the effect/result is the cause, think about it and realise that the psychological 'we need an enemy to unite' concept doesn't actually mean that the bigger enemy is needed for the bigger herd at all, it means the biggest herd by definition has the biggest enemy. If that enemy is made to be the very concept of not uniting, advancing and progressing, we have achieved the goal I set for society to achieve. It's the last I'll say on this, feel free to smear campaign me further.

How about the boogeyman of war, lack of advancement, failure to progress etc? Do you really think social democracies only unite against a common enemy? That's truly absurd, since they are very anti-war overall (no, Europe was not a social democracy during WW2, don't even go there). If you bring up Iraq etc, yeah Britain was involved I get it. Who exactly made the whole thing happen? If you say Blair and not Bush, idk what to tell you other than really it was oil companies most of all.

If anyone was curious of my personal stance (since this is MY thread that you are all derailing which began with pinkfreud passive-aggressively flaming me severely via analogy) I loathe what leafy does and have no clue how I am seen as the Leafy here.

Ramshutu copies my images' concepts to troll me and flips them back on me. He dedicates his forum and voting strategy mostly towards trolling those who try the hardest at it (not just me, I just happen to be the tryhard) and revolves around mass-appeal to silence his victims or make them so humiliated if they don't stay silent.

This is textbook Leafyishere MO, not at all idubbz. I am, if anything the idubbz. idubbz's strategy is to say 'yeah I'm a dickhead but you know what? Person X is a bigger one and if you don't think so, so be it!'

So, pinkfreud is just leaping up and down hoping to make me feel shitty but I'm not the shallow one who uses the website to bring the other down at all, I'm the one who isn't afraid to be an asshole to an asshole is all.

That is hilarious. Humans have been the single most expansive species other than viruses/bacteria (we're even more geographically expansive than insects, though they're almost equal) and yet we're thwarting all of them in such extreme degrees across the board in all ways other than physical dominance via our body.

On top of that simple concept, note that the more developed we've become over time, the more globalist we've evolved politically. It is completely and utterly directly proportional, we have functioned, are functioning (despite Trump's bullshit) and will function as the world's war makers and peacekeeper for pretty much the entirety of the Earth's remaining time unless and alien species invades. Even if we evolve into somehow another creature or two, they will work with humans purely out of 'pragmatism' as you put it, there's too many of us and we're far too useful to waste, even for overlord AI.

I will stick to what I said in that debate with you. The US is great because countries choose to submit to it. If it wasn't for the countries like Canada that ally with and submit to US, it would begin to have a lot of trouble maintaining its greatness because pressure would begin to build within the nation to stay peaceful and gamble less and less with the world. It's because it stemmed from Europeans pillaging and abusing the natives that the entire western Europe and Canada decided to fully ally it. South America and 'mid America' (Mexico etc) remained neutral, thanks to the Spanish and Portuguese who conquered it having a very neutral stance with the Italians, British, Irish, French and whoever else that invaded the US and Canada. This original alliance and willing submission to the domineering US is why it was able to over time snowball via calculated aggression while the rest of the world didn't ever have quite enough allies to truly unite against it but due to this, it's made enough enemies that if it ever truly tried to conquer a nation that has more than 2 specific allies, it's extremely likely the US would be ganged upon, especially here in 2019 post-Iraq-and-Afghanistan. Syria isn't a victory, it's only working because UK helped convince Europe to side with the US on it. Most of the EU nations want pure neutrality with Syria (I am not saying this is completely correct, especially with how horrific Assad has been, but I am stating the facts of why US is able to do it despite what I just said before).

So, yes, the US is probably the single greatest nation on Earth at this point because it's allowed to be by nations that enable it via wilful submission.

What is pragmatic, functional or maximising utility about a world where because someone was born in one place, they have no capacity to interact with you, born in another? 

No. The biology of the brain has indeed evolved morality and tendencies, due to the natural selection of sociopaths and psychopaths being low in the genepool for the aforementioned reasons. Regardless, 'natural is good' is total and utter nonsense, rather the need for 'good' is what naturally evolved and only that is true if we deal in objective facts with scenarios like this.

Whether we live in a hyper-isolationist world or an entirely one-world-nation world, there can absolutely be equal bad and good in those worlds because it's all completely subjective where you draw lines or what you say is best vs worst for all in net-benefit vs net-loss.

That is the first type that I instantly block indeed.

Humans also have an instinct to explore, expand, negotiate, socialise and make peace. Checkmate, stop the 'it's natural so it's right' arguments please, it's tiring to hear from both sides of the spectrum. Natural has nothing to do with 'right'. It's natural for rabbits to eat their own young, it's also natural for coyotes to eat eggs of other creatures. I guess then that abortion is okay to you? 

Nature has zero percent to do with morality, other than that we evolved to have morals since psychopaths tend to abuse their children and neglect their overall wellbeing, meaning even though they charm and fuck better than most that they usually don't pass their genes very far. Sociopaths, on the other hand, compete well if/when they have children to make their children strong but in general are shit at the charming and committing long-term part of relationships and raising children.

The Sociopath is the less disciplined one, the Psychopath is the careful, methodical one who is dead inside more so than the sociopath is. If you were curious of the difference and why most say 'sociopaths are less dangerous' it's because while the sociopath will more likely hurt you harder in one event, the psychopath will better get away with it if/when they do and will hurt you in legal ways far more efficiently than the sociopath ever will. Hybrids exist, it's a spectrum not a 'this or that', so yeah some people will fit both. 

Ramshutu is the Leafy in our rivalry, that much is for sure.

When someone will do something for you that they wouldn't do for others you begin to like and/or love them or dislike and/or hate them depending how positively that impacts you and how intentional that feeling you have was on their part.

My favourite resolutions are 'X is Y in the context of Z' this is the single best format where Y is an adjective that is somewhat scaled either qualitatively or quantitatively and Z refers to a specific context in which the scaling applies.

It's not the resolution that makes a great debate but it can be the resolution that makes a bad debate much worse.

It's the person you debate against along with you and the chemistry between you that decides how great a debate will go.

Thanks again

Sea is sacred. If you're gonna do this, truly respect the life.

Thanks

it is not up to me to explain to you what tabula rasa is supposed to be, it is up to you to live up to your words or continue on the path you are going down.

the only fucking thing that's so unique here is that you're such a huge percent of the voting base on every single debate. That is what is so utterly ridiculous about this website.

In time you will learn why I am the Sun Tzu prodigy and you are the Subutai wannabe.

I am not here to fight you, I have already won. You are so focused on this one tiny event you don't see it; your street cred is permanently marred here. When our grandchildren check out the DA OG's they'll see the true envy you seeped and the way I carried myself through it all, blood sweat and tears I don't give a shit what you call it.

You are dull without me, you're the moon to my sun. your image remained a dollar coin for the entire 14 days I was away with a 50 cent image LOL! 50 Cent would be PROUD of how rattled I got you and how I used the beef to recuperate and analyse the situation. All I saw was a dying website, all I saw was this site matters waaaay less as a serious competitive thing than I thought and far more as a chit chat battle arena on the forums than I thought, as well.

I think it's possible she'll win, she's my true hope to win. If I am wrong about it being Biden and instead it's her, I will be so happy to be wrong.

Okay, I am too triggered to continue this. I am letting you know so you don't wait for me to reply. You need to search 'cultural evolution' and study it please.

Cultures evolve. Species also evolve. These are not mutually exclusive statements.