Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Actually only Sam debates like that out of him and I. I have a lot of sophistication to both my debating AND my insults but I rarely mix the two.
When I mix the two, I don't need the conduct vote anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Zeichen
@SamStevens
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@mustardness
But at the point they are allowing abortion in this bill, it's no longer a parasite that can't cope outside the mother's womb. Try again.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
@coal
Here is a very good left-hating video (but still good despite the bias) explaining just how severely abhorrent the Bill is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
And you're the guy with the disgusting-sounding laugh then? Are you ugly too or is that just an error in the depiction?
Created:
Posted in:
Supa, you have threatened me with mod action, bullied me and told me to not feel welcome posting on the site, multiple times. Eventually you are going to realise just who the hell you are intimidating and realise it is you should fear me.
Created:
Posted in:
I will give you a song that sums you up. Both the mood, lyricism and technical aspects of the song will reflect you.
Here is mine:
Created:
Posted in:
There is a concept people have; more the merrier.
This is total, utter bullshit. The best sex ever had was 2 or 3 people together. The best debates and deep discussions that changed your life happened one-on-one or in a group of no bigger than, say, 3 yes?
Intimacy is paramount.
Created:
Posted in:
At least question 1 and 2 will become properly dealt with.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Accurate prediction. Brown bears would have eaten him alive. Polar bears would probably just let him rot.
Black bears are much kinder and more sensitive. If black bears begin to scare people, it alarms the black bear itself and it tries to comfort them (which can scare them more).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I am blocked by too many idiots to join.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
If this next best thing is employed, it will be the sole thing deterring the best thing being employed.
This comes at a cost and it isn't a light one. "Anything other than doxxing or threats" incorporates a whole lot else that is vile to show others and display as site-permitted content despite being site-deterred content.
Created:
Posted in:
Generally, people here are not both morally and intellectually deficient enough to appoint censorship.
So, what's your view on child pornography?
Created:
Posted in:
Why should it be left up there? Why should your insulting of another user be on public display if it's severe enough to get warned and punished for depending on previous actions?
Created:
Posted in:
The moral good and intellectually adequate will vote for a favorable outcome.
Tautology, means nothing for either side of question 3.
It's common knowledge that people will advocate for anything that sustains their liberty in speaking over a rule that severely caps said liberty.
Not everyone wants liberty. It is not a more liberal system that punishes but leaves things up for people to see, it is simply idiotic as it is just as strict but worse at cleaning up the mess.
Created:
Posted in:
"Your content is so vile that you'll be punished for it but we'll leave it up there for others to see and to represent our website to non-users."
LOL, sure, vote no to #3, ignore the logic and hypocrisy.
Created:
Posted in:
I suppose people don't have to think things through when voting yes or no. May as well flip a coin and if most say 'no' it's magically the idiot who said 'yes' to #3.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
No it shouldn't, instead the CoC should be changed to be more liberal if you believe the content isn't too offensive or disgusting to be left on-site.
Created:
Posted in:
1. Should DART moderation be able to punish users for sever misconduct which occurs on the site's discord?
YES BUT NOT RETROACTIVELY as the bad conduct on Discord was made with respect given to the values of the site being considered to not apply to Discord.
2. Should there be a public ban log?
NO. There should be a private one that is selectively made available.
3. Should COC-violating conduct be deleted?
YES BUT 'deleted' should not mean it gets destroyed from your (mod) end of things.
UNLESS IT IS SPAM, in which case deletion is acceptable in the pure sense of the term.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I meant supa did to you
Created:
Posted in:
and more blocking of the members worth a single fucking thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I didn't ask you what you thought.
Created:
@SupaDudz
when it suits you, you cry and threaten with mod action publicly like no other user is allowed to to:
3 days ago or whatever : https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/1262/post_links/53625
to poly you threatened and intimidated her many times in a vulgar manner saying 'don't you dare talk to me bitch you'll get banned' and other stuff.
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I don't deserve to be, thanks for your input.
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
When it's RM that's picked on or you, it's all gucci.
When Supa gets picked back on, like a bitch someone will cry (can't say who).
Created:
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
Thank you for crying.
Created:
1. Johnny Depp
2. Tom Hanks
3. Matt Damon
4. Samuel L. Jackson
5. Natalie Portman
6. Kristen Bell
7. Kevin Spacey (this is based on skill and career-building up until the end, not morality)
8. Leonardo DiCaprio
9. Meryl Streep
10. Nicole Kidman
Created:
WARNING ALL POSTS ARE OFFENSIVE AND SOME ARE WORSE THAN OTHERS
Would you like more samples of how great your moderation style is?
Stop aiming for laissez-faire. Ban the bullies and vote-gangers immediately.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Challenge me to a formal debate and I will show you just how much depth there is to the skill and culture you are blind to as is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
I would crush you. Challenge me to this as a debate where you are pro-removal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
No dude, it really is not. It's like talking about a culture you don't participate in just because they're a clique in your workplace and telling them what they should get rid of.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
This is a forum-only guy talking about formal debating ^^^
Clearly he knows all about our culture and the intricacies of comment section politics.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
As a non-liberal progressive who truly understands what left-wing policy is for and the aims of it, I will agree with your wing on this law being immoral.
This is not protecting the vulnerable more than it is hurting the vulnerable and thus is more conservative than progressive.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Your suggestion is toxic and doesn't appreciate the social side, nor the concept of discussion and debate-specific expansion that debates involve.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Death23
Losers tend to get amused when those who put in the work are considered as poor-at-what-they-do as the losers. That is not surprising to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Totally bad and malicious suggestion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
There are no people who would wipe the floor with me, whether less than ten or not.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
Your doubt is irrelevant to my truth.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
That was Allah.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
I know Jesus, the second-form of Lucifer.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
Do you realise, or not, how utterly pure-bred vain Jesus was? He was literally vanity-embodied in a persona with only Allah or Zeus being more Vain in the history of deified figures.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
I am confused, do you think those that submit to something know it better by default?
Created:
Created:
-->
@Mopac
No one is saying he is a doppleganger, there are differences to all Gods, but the SIMILARITIES are uncanny. Let me put it like this:
There's nothing about him that wasn't mimicked other than dying on a cross.
Created: